READ TODAY'S STORIES AND E-EDITION SUBSCRIBE |  CONTACT US |  SIGN IN
Sports Extra!



SPORTS EXTRA BLOGS

FOR THE RECORD
LOCAL PROS

ALL SPORTS

PHOTOS & VIDEOS

OUTDOORS

FIND A STORY

EMAIL ALERTS

SOCIAL MEDIA

RSS FEEDS

CONTACT US
BUY PHOTOS & PAGES

ADVERTISE ON SPORTS EXTRA


Print story only Print story with comments Email Twitter Facebook Pinterest
Cover Charge
Published: 10/16/2006 4:12 PM
Last Modified: 10/16/2006 4:12 PM

Media coverage of the Tulsa football team stinks.

If we were to rank the football stories from the most recent Saturday, it would be in this order.

1. Peterson injured (again), out.

2. Tulsa wins, shoots to top of its conference.

3. Oklahoma State scores a bunch against a chump in a road victory.

4. OU beat a bum at home.

Just because Tulsa is the smallest university playing major college football doesn't mean it should get the smallest amount of coverage; just the opposite, its presence in the top 25 of the BCS chart should be a banner headline.

Saturday night, the Tulsa football game story was the third piece to run on all the TULSA TELEVISION STATIONS!

On the local ABC affiliate Saturday night, KTUL, the Tulsa score was read AFTER the Big 12 conference scores!

The local ABC station didn't even have any film of Tulsa's win! The weekend anchor babbled something about the game being so far away.

Coverage of Tulsa football from the Oklahoma City media yahoos is smug and condescending.

True, Tulsa hasn't beaten all that much.

But it has done a much better job than media fat-heads.










Reader Comments 15 Total

jay (6 years ago)
if a tree falls in the woods and there's no around, does it make a sound?

pretty much sums up tu football. if no one else cares about tu football why should the media?
jeremy (6 years ago)
you hit the nail square on the head. when tulsa played on national tv two weeks ago, the stands were half full.

the radio and tv people must give the people what they want. during football season, that order would be ou, osu, tie between tu and arkansas (at least in the tulsa area).

and as the picker pointed out, the timing was unlucky for tu this weekend, with the best rb to ever put on a sooner uni going down for the season and an osu wr going for three football fields in receiving yards.

the obvious truth is that few outside of the metro area care about tu, while the entire state is sprinkled with sooners and cowboys. the animal is norman based, so you can forget any big tu coverage. in my opinion, the buzz needs to really pump tu being in the bcs this week.

rick hicks (6 years ago)
coverage alway has stunk in the tw. i get my sports from the web for that reason. i like ou as much as any but tulsa should cover tu there home town team. who know a little promotion may increase attendance and allow tu to keep a coach longer!
michael smith (6 years ago)
what do you expect when the two premier state media sportscasters (blevins -- and holcombe) are on the payroll of the universities that they are supposed to be covering objectively..

lets face it. holcombe has to ask osu for a vacation day in order to attend a tu game. and, blevins would break his neck if stoops turned a corner fast.
ben kapp (6 years ago)
when tulsa played on national tv, the game was at 6pm on a tuesday. not the best setting for a large crowd.
but tulsa drew over 5 times as many fans as they have students. i don't see osu coming even close to that kind of support. they have a hard time drawing twice as many fans as students.
blair (6 years ago)
toughtless and ignorant post. you use the phrase "no one." no one implies that skelly stadium would be competely empty on game day. it hasn't been empty all year. attendance is frivolous in tulsa, always has been. tu will draw better when it become a consistent winner against big time teams. that hasn't happened yet. the tulsa media should care that tulsa is resurging as a football power in the midwest. without question, tulsa is atleast the second best team in oklahoma, and probably the best with peterson out at ou. the tulsa world has done a great job of giving tu its due. local television is a joke. jack bunds and the other moron are jokes to journalism. they have no knowledge of the local scene or sports in general. watching those two is like watching 'dead air'. we can hate on 6 all day for their obvious interest conflicts, but atleast they get video of the games.

mr. picker is right, here. jay is an embarrasment to sense.
world picker (6 years ago)
the fcc should unplug for 24 hours any tv station not having film of a local college team winning a game.

the fact that some media people are being paid by certain teams that they cover is flat-out shocking.

at the rock-bottom very least, these people should have the guts to come on the air and say: i am on the blankety-blank payroll. and now the sports.

how could anybody not have an interest in a local top 25 team?

here's how: you don't read enough.
world picker (6 years ago)
a local tv sports person having to ask for a vacation day from another university to cover tu, now that's funny, mr. smith, that is a comment of high intelligence.
mike (6 years ago)
i agree with you, mr. picker. ever notice on cnbc or cnnfn, when they report a story about their parent compaines (ge and timewarner) they say "parent company of this network"? that's called a disclaimer. it's code for "just so you know, these jokers pay me, so it's possible i could be slanting the story in their direction"

i would love to see dean blevins do that, let alone try and spell "disclaimer"
chris (6 years ago)
you're so right, it's crazy. at least someone in the media gets it.

and props to tw for giving the coverage it does. at least it does better than the other media outlets.
as (6 years ago)
"blevins would break his neck if stoops turned a corner fast."

now that's funny. and very true. i really like holcomb, but can't stant blevins. sports radio in this city stinks.

you can't stand to listen to the buzz. amature crap on a good day. and you can't even get a good signal in anyway.

