READ TODAY'S STORIES AND E-EDITION SUBSCRIBE |  CONTACT US |  SIGN IN
Sports Extra!



SPORTS EXTRA BLOGS

FOR THE RECORD
LOCAL PROS

ALL SPORTS

PHOTOS & VIDEOS

OUTDOORS

FIND A STORY

EMAIL ALERTS

SOCIAL MEDIA

RSS FEEDS

CONTACT US
BUY PHOTOS & PAGES

ADVERTISE ON SPORTS EXTRA


Print story only Print story with comments Email Twitter Facebook Pinterest
Dear Mr. Stoops Sir: What are you doing?
Published: 1/3/2008 12:44 PM
Last Modified: 1/3/2008 12:44 PM

It is widely thought by America that Oklahoma can't tackle.

That is incorrect.

Oklahoma's offensive linemen are among the best tacklers in the history of college football.

We here at the Picks have been trying for years to prepare you for moments like this: A 260-pound guy with a mohawk outruns the OU defense for a 55-yard touchdown!

The offensive co-ordinator (from Northwestern!) was quoted as saying, after observing a New England Patriot pre-season practice, that he was not impressed with Tom Brady's arm strength!

For the first time in football history, OU was out-coached by a team with no coach: Medium Game Bob goes for a two-point conversion with six mintues to go in the third quarter, then slays momentum with an on-sides kick flub!

OU media homers have already come up with this euphemistic solution: OU needs to change its bowl preparation!

Yeah, sure, that's it, go a day later, wear different color shirts, let the offensive linemen eat only six bacon double cheeseburgers per lunch.

Here's what OU needs to do: coordinate better.

On offense:

Don't run into ten-man lines.

Dump the "I" formation, what do you think this is, the 70s?

Improve the hideous play-calling: Has OU ever thrown on a first and goal situation?

Have better tight ends ever been used worse?

Get creative: are new plays ever added?

Try to do something about Bradford's glass jaw.

On defense:

Think about taking away what the opposing offense does best.

Recruit a cornerback.

Think about change.

To repeat, now that you have seen that we've been right all this time:

Heupel was most responsible for OU's national championship almost one decade ago.

The co-ordinators have some big-time explaining to do.




Reader Comments 35 Total

AG (5 years ago)
Wow - thats one way to forget about the '07 Fiesta Bowl.
Bill (5 years ago)
Once again, the picker is right!
ALPHA DOG (5 years ago)
When is this year's Fiesta Bowl?
FirstEdition (5 years ago)
Right on Picker. Does anyone have Stoops email address so we can forward him your blog? I am no longer an OU fan, enough is enough. I realize now that I have only been going through the motions the last few years anyway. Heck, I didn't even go to school there(TU). I can't stand Stoop's arrogance, certainly. What is worse, arrogance without being able to back it up on the field, no question. The only thing worse would have been losing to a Hawaii team, which I bet would have happened if they had been OU's opponent!
Frank (5 years ago)
What Bob Stupid needs to do is quit recruiting shoplifting thugs from Texas. The OU team has sooooooooo many Texicans on the team, I didn't realize they were Oklahoma University. They surely don't represent Oklahoma very well!!!!!!!! Screw OU!!!!!!!!!
It's Possible (5 years ago)
If you try real, real hard, it is possible to give credit to another team. I know it sounds radical. But UO has no birthright to always win. Especially when the other team has faster, tougher players. Just accept it. No, the onside kick did not help and hurt quite a bit. But why do you think recovering an onside kick would have enabled the UO defense to tackle #7 any better?
WORLDPICKER (5 years ago)
That 260-pound guy with the mohawk deserves a ton of credit for running 55 yards without falling over with laughter, alone as he was.

The reader is right about getting the on-side kick -- the offensive coordinator would have run twice up the middle and then would have gotten sacked passing on third down. With 260-pound guys outrunning your entire defense, you simply don't want to hand over the ball on your 38.

