READ TODAY'S STORIES AND E-EDITION SUBSCRIBE |  CONTACT US |  SIGN IN
Sports Extra!



SPORTS EXTRA BLOGS

FOR THE RECORD
LOCAL PROS

ALL SPORTS

PHOTOS & VIDEOS

OUTDOORS

FIND A STORY

EMAIL ALERTS

SOCIAL MEDIA

RSS FEEDS

CONTACT US
BUY PHOTOS & PAGES

ADVERTISE ON SPORTS EXTRA


Print story only Print story with comments Email Twitter Facebook Pinterest
College Football Lock of the Year
Published: 4/4/2007 3:44 PM
Last Modified: 4/4/2007 3:44 PM

One of those nuts-for-OU Oklahoma City media guys masquerading as a journalist says that one of the running backs who has never played a down of major college ball reminds him of Reggie Bush!

This was the same one who said the OU women basketball team was a cinch to make this Final Four and would win a national championship inside two years.

These guys are SO funny! Early spring football reports have OU graded only slightly below the New England Patriots.

It is, as always, a bunch of bull. The guys with the wacko OU bias are like local meteorologists -- they spend 99 percent of their time being wrong, then NEVER admit it.

The OU women's basketball team doesn't only need to get more athletic (as we said here in September), it also needs to get more skillful.

About college football: It's all about the quarterback. Unless you don't have one. Then it's all about the alibi.

Texas 35, OU 13.






Reader Comments 63 Total

Charles (6 years ago)
Be careful, being honest can be hazardOUs to your health! These fans don't like it when it is not positive about the Sooners.
world picker (6 years ago)
Hey Charles:
You're right.
And that's why we have to keep being right!
QB is overrated (6 years ago)
Somewhat overrated, that is. OU proved they can win the Big 12 with a retread at QB. The guy threw duck after duck and Malcom Kelly just outjumped everyone. What the retread didn't do (until the bowl game) was turn the ball over. So you don't necessarily need a good QB. You just need an experienced one. Ohio State (2001) and Florida (2006) proved that. So you are half right.
geoff (6 years ago)
The Media need not apologize to ANYONE for speaking the truth. The OKC OU media homers DO overrate the sooners constatnly and they NEVER admit it! Kudos to the picker for having the intestinal fortitude to say something the sooner nation may not agree with. If you don't like don't read it.
world picker (6 years ago)
Geoff: Welcome to the BS-free zone, pal.

The only time a quarterback isn't important is when you don't have one.

The pro-OU media nuttiness is a show to behold, all right.

As much as Stoops is adored, it's hard to understand why he has turned into such a sourpuss with the media.

Don't want to cause any of the OKC media guys and gals heart paliptations, but numerous sources in USA Today had star runner Peterson down-graded out of the top five in the upcoming draft.

Being objective doesn't mean we don't love you.

It doesn't mean we don't appreciate great displays of skill.

It simply means we're not goofy.
W Smith (6 years ago)
Yeah, the OKC media goes a bit overboard on OU...so what? Check any major newspaper in a state with a major college team (and usually without any big-league sports distractions) and you'll find the same phenomenon. Jeez, I check into this web site every now and then and it seems like you guys are always beating the same dying horse. Why not take up parcheezi?
Bill (6 years ago)
W. Smith - I realize the OKC media are going to cover OU with a blanket. That doesn't mean they need to be "jock sniffers" about it! That's the whole point The Picker is making here.

Thank God we have one of the finest, most honest, tell-it-like-it-is journalists in the entire region to point out that there are some chinks in that OU armor!!
W Smith (6 years ago)
Yeah, that's the point that's being made ad nauseum...over and over...which is my point precisely. So these OKC sportsheads tend to be a bit biased...it ain't exactly news. What the Picker won't tell you is that he's a died-in-the-wool OU fan as well (even played baseball up there) and now he feels he has to do a 180 to prove he isn't a homer. That's every bit as disingenuous as what the OKC (and some Tulsa) writers do.
Charles (6 years ago)
The point is, assuming the picker is a fan, he doesn't let that bias him. This is very rare and appreciated when it occurs. It is nice that he is not a sycophant, which is so prevalent in this state.

