READ TODAY'S STORIES AND E-EDITION SUBSCRIBE |  CONTACT US |  SIGN IN
Sports Extra!



SPORTS EXTRA BLOGS

FOR THE RECORD
LOCAL PROS

ALL SPORTS

PHOTOS & VIDEOS

OUTDOORS

FIND A STORY

EMAIL ALERTS

SOCIAL MEDIA

RSS FEEDS

CONTACT US
BUY PHOTOS & PAGES

ADVERTISE ON SPORTS EXTRA


Print story only Print story with comments Email Twitter Facebook Pinterest
Anything for Money
Published: 6/7/2010 5:34 PM
Last Modified: 6/7/2010 5:41 PM

Here's where we are, kids.

Nebraska has the future of college football in its cold hands.

By choosing to go to the Big Ten, Nebraska would change the face of college football forever. The Big 12 would be tragically trashed. Nebraska would become the next Arkansas, bolting for money and future losses. And it would be a lot of money, more than $10 million extra, per year, probably. Who could turn that down? Since Arkansas joined the SEC, has it won a game of consequence of any type, or recruited a star player in Texas?

Which Texas player would go to Nebraska to play in Indiana?

None.

So what Nebraska has to decide is whether to preserve the conference history and charm, or take the money.

If Nebraska and Missouri lose themselves in the Big Ten for money, the six former Big 12 teams will join the Pac Ten, which is a disgrace, a joke, everything bad. Are Pac Ten games even on television? If they are, it's at something like 3 a.m. eastern time. Let's all hop in the van and drive up to Pullman for a game, leave Wednesday, return the following Tuesday.

Can't a TV package make up enough money to keep Nebraska?

A rivalry with Arizona and Arizona, what are you, nuts?

And what caused this nightmare scenario? Paying Mack Brown and Stoops and Saban and Carroll and the rest of those characters too much money, that's what. So because of stupid salaries throughout college sports, and up and down coaching staffs, the future of college football is anything for money.

Is it too late to take up a collection to keep Nebraska.




Reader Comments 27 Total

justanotherokie (3 years ago)
We may be seeing the beginning of the end of college football. It's frustrating when others can decide your destiny.

Pac 10, Blah. I'd rather go Div II or indy.

OSUNDN (3 years ago)
Why would stOOPS want to go out west when he and his overpaid players were so outclassed by USC? He's lucky BYU an Boise St. wants no part of the PAC 10. "What have you done for us lately Bob" better stay where he's at. The cheaters out west are far more clever than you!!!
MexiMike (3 years ago)
Picker, there is so much wrong with this blog that it isn't even funny.

First of all, this is NOT in Nebraska's hands. This is in Notre Dame's hands. If ND accepts the Big 10's invitation, nobody in the Big 12 is going anywhere. And in that case, Mizzou and their governor have a lot of apologizing to do.

With that said, if ND decides to stay independent then yes, this is in Nebraska's hands. If they defect, I have no problem with the state school's going to the PAC 10. You're making way too big of a deal out of game times. If most the teams that are leaving and playing in the same side of the future conference are in the same time zone, why would the times change at all? The only game times that may change are the match-ups with the West coast teams and that would only happen once, maybe twice a year. The PAC 10 is smart enough to schedule TV games at optimal times for maximum viewers. They are going to make a whole lot more money if they schedule OU/OSU or UT/A&M at 7pm than at 10pm.

I do agree though that revenue wars are killing college sports. What's next? Salary caps on coaches?
FIRE GUNDY (3 years ago)
Pick did you write this from Happy Hour? I just looked at the Pac 10's TV schedule from last year, and the latest kickoff would have been 9:15 our time. When do you go to bed?

Not only that, but the Pac 10 had 38 regular season games televised, 15 of them on ABC at what I would consider prime time.

In addition, the Pac 10 has six of the top 25 television markets in the country. By absorbing the Big 12 South, it takes on four more.

That's huge.
hootie (3 years ago)
Pick, as Meximike stated, I think you got Nebraska mixed with Notre Dame. Try a little research for a change!
mgsooner (3 years ago)
MexiMike = truth. This all comes down to Notre Dame.
Your Brain (3 years ago)
Notre Dame has no interest in moving to the Big 10, Pac 10, Big 12, ACC, the Big East, the A-Team or the Cobra Kai's. This whole thing falls on Nebraska's shoulders, and personally, I think they should leave.

Texas will never agree to a Big12 TV network, and the majority of the schools in the league have been content riding UT's coat tails for so long that no one in their right mind would think things will change.

Mizzou cant move without Nebraska, and as soon as Neb says "lets go" it will be "so long Big12, hello Big10". And OU, OSU, Tex, Tex Tech, Colorado and A&M can go to the Pac10, leaving ISU, KU, KSU and Baylor left to lay in the beds they made when they voted year after year in favor of policy's that were heavily favored by Texas, including the recent vote to have the Big12 Championship game in Dallas every year.
Your Brain (3 years ago)
Notre Dame has no interest in moving to the Big 10, Pac 10, Big 12, ACC, the Big East, the A-Team or the Cobra Kai's. This whole thing falls on Nebraska's shoulders, and personally, I think they should leave.

