READ TODAY'S STORIES AND E-EDITION SUBSCRIBE |  CONTACT US |  SIGN IN

Print story only Print story with comments Email Twitter Facebook Pinterest
Lessons from Joplin: Take warnings seriously
Published: 9/22/2011 10:12 AM
Last Modified: 9/22/2011 10:12 AM




The National Atmospheric and Oceanic Administration released its assessment this week of the Joplin tornado, one of the largest and most deadly single tornadoes in U.S. history.

The report is a very interesting (which can be found here), and has several points that us here in Oklahoma can certainly relate to and warnings we should heed.

The first is just that: heed warnings. Warnings for the tornado were issued, but either through complacency or the “crying wolf” idea. From the report: “Responding to warnings is not a simple act of stimulus-response, rather it is a non-linear, multi-step, complex process. Relationships between false alarms, public complacency, and warning credibility are highly complex as well.”

From my own personal experience living in tornado alley, I can say that I have probably not taken tornado warnings as seriously as I should have. When a warning for my area is issued, I look at the sky and/or a radar image to see what’s coming. That’s silly: professionals whose sole job is to warn and protect us from impending doom just told me what is coming.

My actions seem to be similar to those many Joplin residents took. Again, from the report (which is based on hundreds of interviews with Joplin residents):

    “The vast majority of Joplin residents did not immediately take protective action upon receiving a first indication of risk (usually via the local siren system), regardless of the source of the warning. Most chose to further assess their risk by waiting for, actively seeking, and filtering additional information.
    "The reasons for doing so were quite varied, but largely depended on an individual‘s worldview formed mostly by previous experience with severe weather. Most importantly, the perceived frequency of siren activation in Joplin led the majority of survey participants to become desensitized or complacent to this method of warning. This suggests that initial siren activations in Joplin (and severe weather warnings in general) have lost a degree of credibility for most residents – one of the most valued characteristics for successful risk communication.”


The first sirens went off in Joplin at 5:11 p.m. The first touchdown on the outskirts of Joplin was at 5:34 and the tornado didn’t reach the city for another four minutes.

Some more interesting data from the report: Since 2007 nationally, 76 percent of all tornado warnings were false alarms. However, despite that high number, people in the path of tornadoes with an EF-3 rating had about 18 minutes warning time 94 percent of the time.

It seems that may have been part of the problem. People in Joplin had plenty of warning time, but when 76 percent of tornado warnings are false alarms, that can have an affect on a persons’ psyche when it comes to their personal response.

It’s important to mention what the text of warnings includes: The situation is occurring or is imminent. While a tornado warning may be in affect for your area, a tornado may not be on the ground, but those clouds sure are spinning.

For more weather-related lessons learned, the report states that the lower level storm rotation--and thereby the tornado itself--formed “very rapidly” as the storm approached. A more frequent radar scan of the storm’s lower elevations would have provided forecasters with more data about just how monumentally dangerous this storm was.

That was apparent, as is seen in the following radar image from the storm at 5:48, but by this time, the storm was over Joplin and the event was occurring.



Reading this report, it’s important to remember that hindsight is definitely 20/20, as they say. But, we can all take things away from this report. For example, don’t be complacent, pay attention to warnings and be safe.

It's also important to remember that the warning time most Joplin residents received was ample, and that surely saved many lives, the report states. The community's response in the aftermath also had a profound effect and prevented more deaths.

--Jerry Wofford



Reader Comments


To post comments on tulsaworld.com, you must be an active Tulsa World print or digital subscriber and signed into your account.
Almanac
View 2012
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun
Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
TemperaturePrecipitation
DateHigh TempLow TempTotalMonth to dateHistorical average
1 44° 16° 0 0.00 0.05
2 59° 24° 0 0.00 0.11
3 57° 33° 0 0.00 0.16
4 68° 37° Trace 0.00 0.21
5 69° 29° 0 0.00 0.26
6 66° 33° 0 0.00 0.32
7 59° 38° 0.05 0.05 0.38
8 51° 34° 0 0.05 0.44
9 44° 36° 0.01 0.06 0.51
10 62° 37° 0.07 0.13 0.57
11 54° 28° 0 0.13 0.64
12 44° 30° 0.25 0.38 0.70
13 55° 40° 0.01 0.39 0.76
14 ° ° 0.83
15 ° ° 0.89
16 ° ° 0.95
17 ° ° 1.02
18 ° ° 1.09
19 ° ° 1.16
20 ° ° 1.23
21 ° ° 1.31
22 ° ° 1.38
23 ° ° 1.46
24 ° ° 1.53
25 ° ° 1.61
26 ° ° 1.69
27 ° ° 1.77
28 ° ° 1.85

Weather World

Follow Jerry Wofford on Twitter for updates during severe weather conditions.

Tulsa weather milestones of 2013 (as of Feb. 12)

Highest temperature: 70 on Jan. 11 (Record: 115 on Aug. 15, 1936)
Lowest temperature: 15 on Jan. 16 (Record: Minus-16 on Jan. 22, 1930)
Hottest month (average): 40.5 degrees in January (Record: 91.7 degrees on July 1980)
Coldest month (average): 40. 5 degrees in January (Record: 21.7 in January 1918)
Most snowfall (day): 0.1 of an inch on Feb. 12(Record: 13.2 inches on Feb. 1, 2011)
Most snowfall (month): 0.1 of an inch in February(Record: 22.5 inches in February 2011)
Most rainfall (day): 0.91 of an inch on Jan. 29 (Record: 9.27 inches on May 26-27, 1984)
Most rainfall (month): 1.54 of an inch in January (Record: 18.18 inches on September 1971)
Highest wind speed: 30 mph on Jan. 30
Previous day with any rain: Feb. 12
Previous day with 1 inch or more of rain: Oct. 17, 2012
Previous day with any snow: Feb. 12
Previous day with freezing temperatures: Feb. 12
Read regular updates on Oklahoma's unpredictable weather and learn more about meteorology from the Tulsa office of the National Weather Service.

>> Visit the main weather page
>> Send us your weather photos
>> Meet the forecasters

Contributors
Staff Writer Althea Peterson started writing for the Tulsa World in March 2007 after previous stops at the Norman Transcript in 2006 and the Oklahoma Gazette in 2005. She followed her older brother from rural Wisconsin (with a public school that never seemed to call snow days) to the University of Oklahoma, but did not follow his pursuit to study meteorology. However, she tries to find as many opportunities to report on the weather as possible.

Staff Writer Jerry Wofford came to the Tulsa World in 2010 from The Manhattan Mercury in Manhattan, Kan. Originally from western Arkansas and a graduate of the University of Oklahoma, Jerry has lived in Tornado Alley his entire life and is one of those people who goes outside when the sirens go off.

Subscribe to this blog



Archive

 
Weather World's Blog Archive:

2/2013  1/2013  12/2012  11/2012  10/2012  9/2012  
8/2012  7/2012  6/2012  5/2012  4/2012  3/2012  
2/2012  1/2012  12/2011  11/2011  10/2011  9/2011  
8/2011  7/2011  6/2011  








Home | Contact Us | Search | Subscribe | Customer Service | About | Advertise | Privacy
Copyright © 2013, World Publishing Co. All rights reserved.