Not being a "cheerleader", drinking whatever kool aid is being served this week, will cause negative reaction by the fans. To the pickers credit, he keeps on telling the truth.
Bill (6 years ago)
Smitty - listen to Charles. He'll help you find your way if The Picker can't.
Beach (6 years ago)
Has anyone seen video of DeMarco Curry in HS?
Did anyone watch the spring game yesterday? Anyone that has a clue about talent evaluation can tell that this kid is special. He is the most talented back in a deep OU stable. He will be a Heisman candidate before his career is over. That is the lock of the year. Oh, Yeah. I can't believe all I am reading about in todays TW is the QB stuff when Curry was and is the story. Not one word about him. UNREAL.
Beach (6 years ago)
OK, I misprinted Murray and wrote Curry. I also screwed up and navigated the site wrong and did not see the article about his special day in the extra. I will chide myself before The Picker can. I look like an idiot. BUT, I stand behind the rest of it. The lock of the year will be Murray winning the RB job and becoming the next great in Crimson and Cream.
world picker (6 years ago)
Hey, wow, this is nice, there's a lot of love and respect going on here at the site; except for the grumpy W. Smith, who, along with Dean Blevins and Al Eschbach probably think OU will win national championships in three, no, four, sports next year.



Listen, here is our official position on in-state teams: We love them all.



We simply hate homers. Homers waste everybody's time and contribute nothing and are never accountable.



We watched the OU spring scrimmage and have the following to report.



Not bad. Good, in fact. Much better than we expected.



The athletes are camera-ready.

Here's what this year comes down to (which is the same as last year and the year before): theory. Specifically, pass defense theory. Simply put: Can OU stop the pass?



We can't recall when, if ever, this administration stopped a good-to-great passing team. It puts up good stats in a run-nuts league. It has everybody back from a secondary that was frequently obliterated last year -- that's encouraging?



It's time for somebody in Norman to stop a pass or explain why it can't be done.



You blog-backers are the best.



W Smith (6 years ago)
The Picker's an 'unbiased' fan? It doesn't take a Freud or Jung to see that what he spouts isn't anywhere close to objective; what the Picker displays is a negative bias caused by a backlash from trying to NOT be a fan. Now granted, there are fans, there are Fans and there are FANS, and those of us who have lived long enough to know better realize that following the Sooners (or any other team) is far more fun if done so with a certain healthy objectivity - a view that the Picker hasn't achieved yet. Sorry. And his fan club needs to stop behaving like those morons who fawn over Rush Limbaugh on the radio...
W Smith (6 years ago)
And no, Sir Picker, I do not expect the Sooners to win a national title anytime soon, although it isn't an impossibility (remember 2000?...no one expected it then after the great draught of the nineteen nineties and only a fair 1999...remember 1950?...no one expected it then after our national title team graduated and newbies stepped in at many positions, including quarterback). This is precisely what makes it fun...neither the subjective "sycophant" nor the objective "pundit" has a true clue.
Bill (6 years ago)
Smitty - you probably should avoid reading The Picker. Stick with Dave Sittler, he'll candy-coat your Sooners enough to satisfy you.

I'm a TU fan, and there are times The Picker dings TU. I don't always like it, but I realize he's on target when he does it. He's not only unbiased, he's fun to read.

And, he doesn't respond to his own posts like you do! LOL
walt reed (6 years ago)
You folks spend a lot of time writing about OU.
The Sooner defense (secondary in particular) still misses Mike. I know this is re-hash of re-hash, but he was a wizard at getting average people in the the right coverages play after play.
Concerning being wrong, would you repeat your Tator Tot prediction?
world picker (6 years ago)
Any thoughts about the "paltry" crowd of 21,000 at the OU game?



Couple of years ago, didn't they used to have 21,000 at a closed practice?



Here's a never-fail "tell," body language that spells trouble.



When a coach or an athlete gets testy, there's a reason: bad news is coming.



Tiger Woods stomps off the course Saturday night, refuses to talk to the press.



Loses.



Speaking of golf, color announcer Nick Foldo did a horrible job and should be put on probation. He couldn't beat Tiger one-on-one, so now he takes the field and delights in Woods getting beat. Nick Foldo kept saying, with what sounded like glee, that he had a feeling it wasn't Tiger's week. One guy beat Woods, for heaven's sake. Hey Foldo, tell Tiger in person what you're telling us.



W Smith (6 years ago)
Walt, you're dead on about the OU defense missing Mike. But I think it was more than that...the chemistry between Stoops and Venables created a separate entity...sort of like Dick and Perry...together they were deadly; separately, they were ineffectual.

And to you, Bill...why is it that when anyone questions the Picker or his unquestioning posse of blithering yes men, they're automatically homers? Find yourself a good 12-step program.
TAB (6 years ago)
Not sure by the term "administration" in your earlier post, Picker -- but wasn't Florida State a really good passing team when OU beat them in the Orange Bowl?

