READ TODAY'S STORIES AND E-EDITION SUBSCRIBE |  CONTACT US |  SIGN IN
Sports Extra!



SPORTS EXTRA BLOGS

FOR THE RECORD
LOCAL PROS

ALL SPORTS

PHOTOS & VIDEOS

OUTDOORS

FIND A STORY

EMAIL ALERTS

SOCIAL MEDIA

RSS FEEDS

CONTACT US
BUY PHOTOS & PAGES

ADVERTISE ON SPORTS EXTRA


Print story only Print story with comments Email Twitter Facebook Pinterest
Best of the Worst
Published: 12/18/2006 2:21 PM
Last Modified: 12/18/2006 2:21 PM

Two NFL quarterbacks have gotten, and are getting, about 90 percent of the TV press.

What's interesting about this story is that there is absolutely no reason for either quarterback to attrack more than, oh, four percent of the TV blabber.

The two quarterbacks who are all the rage are Michael Vick and Vince Young, a couple of below average quarterbacks on .500 teams about to miss the playoffs.

The TV love for Michael Vick is legandary. JoeTheisman seems to get light-headed just mentioning his name.

Vick just sent a new rushing record for quarterbacks and waved his thanks at the crowd during yet another loss.

His passing rating is off the charts. Downward.

Sunday, a CBS analyst came on the air and announced the Tennessee score and said: "The Vince Young legend continues."

Sunday, Vince Young completed 7 or 8 passes for a grand total of 50-some yards, surely one of the worst passing stats in the history of pro football.

Young was on the cover of Sports Illustrated recently.

He's playing all right. Like Vick, his passing stats lack quality wins.

Teams that win games too late are a dime a gross.

The other day when new Dallas quarterback Romo outplayed Vick all over the field, you hardly even knew the Cowboy was on the field, as the announcers ooh-ed and aah-ed six-yard runs by Vick, and then ignored passes knocking over the first-down sticks.

It is our contention that when it comes to NFL quarterbacks, you run to the golf course and throw for the playoffs.

The last running quarterback to win a Super Bowl was?

The fascination with running quarterbacks in the NFL is like a male-adoration kind of thing that would probably be passable in the Man Law cage.




Reader Comments 13 Total

Blair (6 years ago)
Was Steve Young considered a runner? Let us not forget one thing about Vick: He did have his team one win away from the Super Bowl two years ago. Young has proven nothing.
world picker (6 years ago)
I would say Steve Young was more of a scrambler than a runner.

Vick and Young are runners.

Got his team one win away from the Super Bowl?

Who hasn't?

Notice who wins all the Super Bowls. Passers.
TAB (6 years ago)
Steve Young was often second on the 49ers in rushing -- often had several hundred yards.

I see your point, but I don't think a quarterback who can and pass is a bad thing.

I tend to think that Michael Vick is actually pretty good but has one of the worst groups of receivers in the NFL. Sure, they do seem to to roll left quite a bit...

Vince Young deserves more time. I'll agree that he has been over-hyped, but that TD run last week was pretty sweet. I'll give him the benefit of the doubt and stash him on my fantasy team next year in the later rounds.

Doug Johnson and/or Mark Rypien are the last running quarterbacks I can think of -- they played in more of a grind-it-out era.
Blair (6 years ago)
Don't get me wrong Mr. Picker, I am all for the Peyton Mannings and Tom Brady's of the NFL. The formula for a Super Bowl is out there: Good defense and a quarterback that doesn't make crucial mistakes. That is why the Patriots won it three times. That is why the Colts won't win it. I think Vick is a good quarterback. He isn't as good as some say and he isn't as bad you say. He has won a lot of games in the NFL and has led his to team to the playoffs a few times. Just for future blog discussion reference, put me in the camp that thinks Ladanian Tomlinson might be the best running back ever. Talk about a good debate....
JJ (6 years ago)
All I've heard about lately is Drew Brees and Romo. Talk talk talk. Is Drees Brees the MVP? Talk talk talk. Then at the start of last night game, Joe Theismann was talking about how great Carson Palmer is and how he is the best precision passer in the league. Ha ha. Oh, I was laughing good. I didn't realize they put Theismann on MNF for comedy effect. I thought that was Kornheiser's job.
world picker (6 years ago)
It's science, quarterbacks cannot run, pass and win it all.
Jeremy (6 years ago)
I agree with the picker in that QB's who struggle to throw effectively will not lead a team to the promised land. I can name several "passing" QB's who can't read defenses well or hit the water if they stood on a beach...some of which happen to be pocket passers. The problem with running QB's is that they fail to develop into great passers, because they are always taking off when the pass rush closes in...as opposed to staying in the pocket, taking the hit, and delivering the TD or first down strike. If Vince Young or Micheal Vick could read and throw like Brady or Manning, you'd have the ultimate QB.

