Letter to the Editor: What did he expect?
By Bob Bogardus, Bartlesville on Sep 16, 2013, at 2:21 AM Updated on 9/16/13 at 6:50 AM
Letters to the Editor
In his letter, ("No One Listened," Aug. 31) Robert Leppelmeir made some inaccurate claims, inaccurate conclusions and key omissions. His intent was to exonerate George W. Bush for his war against Iraq.
Re: Baby Veronica story: Isn't it just a little odd that the same attorneys in Oklahoma City and South Carolina and the adoption agency are the same parties in the Desaray case in Oklahoma City and are now representing the Capobiancos.
I'm not sure what Dusten Brown thought he was signing when he signed the papers giving up parental rights to Baby Veronica, but if he knew what they were (and if he is a conscientious, caring and loving father as he claims to be, he should have read and understood those papers or had them explained to him by a family lawyer before signing them).
What did he expect his rights would have been if an adoption were not on the table?
He should have expected Veronica's birth mother to deny him and/or his family (including the Cherokee Nation) any access to Veronica at all.
Letters to the editor are encouraged. Send letters to
letters@tulsaworld.com.
Letters to the Editor
In his letter, ("No One Listened," Aug. 31) Robert Leppelmeir made some inaccurate claims, inaccurate conclusions and key omissions. His intent was to exonerate George W. Bush for his war against Iraq.
Re: Baby Veronica story: Isn't it just a little odd that the same attorneys in Oklahoma City and South Carolina and the adoption agency are the same parties in the Desaray case in Oklahoma City and are now representing the Capobiancos.