If you mean the current group of staff and players, it seems like they beat Texas Tech last year. Tech was average overall, but they do sure throw the ball a whole lot and do it pretty well.
world picker (6 years ago)
Tab: No, Florida State was a joke passing the ball -- that quarterback was what in the pros, zero for 50?



Good passers have a solid history of tearing OU apart, namely with passes to halfbacks.



If you recall, when part of this coaching crew was at Kansas State, it lost the Big 12 title game to about a million straight pass completions to halfbacks.



OU has just been blessed to play in a league shy of great passers.



We'll see again this year, won't we.



OU's schedule is heavenly. Miami's offense is pitiful, it has the same quarterback and made about six yards in its spring game. Unfortunately for OSU, Georgia looked pretty salty in its spring game. Anybody with better athletes should stop an inferior team from passing. With equal athletes, it's coaching philosophy, isn't it.


TAB (6 years ago)
You keep digging yourself deeper and deeper, Picker. That FSU team, even if Weinke was a career backup in the NFL (he made it there a little late in life), was amazing on offense. No one gave OU a chance in that game. And since when does lack of success in the NFL mean you aren't a good college quarterback? I can think of plenty of fine college quarterbacks, Heisman winners, who just weren't physically cut out for the NFL: Jason White, Dorsey, Gino Toretta. There are several guys in the NFL who made it just because of physical ability and not because of success in college, like Gus Frerotte. I think your argument makes sense if you talk about OU defense after Stoops-extra-strength and the national championship team secondary left. Before that, OU's defense regularly abused some pretty good passing attacks, like the Texas offense under Simms (keep in mind, you picked Texas most of the time during that era -- they must have been decent). I think your point makes more sense in the current era. The OU defense isn't the freakish phenomenon it used to be. I really respect OU's system -- I think it's designed to abuse spread offense teams and gosh, it was fun to watch them abuse Nebraska, A&M, and Mizzou last year with their rinky dink offenses. I think the secondary might actually be pretty talented and it might be an issue with the pass rush. Oh -- another vaunted offense that OU beat last year: OSU (a team I think you said was the best offense in the country at one point). OU didn't dominate, but they sure slowed them down.
W Smith (6 years ago)
Careful TAB...your sound arguments buttressed by accurate facts and intelligent interpretations will have the Picker and his flock barking soon; you'll be labeled the latest homer.
Bill (6 years ago)
Smitty, there's no doubt TAB is a big time OU homer. And, he's been a thorn in the side of most writers on this blog.

On the topic of me defending The Picker: In my opinion, the Tulsa World has two writers who are far and away the most honest, unbiased and gifted - The Picker and Jimmie Tramel.

I'll stand up for either of them at any time.
Bill (6 years ago)
Back on topic here - If the officials ever start calling the offensive fouls or walking on Courtney Paris, we'll quickly see OU fade from our collective memory.

What is her vertical, by the way? Two inches? Three? LOL
25 of 63 comments displayed  |  View All


To post comments on tulsaworld.com, you must be an active Tulsa World print or digital subscriber and signed into your account.


Out Pick The Picker

The Picker began entertaining – and infuriating – sports fans in 1993. Each week during football season, he writes about his picks of college and NFL games in his Thursday Sports column. He's never afraid of sharing his opinions about the game and the personalities who play it. Readers have a chance to go against him each season in the Outpick the Picker contest. He welcomes the competition.

Follow The Picker on Twitter


Subscribe to this blog


Archive

Past Articles By The Picker

1/31/2013
     The Picker: Super Bowl merely a distraction from OU woes
 
The Picker's Blog Archive:

2/2013  1/2013  12/2012  11/2012  10/2012  9/2012  
8/2012  7/2012  6/2012  5/2012  4/2012  3/2012  
2/2012  1/2012  12/2011  11/2011  10/2011  9/2011  
8/2011  7/2011  6/2011  5/2011  4/2011  3/2011  
2/2011  1/2011  12/2010  11/2010  10/2010  9/2010  
8/2010  7/2010  6/2010  5/2010  4/2010  3/2010  
2/2010  1/2010  12/2009  11/2009  10/2009  9/2009  
8/2009  7/2009  6/2009  5/2009  4/2009  3/2009  
2/2009  1/2009  12/2008  11/2008  10/2008  9/2008  
8/2008  7/2008  6/2008  5/2008  4/2008  3/2008  
2/2008  1/2008  12/2007  11/2007  10/2007  9/2007  
8/2007  7/2007  6/2007  5/2007  4/2007  3/2007  
2/2007  1/2007  12/2006  11/2006  10/2006  9/2006  
8/2006  





Home | Contact Us | Search | Subscribe | Customer Service | About | Advertise
Copyright © 2013, World Publishing Co. All rights reserved.