I hope Bradford is alright. He looked pretty out of it on the sidelines.

Excuses, Excuses. Bradford does not play defense as well does he? The fact is OU is average at best. They have lost 2 of their 3 only true roads games and almost lost the third against a poor Iowa State team. The game at TU was basically a nuetral site. It is always easier to play at home than on the road.

Bradford being hurt certainly didn't help OU's chances, but they were going to lose this game anyway. Nobody wins in Lubbock at night, especially an OU team who's proven to struggle outside of Owen Field. If you thought OU was winning this game you must've been smoking some wacky weed. Also, it really hurts OU that Stoops doesn't insert his backups earlier in blowout wins so they can get valuable experience for games like last night. Halzle was so off for so many series before he got going that it was too late to come back from such a large deficit.

Scott you sound like an OSU fan. What's your favorite saying "Wait till Next Year"

I find it absolutely mind boggling that nobody mentions two things: kevin wilson's horrible playcalling, and the reviewed play at the very end of the game.

"Left Oklahoma to rely heavily on the run?" That's B.S. On only 1 of 5 possessions did OU run for the first play. EVerything else was a throw by a quarterback who is out of his league. Kevin WIlson's obvious dislike for the running game is appalling. T-Tech has consistently failed to stop the run all year, so what do we do? WE PASS? With a horribly uncomfortable quarterback. Which makes me wonder: just how much time would T-Tech have had to score in the 1st half if we would've moved the ball with the run game? It's an absolute travesty when an O coordinator FAILS TO SEE WHO HIS BIG PLAYERS ARE WHEN NEEDED MOST, AND INSTEAD OPTS TO PUT THE GAME IN THE HANDS OF A QUARTERBACK WHO IS OUT OF HIS LEAGUE.

The review could be called sour grapes by me, but the ball wasn't out. Both players had their hands on the ball, and both players had a foot inbounds. The ball never touched the ground, which means SOMEBODY CAUGHT IT. Then who? Manual Johnson had 2 hands on it, the Tech guy had 1. You tell me who had possession. Even if you say it's a tie, or possession couldn't be differentiated between the two, then A TIE OF POSSESSION ALWAYS GOES TO THE WR. THAT'S IN THE RULEBOOK. Once again, OU gets robbed in Lubbock, even after they sucked it up, the refs called everything on us and nothing on them, and our own offensive coordinator screws up. Why do you think Tech scored so many points? BECAUSE THE OU DEFENSE WAS ON THE FIELD FOR THE MAJORITY OF THE GAME. That's simple football...

scott:

no one ever talks about osu. it's cuz they suck. why should anyone be worried. the best thing you can hope for is ou to give you a 21 point lead in the 4th quarter to defend. i'm sure you have no idea how to do that though.

scott:

my name is rade, not rage.

i guess if stoops was a man, and was 40 years old, he could take it?

Scottii,

that's a dumb question. do i hold a coach responsible? of course i do. it's OU. it has tradition. they're expected to win championships, not just the odd Big XII game. That's the difference between OU and OSU. OU hires people who want to contend for championships, osu hires people who rants at a woman on a national conference, and then ironically calls himself a man. A 40 year old one at that.

I for one am proud that OSU is NEVER over-rated. They say we are crappy, but we are always better than crappy...well into mediocre territory...go OSU!

Who is this Bradford you speak of?