Texas will never agree to a Big12 TV network, and the majority of the schools in the league have been content riding UT's coat tails for so long that no one in their right mind would think things will change.

Mizzou cant move without Nebraska, and as soon as Neb says "lets go" it will be "so long Big12, hello Big10". And OU, OSU, Tex, Tex Tech, Colorado and A&M can go to the Pac10, leaving ISU, KU, KSU and Baylor left to lay in the beds they made when they voted year after year in favor of policy's that were heavily favored by Texas, including the recent vote to have the Big12 Championship game in Dallas every year.
The Picker (3 years ago)
Dear Pinheads: Notre Dame doesn't have a Friday deadline! Nebraska does.

A starting time of 9:15? Have you ever heard of the east coast? The audiences east of west for Pac Ten football are nothing.

Stoops playing USC and Oregon, etc., instead of Missouri? Ouch.

Any way you look at it, this is a nightmare.

But go ahead and pay the left guard coach $880,000. Get 'em all bonuses for winning those big bowl games. This is what you get. Zero tradition. A trashing of history. Greed run amok.

HuskerJake (3 years ago)
What conference history do you speak of Picker? NU's yearly rivalry game against... uh yeah. What has the Big XII really done for any school in the North? Most championship games are moving south, and isn't it Texas that blocked a move towards a Big XII network, looking more towards creating a Longhorn network (that now, not surprising, is reportedly including Oklahoma)?

I've attempted to read everything I can find on this topic, and I still haven't one good reason for the Huskers to stay in the Big XII.
GBR
DontHaveToGuess (3 years ago)
MexiMike, why do you argue with The Picker so much ? Just because he sometimes criticizes your precious OSU ? I don't know if he's completely right about OSU's adopting the spread or not. Heck Georgia Tech actually won a game against UGA with the wishbone, so sometimes things that are dead aren't completely dead. Tech did alright with what they did and now they're leaving it so this might be a good move. The Pokes did sort of look like they knew what they were doing in the spring game. But, on this Nebraska thing, I'd say The Picker is right ... again. Too bad the Big XII couldn't have that championship game alternate with KC though, that does seem unfair to the North schools and why create stupid friction over relatively smaller things ?
Loki (3 years ago)
Admitting this feels much like a root canal: Picker is spot on.

Throw tradition in the ditch. Geography, smeography. And, the PAC-10 East won't stay exclusively on this side of the Rockies.

Travel headaches? Quickly review Stoops' batting average on the left coast.

The root of this evil is money. Salary escalation, once loosed, is a hard monster to kill. For comparison: What's a .260 hitter really worth? Ask MLB.

This decision will be cemented BEFORE television contracts are negotiated. Fear of missing out will stampede the weak-kneed into bolting.

Finally, for HuskerJake: If Nebraska was nostalgic for rivalry games, it might have tried to edge out its weak sisters more often to get to the conference championship. Fire up the tractors and drive to your new rival---Iowa.
HuskerJake (3 years ago)
I think tradition was thrown in the ditch when OU opted out of playing Nebraska every year. Yes, it was OU's choice.
If the roles were reversed, I'm sure OU would be looking at every option to improve their situation.
FIRE GUNDY (3 years ago)
Pick you think there's an east coast TV audience for Big 12 football now? (or a west coast audience for that matter....)

It's called regional coverage. It's why my buddy in L.A. has to go to a sports bar to watch OSU because unless you have a satellite college football package it ain't on their regular cable channels.

I don't see how it's a nightmare. Tradition has already gone out the window, so I opt for watching more interesting football. I like the Pac 16 idea.
buster (3 years ago)
I see no reason to fold the Big 12 after Neb and Miz leave. Rename the league with 10 teams that are left, have each team play
everybody in the league. Without a championship game OU and OSU have a much better chance of going to a BCS game.
If they join the Pac 10 neither will ever play in a BCS bowl. Travel will get to them.
MexiMike (3 years ago)
@Donthavetoguess: Did you even read my entire post? I agreed with him on a couple points. I don't argue with him just to argue but if he says something I disagree with, I'll state my opinion. Simple as that. Let's move on.

@Buster: The conference needs 12 teams. Why do you think the Big 10 and PAC 10 are trying to expand? They need a championship game to have a better chance to land BCS bowls. Also, the travel argument is pretty irrelevant. For the most part, the teams that would move from the Big 12 will play the exact same teams they are playing now so the travel will have little impact.

@The Picker: The Friday deadline on Nebraska put pressure on Notre Dame having to decide sooner. The Big 10 needed an answer from them before Friday so that they could tell Nebraska by Friday whether or not they are invited. The point is that the invitation was always Notre Dame's first and Nebraska's second.

