NEWS FEED

Divorces ASKED

21 hours ago

Marriages (Tulsans unless indicated)

21 hours ago

Gunman in Navy Yard rampage was hearing voices He had been treated since August by Veterans Affairs, the officials said.

13 hours ago

191 Comments

Putin and Obama

2 days ago

166 Comments

Obama's Jail

5 days ago

116 Comments

United We Stand

6 days ago

88 Comments

Obama Foreign Policy

4 days ago

2024 Olympics: Could ridicule lead to success?

By ZACK STOYCOFF Staff Writer on Jul 2, 2013, at 6:25 PM  Updated on 7/02 at 7:02 PM



CITY HALL

Reader-suggested names for the capital package

We asked you to send in your suggestions for naming the city’s $918.7 million capital improvements package in honor of the ...

Help name the capital improvements package

Now that Tulsa City Councilors have finalized plans to send their $918.7 million capital improvements proposal to voters ...

Name sought for city funding package: Vision3?

Anything but Vision2.

That tends to be the only preference among city officials in naming the coming $919.9 million ...

CONTACT THE BLOGGER

Zack Stoycoff

918-581-8486
Email

2013/7/DOWNTOWN_TULSA_7567761.JPG

See? We have tall buildings. JAMES GIBBARD/Tulsa World


Unassuming.

Not exactly first-class.

The butt of jokes.

Those are some of the ways national reporters have described Tulsa in the months since the City Council heard an update on the city’s chances to host the 2024 Olympic summer games.

Tulsa? Really? Are these small-town heartlanders hallucinating?

“You won’t believe which American city is fighting for the 2024 Olympics,” reads the headline of a story that goes on to say that calling Tulsa a midsized city “may be generous.”

“Sydney. Athens. Beijing. London. Rio. Tulsa. Wait. What?” begins an ESPN blog that compares Tulsa to a town dreaming of hosting Olympic events in its local YMCA and jokes that Tulsa’s mayor “probably has a name like Dewey Bartlett. Oh. His name really is Dewey Bartlett.”

A February USA Today list of Olympic hopefuls says of Tulsa, simply, “Scoff if you want. We did.”

A Monday New York Times story is the latest and probably kindest bit of national attention, calling Tulsa unassuming but rightfully dubbing Oklahoma’s “reputation as a Dust Bowl flyover state choked with tumbleweed” outdated.

No argument that Oklahoma’s second-largest city pretty much has no chance in Jim Thorpe’s decathlon of hosting the Olympic Games, but we certainly aren’t Wagoner or Okmulgee - no offense to Wagoner and Okmulgee.

Tulsa (population 396,466 in 2011) is larger than Minneapolis, (392,880), St. Louis, (318,172) and Cleveland (390,928).

And it wouldn’t be the smallest American city to host the Olympics. That honor belongs to Park City, Utah, which hosted the winter games in 2002 and has a population in 2011 of barely 7,000.

I asked Bartlett, the butt of at least one joke in the national media, if he has any ill-will about the recent coverage.

“At the end of the day, getting on the front page of the New York Times is not such a bad exercise,” he said.

If nothing else, he added, it may make Tulsa a more serious candidate for other large events.

Can’t argue with that.

Maybe it’s like a yard sale negotiation – you ask for more knowing you’ll get less.

Now that the world has seen Tulsa’s name mixed in with other Olympic cities, can we be taken seriously for something just slightly less grandiose?

A higher round of the NCAA college basketball tournament, perhaps?

So kudos to the Tulsa Olympic Committee. Your dream may be slipping, but you’ve propelled us nonetheless.

We can handle a black eye in the process.


Follow Kevin Canfield on Twitter.

Follow Zack Stoycoff on Twitter.

YOUR IN-DEPTH LOCAL NEWS SOURCE: Visit tulsaworld.com throughout the day for local breaking news and investigative reports about Tulsa and northeastern Oklahoma.
CITY HALL

Reader-suggested names for the capital package

We asked you to send in your suggestions for naming the city’s $918.7 million capital improvements package in honor of the ...

Help name the capital improvements package

Now that Tulsa City Councilors have finalized plans to send their $918.7 million capital improvements proposal to voters ...

Name sought for city funding package: Vision3?

Anything but Vision2.

That tends to be the only preference among city officials in naming the coming $919.9 million ...

CONTACT THE BLOGGER

Zack Stoycoff

918-581-8486
Email

COMMENTS

Join the conversation.

Anyone can post a comment on Tulsa World stories. You can either sign in to your Tulsa World account or use Facebook.

Sign in to your online account. If you don't have an account, create one for free. To comment through Facebook, please sign in to your account before you comment.

Read our commenting policy.


Join the conversation.

Anyone can post a comment on Tulsa World stories.

Sign in to your online account. If you don't have an account, create one for free.

Read our commenting policy.

By clicking "Submit" you are agreeing to our terms and conditions, and grant Tulsa World the right and license to publish the content of your posted comment, in whole or in part, in Tulsa World.

NEWS FEED

Divorces ASKED

21 hours ago

Marriages (Tulsans unless indicated)

21 hours ago

Gunman in Navy Yard rampage was hearing voices He had been treated since August by Veterans Affairs, the officials said.

13 hours ago

191 Comments

Putin and Obama

2 days ago

166 Comments

Obama's Jail

5 days ago

116 Comments

United We Stand

6 days ago

88 Comments

Obama Foreign Policy

4 days ago