Losses like this are given more time than they're worth because neutral fans spend the entire season hearing from homers on the payroll about just how great OU is again. The hope is games like this might tone down the cheerleading some.



stogdiddy (5 years ago)
Speaking of Homers on the payroll, I placed a comment on one of the Homers belonging to this very puclication. I stated how I found it interesting that he chose the word "mighty" to descrive the Sooners: interesting being if one defines "mighty" as continually going to the highest-profile bowl games only to choke in the process.

I made my comments prior to last nights debacle (only to have the mighty Sooners prove my point), and as such I have offered up alternate adjectives for these Homers to consider (staying close to home by choosing other "m" words): how about meager, miniscule, mortal, mediocre and (my favorite) merry.

Try some of those on for size, Sooner faithful.
eric (5 years ago)
Its absolutely amazing how true this blog is. How embarrassing to be an OU fan today. I feel like I am watching Temo Bowl (Nitendo 1987) with Wilsons play calling. 3 plays to choose from and my opponent is looking at my controller and knows exactly what play I am going to run. At least when playing the game I could slug my buddy and call him a cheat. Watching Wilson is a million times worse....just sit there and take it...knowing that he'll probably get another raise after this game. I blame this on coaching...Stoops obviously set a tone for this game (more like vacation) with lack of preparation throughout the week. Hearing stoops defending his on side kick sharrad almost verred to the side of insanity. Does he really think that he can justify one of the worst calls in history (well if you add up back to back bad calls with the 2 pt conversation..it might take the cake)? Does he think that everyone else is wrong and he is right? You go all year playing more conservative than anyone and then with a flash of brilliance decide to do it at the most inopportune time. What are you BOB STOOPS of 1999? No..your not....you were smart about it then....back up your arragance with wins and noone cares...do it and loose..your a joke. Espn and everyone else that watched the game last night has a pretty good idea of which role the Sooners have been playing for a while now.
BOB STOOPS (5 years ago)
Okay, we blew it: too much recruiting and not enough game prep. Malcolm Kelly is a wiener. Kevin Wilson likes to copy plays from Michigan's 1984 playbook. Brent Venables is running a radical experiment by having his linebackers play 10 yards off the line of scrimmage against a running team. Bobby Jack Wright can't coach DBs even if he can recruit them. Can't wait to see Granger in his $60 Burlington Coat Factory jacket. Time for me to hire a bona fide, top notch defensive or offensive coordinator because my two top guys are just not getting it done. Boomer!
fredde (5 years ago)
from the first series i got nervous. you could tell it wasn't their night they seemed to be disinterested and bored. all the bowl teams that seemed to be winning arrived with a sense of purpose and desire i.e. KU, mizzou, mich etc. the only purpose (in OU's eyes) for this game was to bury the ghost of last years loss and revive the tarnished reputation of "big game bob". by the way i noticed that frank beamer of VT also now has a 4- game losing streak in bowl games but never saw that in the crawl that announced the games on espn.
by mid 2nd quarter i had to mute the tv, too painful. after halftime i had to turn off the tv and listen to the radio broadcast. when ou got within 5 points and tried the onside kick merv defended stoops while bob berry continually referred to it as the turning point of the game, you could feel the tension between them as the old coach defended the call and the announcer/fan intimated what a stupid call it was. by the way bob berry is the worst play by play announcer (as you have pointed out many times) i would be surprised if he is back next year, it's unprofessional to keep making silly mistakes in calling the games. there 's an ugly rumor going around that just before WVU completed that long td pass that the OU players were heard calling across the line of scrimmage to qb white to stop running the ball.
wr (5 years ago)
Good morning Mr. Picker.
The blog looks like a lot teenage girls expressing themselves.
The guys in the Coon Skin Caps dominated the line of scrimage. Both sides of the ball.
The picker could have been the offensive co-ordinator, the results would have been the same.
Did you notice the refs simply stopped calling holding on the offense.
The O and D lines have been suspect all season.
Dean Blevins, on his 11:00 am slot (before the game) called the correct outcome and why. Pretty staight for a homer huh?
Adam (5 years ago)
I love how everyone is so hard on the Sooners when they lose. They only lost three times this year, so I guess you didn't have many oppertunites to get your punches in, so you've got to take them now. Stoops is one of the top three coaches in college football. If he left OU, he could take his pick anywhere else. How many programs have been better than us since 2000? Maybe two or three? We're a top 10 team every year.