so that leaves the animal. those guys are better to listen to, but are painful homers to ou. all of them! which is fine, but just at least admit it. none of them will, though, and will put the hammer down on anyone who calls them out.
jeremy (6 years ago)
you guys are gonna make me stand up on my soap box again.

first of all, dean blevins played quarterback for ou, so it is not a huge surprise that he might slant his opinions in an ou direction. i must say, however, that i've heard him call the coaches out more than once. and in what city do you think the animal is based? uh, norman is home to ou. it's an ou sports station first, and the animal makes no apologies for it, nor should it. 80% of the state of oklahoma breaths sooner football...they give the people what they want. accusing the animal of being an ou homer is hilarious. that's like accusing a tree of being made of wood. pretty obvious.

secondly, osu has good representation on that station. jim traber played qb for the pokes, and coach pat jones makes daily contributions. traber is constantly accused of bad mouthing ou. i'm not sure what station you are listening to.

as for tu, it's up to the city of tulsa to pump the hurricane. the buzz, based in tulsa, should give the golden hurricane the time and coverage they disserve. the picker was right in calling out the tulsa tv news for not highlighting tu football. it was unfortunate that peterson went down on that day, and osu had a huge game from a wr. but no matter...tulsa news should have really given tu some props. the animal is broadcast in tulsa because people there want to hear about ou and osu, not because tulsa is there. if you expect the animal spend the majority of its air time on something other than ou football, especially in the fall, then you are kidding yourself.

again, the tu golden hurricane disserve great coverage with the season they are having and their outstanding coach at the helm. the responsibility falls on the university to market, the fans and alumni to demand the attention, and the city of tulsa media to deliver.

world picker (6 years ago)
these are fantastic thoughts and comments.

it's like group therapy, very healthy.

it's good to know that that numerous sports fan can see right through the bad sports coverage.

rr (6 years ago)
jeremy: first of all, install a spell checker on your computer! secondly, your remarks are remarkably unintelligent.

contrary to popular belief, the tulsa sports fan's schedule does not revolve around ou and osu. it would be foolish to think that tu has as many fans as the the two state schools, but the fact remains that tu football is becoming very popular in this city.

for your information, the proof is in the crowds. that terrible crowd you are talking about from the southern miss game was around 22,000 people. that may not seem like alot, but considering the fact that it was on a tuesday night, on television and that tu has an enrollment of 4,000 and a large portion of its alumni don't live in the state, i'd say the city is pretty interested. also, tu has had two other home games versus non-descript opponents and had over 25,000 in the stands and even more that were not counted in the turnstiles. not to mention 17,000 people traveling to memphis for last year's liberty bowl.

if you can get out of your little "norman world" and realize that life does exist beyond the 60,000 yea-hoos at owen field that join the 25,000 real fans and alums for an ou home game, then you would realize that tu's numbers (given the size of the school) are actually indicative of a high amount of interest in the city of tulsa.

as for osu, well lets just say that, aside from ou, they consistently draw about 10,000 more fans to lewis field or boone pickens stadium or whatever they are calling it this week than they did for any other home game.

sorry for the long diatribe...now, school's out sucka, i hope you learned something!

oh, one more thing...as for the local tv media?? what do you expect?? jerkens is a true pro, but doesn't anchor on the weekends...holcomb is employed by osu, mike wolfe is solid, but he is bound to the rules that his station sets forth which is to cover ou and osu with high intensity and if there's any time left, get some tu in...then the rest of the guys are simply not qualified to work the positions they have in this market. don't mean to hurt anyone's feelings, but it's true.
stan (6 years ago)
"sorry for the long diatribe" - that was a good one!

reading between the lines, i'd say that many here agree that the media coverage in tulsa forgets about the best team in the state, tu. now that mr. petersen can't play at ou, perhaps more coverage will head this way for the utep game in about a week.

i'm not holding my breath.
15 comments displayed


To post comments on tulsaworld.com, you must be an active Tulsa World print or digital subscriber and signed into your account.


Out Pick The Picker

The Picker began entertaining – and infuriating – sports fans in 1993. Each week during football season, he writes about his picks of college and NFL games in his Thursday Sports column. He's never afraid of sharing his opinions about the game and the personalities who play it. Readers have a chance to go against him each season in the Outpick the Picker contest. He welcomes the competition.

Follow The Picker on Twitter


Subscribe to this blog


Archive

Past Articles By The Picker

1/31/2013
     The Picker: Super Bowl merely a distraction from OU woes
 
The Picker's Blog Archive:

2/2013  1/2013  12/2012  11/2012  10/2012  9/2012  
8/2012  7/2012  6/2012  5/2012  4/2012  3/2012  
2/2012  1/2012  12/2011  11/2011  10/2011  9/2011  
8/2011  7/2011  6/2011  5/2011  4/2011  3/2011  
2/2011  1/2011  12/2010  11/2010  10/2010  9/2010  
8/2010  7/2010  6/2010  5/2010  4/2010  3/2010  
2/2010  1/2010  12/2009  11/2009  10/2009  9/2009  
8/2009  7/2009  6/2009  5/2009  4/2009  3/2009  
2/2009  1/2009  12/2008  11/2008  10/2008  9/2008  
8/2008  7/2008  6/2008  5/2008  4/2008  3/2008  
2/2008  1/2008  12/2007  11/2007  10/2007  9/2007  
8/2007  7/2007  6/2007  5/2007  4/2007  3/2007  
2/2007  1/2007  12/2006  11/2006  10/2006  9/2006  
8/2006  





Home | Contact Us | Search | Subscribe | Customer Service | About | Advertise
Copyright © 2013, World Publishing Co. All rights reserved.