To win it all, it takes a good OL, a good QB who can complete a pass on that crucial 3rd and 8, and a good to great defense.

The Youngs and Vicks of the world get the attention because of the highlight reels they produce. Those rockets that Manning and Brady throw around the grid aren't sexy, but they get the job done. I also think that GM's and owners will gravitate toward these flashy runners for a few years because they put butts in seats and draw TV ratings. I don't think Micheal Vick is a great QB. Nor is Vince Young. But you can't help watching them just to see what happens next. It's either, "what a run!", or "what kind of throw was that?". Either way, it's entertaining.

Having said that, I hope my favorite team (Steelers)doesn't get one of these runners.

Jesse (6 years ago)
Come now, I agree with your point, but you haven't really backed it up. For one thing, Young's performance was far from one of the worst in history. It wasn't even the worst of the week (Philip Rivers: 8/23, 2 picks). As for no quality wins, what would you consider the Giants, Colts, and Jaguars? He doesn't deserve to go to the Pro Bowl yet, but for a rookie quarterback a lot of people thought would either never be good or take several years to develop he's done admirably.

And yes, Vick sucks and gets way too much credit. No argument there.
world picker (6 years ago)
Jesse: The original point was, these flashy running quarterbacks get far, far more publicity than they're worth.

It really is like a Man Law kind of OK beery crush.

Is it my imagination, or are Rivers and Brees running down a little?

One more thing: Everybody has heard of the expression, particularly horse players, you could be walking around lucky without even knowing it.

Sometimes it takes a while before you know you were really lucky.

Well, OU was lucky to have had Florida State in its national title game.....that quarterback is 0-17 in the NFL!!!!!
Jeremy (6 years ago)
I agree with your original point. It's just not going to change as long as they produce the highlights. The league is dominated by pocket passers, some good and some not, so the odds are always with a "non runner" to win it all. If the league ever got to be led by running QB's at a 50% rate, then the odds would dictate that a Micheal Vick or Vince Young would win it all. I doubt this will happen, but college ball seems to be gravitating toward these dual threat QB's a little.

As for FSU in 2000, Weinke was the Heisman winner and had his way with all the other defenses he faced. And remember, Heupel never saw a down in the pros. Isn't it amazing how some players dominate the college game and then can't pee a drop in the pros?

OU was definately lucky that season, and on more than one occasion. But, so is every Title winner. The Sears Trophy can't be won without good fortune, even if it's only in the form of avoiding back luck and injuries during a season.

I've always said that the line between #1 and #5 is often a very fine line. Take OU this season. They are one jam job and one 2nd half collapse from playing Ohio State for all the marbles. Several teams can say this, of course. I doubt OU could beat this Ohio State team more than 2 out of 10...but I'd have loved to seen them try.

Jeremy (6 years ago)
Let's talk bowls for a bit. I'm sure you have your Thursday picks section ready to go, so I'll type this in tonight in advance of your insight.

I like a couple of dogs in "pre Jan 1" bowls. Then, I like the favs after bringin in the New Year. Here's my top 4 choices as of today, in no particular order:

Kentucky +10.5 over Clemson in the Music City Bowl. Clemson staggered across the finish line after starting the season with BCS thoughts. Kentucky has improved and will be excited to be in this bowl. I'll take the focused SEC team (and the generous points) over a disappointing ACC team.