Onside kick: Recover and you're a hero, fail and you're an idiot.

We got beat by a great team. We'll probably be ranked around 10th in the final poll. We were the 2nd best team in the BigXII this year (Kansas).

We also played without 4 defensive starters and our best two offensive players.

the program is fine, we'll be rated in the top 3 in the preseason polls if all of our players decide to return.

We're a powerhouse program and will remain so.

Congrats to the players for earning another BCS boll and that $3.5mil payday.
Adam (5 years ago)
I love how everyone is so hard on the Sooners when they lose. They only lost three times this year, so I guess you didn't have many oppertunites to get your punches in, so you've got to take them now. Stoops is one of the top three coaches in college football. If he left OU, he could take his pick anywhere else. How many programs have been better than us since 2000? Maybe two or three? We're a top 10 team every year.

Onside kick: Recover and you're a hero, fail and you're an idiot.

We got beat by a great team. We'll probably be ranked around 10th in the final poll. We were the 2nd best team in the BigXII this year (Kansas).

We also played without 4 defensive starters and our best two offensive players.

the program is fine, we'll be rated in the top 3 in the preseason polls if all of our players decide to return.

We're a powerhouse program and will remain so.

Congrats to the players for earning another BCS boll and that $3.5mil payday.
MIKE (5 years ago)
Ok, no more whining about injuries/suspensions. Every team has them! This is why the football gods created depth charts. Besides, are you trying to tell me that the OU squad they had out there the entire night is less athletic/talented than the 5-7 Pitt team that WV lost to on their own field? I severely doubt it. Prepare your team correctly, call the right plays and schemes, and it shouldn't matter. The bottom line is OU went into the game with the wrong attitude. They were upset that they weren't in the national championship game and had to instead settle for this chump team that should just bow to them and accept defeat. Honestly, I think if OU were in the BCS championship we would have seen a much different team.

p.s. Eric, the Nintendo game you are refering to is Super Tecmo Bowl and it was/is amazing!
Charles Howerton (5 years ago)
Couch Stoops admitted that he was out coached and out prepared in the 3 losses that they had this year, so my solution is the OU atheletic dept should consider having a co-head coach coordinator for the team and hiring Mark Mangino to fill the other spot. Maybe then the Sooners can not be outcoached and not prepared.
Jason (5 years ago)
Guys, OU might have had a few starters out, but Kelly at receiver would not have won this game. Chaney just picked up where Kelly left off. And De'Marco was not going to help that terrible offense. The only player that could have helped was Granger, but losing by 20 points means that missing a couple of starters would have maybe meant losing by 13.

They were out-coached and out-played and every year we hear about how GOOD OU is and that is always over-hyped. We hear about how GREAT OSU is going to be and that is always over-hyped!

I am going to be supporting the team that actually is good, TU!
Greg (5 years ago)
Injuries were definitely a factor in this fiasco: If Demarco Murray would have been healthy he would have been inserted in maybe three offensive series and probably would have scored in two of them.

The defense was good enough to keep OU in the game in the first half...if only the offense could have been productive.

The offensive line played clean on the first series then saw what that got them.

If you get the onside kick you are a genius and if you don't you are an idiot. Why strive to be either so early in the game?
WORLDPICKER (5 years ago)
Charles Howerton makes a better point than he might realize.

OU coaches could learn a lot from the KU film.

Best athletes -- quick, nimble guy -- at cornerback, the most important position on the field.

Great play-calling. Second and six, KU throws the stinking ball for a first down, wins the game, no dumb run against a ten-man line.

Would move the KU quarterback above Bradford, after that gutsy performance.

