It doesnt count that tech beat TX after it was on the last play of a game. It also doesnt count that tech was ahead for approxiamtely 58 minutes of a 60 minute game before that last play. I mean c'mon that is like saying Iowa's win over Penn State didnt happen.

You tricked me Picker. I was ready for a phone call from Mack Brown crying again.

Picker, you never cease to amaze.
Why does Tech get thrown out over a close win in Lubbock? How about the OSU/TX game, which OSU very likely could have won if it had a better coach. And playing What If with the OSU game? What about the botched call on the OU fumble recovery, the one that never got reviewed? Wow, that takes away an opportunity for the OSU touchdown and likely would have allowed the Sooners to cash in on a short field. Funny you didn't mention that.
If you are the only one screaming about something, either you are a genius or an idiot. I wonder which you qualify for.
Yawn, its time for some new material Picker.

Gee Picker, just a little over a year ago you were saying Bradford just plain didn't have what it takes to be the big man in a big game. I disagreed with you then. He will only be better next year, at OU or in the NFL.

Pickster...credit where it's due...you are dead right about OU's inability to cope with a two-dimensional quarterback. But you were dead wrong about the OU - OSU game whereas I, on the other hand, pegged it. I called it OU by 17, they win by 20. Credit where it's due, indeed. See you in Acapulco.

Yes, OU got sooo lucky. But funny you don't mention the fumble that wasn't by Kendall Hunter that probably would have turned the game into a route.

Licker, It's time's like this that I remember why I call you that. Where do I begin to comment on your stupidity?
Let's start with our bet. Don't forget to leave my payment at Bros. Houligan, chump. Don't deny what I told you I would shove back in your face several months ago. You've already shoved it in my face that you expect ME to pay that OU in the championship game-bet, and now you're jumping up and down about predicting it?!! I have to stop there for a moment, because your hypocrisy and ignorance has overwhelmed me.....

OU scored on what, eight straight drives? They would have scored on the drive anyway, the volley ball pass just led to a quicker score.

OSU scored on the fumble that wasn't.

OSU scored on the sack avoiding throw away pass interference call. If the field was 10 yards wider it would have been a good call though.

It's sad to see the Texas teams left out - Missouri is weak and doesn't belong in a championship game, having already lost to Texas, Okie State, and Kansas. Unfortunately, we need the computers to help the idiot voters figure things out and to keep them honest, that was never more apparent than when the human polls were released Sunday and we saw the WILD and UNJUSTIFIABLE swing in Texas favor. Voters are crooked and self-serving, at least the computers realize that there were 11 other games played by these 3 teams this year. The voters seem to recall only one, and if that's what it's coming to, what's the point of playing more than 1 game a year? This voter bias is why we had to come up with the BCS in the first place. Texas had their butts handed to them by both Oklahoma and Tech (and were taken to the wire by OSU, in Austin) - they just happened to get VERY lucky against Oklahoma when Reynolds was lost for the season. Out of 120 minutes of football, Texas led for a total of 17 minutes in those 2 games - that means they were getting beat down for 103 of those 120 minutes - but I'm sure the voters are right, Texas is really better, after all - they beat OU for 15 minutes and Tech for a minute and a half.

Man....somebody woke up on the wrong side of the bed this morning! The facts are Mr.Picker that there was a three way tie at the end of the year- it doesn't matter who played who and where. I think the tie-breaking system that the Big 12 has in place stinks. If, however, one were to look at the whole situation subjectively (as it does not appear that you are) one could make arguments for and against any of the three teams. It's pretty low of you also to blame the scheduling as a reason for Texas to be the tie-break winner. They are very fortunate that they got to play OSU and Missouri at home. And I think the non-conference schedule should be brought up by you as well. I mean- does OU's considerably more difficult non-conference schedule mean anything to you?

Dear Picker:
I know you have lost a lot of money betting on football games and that you are a big bigot.
But even I cannot erase my team's loss to Texas Tech --the same Texas Tech OU beat by 40+ points. Quit trying, it makes you look stupid.
Also, don't go down that path of trying to bash the body of work idea while at the same time pointing out how the OU/OSU game could have been only a six point loss by the Cowboys.
It makes you look like a homer, and a stupid one at that.

Hey, what the heck happened to all the Oklahoma State fans who were so active with their comments prior to Bedlam?