Georgia +2.5 over Virginia Tech in Atlanta (Chicken Fillet Bowl). This should be ahome game for the Bulldogs, and they are usually sharp in bowl games. Their QB is rounding into form. Tech is not a good bowl team, which is surprising with a coach like Beamer. Georgia wins outright here.

By the way...you notice the pattern here? Take dogs from great conferences over favs from bad conferences. Simple.

OU -8.5 over Boise St. Barring an OU turnover problem, I just can't see Boise staying on the field with the more talented Sooners. Oh, it'll be close for a qtr or two, but OU will wear down the Broncos in the trenches. Simply put, OU has the edge in this game in every matchup. Even the QB's are even, despite what some people may think. OU wins by 20.

Ohio State -7.5 over Florida. The Gators had some close games down the stretch, while Ohio State has dominated every opponent but Michigan (and maybe a close call at Illinois). I just love the Buckeye QB and his speedster WR's. The defense is solid as a rock, and will consume the gimmick Gator offense. On paper, Ohio State is better by a large margin. The large number also says that Vegas likes Ohio State. Looks like Tressel will raise the trophy for the 2nd time in recent memory...but there will be no controversy in this one.

As a bonus, I like Louiseville to handle Wake Forest (+10.5) in the Orange Bowl. That number is much bigger than you'd think it would be. Wake is the champ of the terrible ACC. Their record is better than they are in my opinion, as they were fortunate all year in the turnover battle. The Cardinals have a great QB who won't make mistakes. Cards big.

Chris (6 years ago)
Can we talk about Lexus High..er, Union for a bit? This whole thing troubles me. There were reports that the seniors voted on whether or not they wanted him to return. I didn't know coaching was done by democracy. Also, what character issues have arisn? Were there rumors he was sleeping around as before when a certain local basketball coach bolted? And today's story that Bill Blankenship said he had no control over who succeeded him. What a cop out! Has he forgotten he was also Union's AD? Has he forgotten that he suprisingly bolted and left Union without an exit strategy? Talk about cut and run! If I were Union, I would not, repeat, NOT take him back. He said he wants a college job. If one ever did come up, he'd probably just bolt again. Plus the president of the boosters are calling him a "legend"...a legend who can't find a coaching job. This isn't Steve Spurrier and Florida! There are some troubling issues at Union from top to bottom. Their coaching search starts with a lot of baggage!
world picker (6 years ago)
The high school stuff is a disgrace.
More on that shortly.
13 comments displayed


To post comments on tulsaworld.com, you must be an active Tulsa World print or digital subscriber and signed into your account.


Out Pick The Picker

The Picker began entertaining – and infuriating – sports fans in 1993. Each week during football season, he writes about his picks of college and NFL games in his Thursday Sports column. He's never afraid of sharing his opinions about the game and the personalities who play it. Readers have a chance to go against him each season in the Outpick the Picker contest. He welcomes the competition.

Follow The Picker on Twitter


Subscribe to this blog


Archive

Past Articles By The Picker

1/31/2013
     The Picker: Super Bowl merely a distraction from OU woes
 
The Picker's Blog Archive:

2/2013  1/2013  12/2012  11/2012  10/2012  9/2012  
8/2012  7/2012  6/2012  5/2012  4/2012  3/2012  
2/2012  1/2012  12/2011  11/2011  10/2011  9/2011  
8/2011  7/2011  6/2011  5/2011  4/2011  3/2011  
2/2011  1/2011  12/2010  11/2010  10/2010  9/2010  
8/2010  7/2010  6/2010  5/2010  4/2010  3/2010  
2/2010  1/2010  12/2009  11/2009  10/2009  9/2009  
8/2009  7/2009  6/2009  5/2009  4/2009  3/2009  
2/2009  1/2009  12/2008  11/2008  10/2008  9/2008  
8/2008  7/2008  6/2008  5/2008  4/2008  3/2008  
2/2008  1/2008  12/2007  11/2007  10/2007  9/2007  
8/2007  7/2007  6/2007  5/2007  4/2007  3/2007  
2/2007  1/2007  12/2006  11/2006  10/2006  9/2006  
8/2006  





Home | Contact Us | Search | Subscribe | Customer Service | About | Advertise
Copyright © 2013, World Publishing Co. All rights reserved.