READ TODAY'S STORIES AND E-EDITION SUBSCRIBE |  CONTACT US |  SIGN IN
Sports Extra!



SPORTS EXTRA BLOGS

FOR THE RECORD
LOCAL PROS

ALL SPORTS

PHOTOS & VIDEOS

OUTDOORS

FIND A STORY

EMAIL ALERTS

SOCIAL MEDIA

RSS FEEDS

CONTACT US
BUY PHOTOS & PAGES

ADVERTISE ON SPORTS EXTRA


Print story only Print story with comments Email Twitter Facebook Pinterest
Bad Calls Don't have to Stand
Published: 9/29/2006 10:38 AM
Last Modified: 9/29/2006 10:38 AM

First, Oklahoma lost a game directly from a bad officiating call.

Then, Oklahoma State lost a game when a bad call had a big impact on the game.

So, this week the debate about instant replay has continued in our state and two coaches, Tulsa's Steve Kragthorpe and OSU's Mike Gundy, made the best arguments yet against the current system.

In a nutshell, Kragthorpe and Gundy said officiating calls are being taken out of the hands of officials on the field and put in the hands of someone in the press box, hundreds of feet from the field.

Yes, the press box official has the advantage of replay. However, he does not have the advantage of being on the field and within feet of the action.

Plus, the type of decisions being reviewed makes no sense. How does a replay official know when forward motion is stopped? Does he hear the whistle of the officials? No.

As a result, his decision is made without the most important factor - when was the whistle blown.

The most important factor may be taking officials calls from the field to the press box. Yes, on some issues the replay can be helpful (as in the OU-Oregon). Then, on others, such as the OSU-Houston game, the replay shows nothing.

As a result, replay isn't the answer in all issues.

Kragthorpe and Gundy made the case this week that too many decisions are being made in the press box, far away from the field.

Gundy said he was talking with an official on the field and said both he and the official were in agreement - the Houston fumble was a fumble.

When Gundy questioned the official on the field, he was told the decision was out of his hands - it would be made far away in the press box.

For starters, the decision on when forward motion was stopped should not be a reviewable play. Secondly, how is a guy in the press box know when forward motion is stopped (by a whistle).

Either way, instant replay should be in for an extensive review this winter.




Reader Comments 1 Total

Jeremy (6 years ago)
Good read John. The blown call in Oregon was the result of officials on the field giving in to crowd noise/atmosphere...and was later amplified by a big time mistake (purposeful, in my honest opinion) by the replay official. There is no doubt in my mind, and noone will convince me otherwise, that those PAC 10 officials purposely blew those calls...at least to some degree. I umpired high school baseball for years. I missed several calls over the course of many games, but I am proud to say that I never blew one on purpose. I do, however, understand the emotions that the home crowd can evoke on officials, especially when the home team is coming from behind and is on a roll. Those PAC 10 officials fell victim in this situation. None of them could find the ball, so what the heck, give it to Oregon.

As for the replay official, if he had the necessary angles (and ABC says he did), then he just flat screwed up. He knew the correct call, but did not make it. THAT IS CORRUPTION...whether he did it for $$$ or for PAC 10 supremacy or for whatever reason. If he did not have all the angles, which were available for every needed replay prior to the onside kick, then his assistant is the corrupted felow (the assistant runs the technology). If neutral officials were used, this may not have happened.

As for the OSU game, the field referee obviously either didn't know the rules (a cardinal sin for any official in any sport), or chose not to abide by the known rule...which is again corruption. The replay official should also know the rules and let the field referee know that this particular play can not be reviewed.

In the end, instant replay has probably added 20 pages to an already loaded rule book. I am not sure that the time needed to try and get every call correct is worth the results we are seeing. In the NFL, where everything is standardized from stadium to stadium, replay is ok.

And to conclude my soapbox moment, I'll point out that someone who the nation would respect needs to step forward and admit that some officials simply stink. Most do a good job and bust their rump to get it right. But a few of them are either incompetent, or worse, dishonest. The idea that every official is an angel flying around with integrity dripping off his wings is naive. Sadly, the many people whose voice could be heard are making big $$$$ on college football, and thus won't consider the obvious.

1 comments displayed


To post comments on tulsaworld.com, you must be an active Tulsa World print or digital subscriber and signed into your account.


Klein's Korner

Tulsa World senior sports columnist John Klein is in his fourth decade of covering sports. He started his newspaper career at The Daily Ardmoreite in 1977 and moved to the Tulsa World in 1978. He served 10 years as sports editor for the Tulsa World before being named to his current position in 2005. He also spent five years as the Southwest Conference beat writer for the Houston Post. He has won many writing awards and is a former Oklahoma Sports Writer of the Year.

Follow John Klein on Twitter

Subscribe to this blog



Archive

 
John Klein's Blog Archive:

2/2013  1/2013  12/2012  11/2012  10/2012  9/2012  
8/2012  7/2012  6/2012  5/2012  4/2012  3/2012  
2/2012  1/2012  12/2011  11/2011  10/2011  9/2011  
8/2011  7/2011  6/2011  5/2011  4/2011  3/2011  
2/2011  1/2011  12/2010  11/2010  10/2010  9/2010  
8/2010  7/2010  6/2010  5/2010  4/2010  3/2010  
2/2010  1/2010  12/2009  11/2009  10/2009  9/2009  
8/2009  7/2009  6/2009  5/2009  4/2009  3/2009  
2/2009  1/2009  12/2008  11/2008  10/2008  9/2008  
8/2008  7/2008  6/2008  5/2008  4/2008  3/2008  
2/2008  1/2008  12/2007  11/2007  10/2007  9/2007  
8/2007  7/2007  6/2007  5/2007  4/2007  3/2007  
2/2007  1/2007  12/2006  11/2006  10/2006  9/2006  
8/2006  





Home | Contact Us | Search | Subscribe | Customer Service | About | Advertise
Copyright © 2013, World Publishing Co. All rights reserved.