To be perfectly honest, I would prefer the Big 12 remain intact and the TV deal be renogiated so that the teams' revenue is more on par with the rest of the conferences. But if Nebraska does abandon ship, then the six Big 12 teams will do what they have to do to control their own destiny without being left behind.
MexiMike (3 years ago)
*negotiated.
NN (3 years ago)
Pac 16 East - Here we come! Go Pokes! Beat Zona!
buster (3 years ago)
Pac 10 and Big 10 have done very well putting their winners in a BCS bowl without a championship game.
It's just what Picker says it is about, money money money. The 10 teams left in the old big 12 will do just as well.
MexiMike (3 years ago)
Buster, that championship game is all about revenue as well. Everyone watches the SEC championship and the Big 12 championship games...not just the fans of those teams. On top of that if a conference has a championship game, the odds of them sending two teams to BCS bowls is much higher than if they didn't have a championship team. Look at last six years.

If ten works so well, why are the PAC10 and Big 10 trying to expand? Trust me, they want a championship game.
The Picker (3 years ago)
Husker Jake, you're pretty much right, looking at the money, there's no reason for Nebraska to serve tradition and history. Which is exactly what Arkansas said and did. No reason not to bolt for the bread. And it hasn't won a game in the big two sports since. If you want to compete in Michigan for players, there it is, have a go at it. It's going to be next to impossible to recruit Texans to play at Wisky, right?

This quick question, Husker Jake: What is old Tom Osborne doing running the Nebraska show? Wasn't he done decades ago?

Outside of USC, which is about to get smacked by the NCAA, Pac Ten football is about, oh, one third as good as the SEC. The late-night TV market is a joke. Which is why it is desperately trying to hook up with Big 12 teams.

Playing Arizona State instead of KU or K-State, get the barf bag.
The Picker (3 years ago)
Attention MexiMike and others who about that much, according to Fox, Nebraska will now start the destruction of college football as generations have known it. As of course suggested here. Had to believe Tom Osborne still runs things. But who can blame Nebraska, go for the bread. So much for Notre Dame having a thing to do with anything. OU and OSU fans, better start saving frequent flier miles and reading up on the joys of Cal and Washington State football. Oh yeah, one more thing, better get a road map of LA.
Glenn616 (3 years ago)
The conference expansions are all about one thing: money. If Nebraska thinks it can make more money by joining the Big Ten, they will join the Big 10.
MexiMike (3 years ago)
Attention Picker, who only reads and sees what he wants to in order to feel better about his half-right claims:

Notre Dame had control of this. Not Nebraska. The only reason Nebraska is a part of the Big 10 is because Notre Dame told them no. Once that happened, then yes, Nebraska was in the driver's seat...which is exactly what I wrote initially. But make no mistake. This all started with Notre Dame--not Nebraska.

Why is that so hard for you to wrap your brain around?

And why do you keep whining about this fictional travel issue? It doesn't make sense! Big 12 football teams merging with the PAC 10 will only have to go to the coast ONCE A YEAR. For the most part, the teams they will play ARE THE SAME ONES THEY ARE PLAYING NOW.

Again, wake the hampster up in your head and tell him to jump back on the wheel.
FIRE GUNDY (3 years ago)
Again Pick, just from looking at the PAC 10's TV schedule from last year the vast majority of their televised games were day games (even in our time zone).

Not only that, but give me the choice of jetting to Phoenix or Lawrence in the fall and I'm packing the sunscreen....
25 of 27 comments displayed  |  View All


To post comments on tulsaworld.com, you must be an active Tulsa World print or digital subscriber and signed into your account.


Out Pick The Picker

The Picker began entertaining – and infuriating – sports fans in 1993. Each week during football season, he writes about his picks of college and NFL games in his Thursday Sports column. He's never afraid of sharing his opinions about the game and the personalities who play it. Readers have a chance to go against him each season in the Outpick the Picker contest. He welcomes the competition.

Follow The Picker on Twitter


Subscribe to this blog


Archive

Past Articles By The Picker

1/31/2013
     The Picker: Super Bowl merely a distraction from OU woes
 
The Picker's Blog Archive:

2/2013  1/2013  12/2012  11/2012  10/2012  9/2012  
8/2012  7/2012  6/2012  5/2012  4/2012  3/2012  
2/2012  1/2012  12/2011  11/2011  10/2011  9/2011  
8/2011  7/2011  6/2011  5/2011  4/2011  3/2011  
2/2011  1/2011  12/2010  11/2010  10/2010  9/2010  
8/2010  7/2010  6/2010  5/2010  4/2010  3/2010  
2/2010  1/2010  12/2009  11/2009  10/2009  9/2009  
8/2009  7/2009  6/2009  5/2009  4/2009  3/2009  
2/2009  1/2009  12/2008  11/2008  10/2008  9/2008  
8/2008  7/2008  6/2008  5/2008  4/2008  3/2008  
2/2008  1/2008  12/2007  11/2007  10/2007  9/2007  
8/2007  7/2007  6/2007  5/2007  4/2007  3/2007  
2/2007  1/2007  12/2006  11/2006  10/2006  9/2006  
8/2006  





Home | Contact Us | Search | Subscribe | Customer Service | About | Advertise
Copyright © 2013, World Publishing Co. All rights reserved.