Might list Bradford about fourth in the conference now.
Adam (5 years ago)
OU was/is not over hyped. We will finsih in the polls about the same place we were in the preseason (around 10th).

to answer Greg's question about going for the onside early: They weren't expecting it. If you wait til late in the game when you MUST go for it, you're chances of success decline rapidly. They didn't do a great job of fielding the kick, OU just screwed up on the kick (didn't get 10 yards).

Believe me, I've never been more angered by a play than our 3rd and 2 and we threw for 1.5 yards and stepped out. There were plenty of bad decsions, but not nearly the doomesday scenario many are making it out to be.

All the state teams ended up right where they should have been. It's really where they were all along, even preseason. TU competes for the WAC, comes close, fails. OSU is a middle pack BigXII team, plays in mediocore bowl. OU makes arguement for Natl Championship, plays top 10 team and loses (after just beating a higher ranked team in the BigXII ship).

Bradford being 4th in the conference? Bradford lost ONE game this year. What other B12 QB can say that aside from KU?
robin (5 years ago)
Let's all agree that Worldpicker is the most insightful sports writer in America today, and that he requires anonymity in order to give voice to opinions so radical and brilliant that the cost of safeguarding him from impassioned detractors would be greater than the cost of protecting all former living presidents combined.
FAN (5 years ago)
OSU fans talking smack again? It's okay . . . we understand. You’re bitter and it's not your fault. You get your butts kicked so much by OU. No Big-12 football titles . . . no football national championships. OU penis envy must be a terrible thing to deal with.
Besides, it also gives all of you a chance to deflect the bad memories of past seasons with a drunken basketball coach and arrested basketball players, Chris Collins, Marcellus Rivers, and many more, not to mention "I’m Forty . . . I'm A Man." I would keep going but I could get carpal tunnel. You get the message by now, I’m sure.
Happy 2008 to all of you in Booneville. We really do understand!
Sooner/scooner (5 years ago)
The problem is not necessarily with the coachs and coordinators, the prblem is with the lacksadasical attitude of the players. The got Sooner fever and thought all they had to do was roll the red helmets on the field and they would win. That mental attitude did not work at Colorado or at Tech (as soon as the team say Bradford in the fog). In the Big 12 Chanmionship against Missiouri, OU was the underdog in the polls and had something to prove (even if the oddsmakers favored OU).

The mental part of college football is almost as important as the physical. WV lost ot PIttsburg which is a bottom 30 team at best. But WV was ready the other night. The Sooners were not ready to play, they wanted to be in the National Championship, but did not want to do the work to get there.

It also takes abit of luck to keep 18-22 year olds in line for 16 weeks and not have the crucial players make stupid mistakes like Grainger. The coachs and coordinators have to get the players ready to play but it often does not work. Sometimes the team needs players who act as leaders and will not lose--time may run out sometimes, but they cannot be beat.
Mark V (5 years ago)
In this day and age of parity, I can't see how any team can say their talent overmatches another's any longer - especially in bowl games.

Missing DeMarco Murray and Malcolm Kelley were not factors. Was not WV missing their superstar running back and other players, too?

It's about preparation, coaching, and most of all, attitude. And that lack of edge is why OU lost the "Sooner Magic."
steve (5 years ago)
i wonder where the NIT PICKER is right now?
25 of 35 comments displayed  |  View All


To post comments on tulsaworld.com, you must be an active Tulsa World print or digital subscriber and signed into your account.


Out Pick The Picker

The Picker began entertaining – and infuriating – sports fans in 1993. Each week during football season, he writes about his picks of college and NFL games in his Thursday Sports column. He's never afraid of sharing his opinions about the game and the personalities who play it. Readers have a chance to go against him each season in the Outpick the Picker contest. He welcomes the competition.

Follow The Picker on Twitter


Subscribe to this blog


Archive

Past Articles By The Picker

1/31/2013
     The Picker: Super Bowl merely a distraction from OU woes
 
The Picker's Blog Archive:

2/2013  1/2013  12/2012  11/2012  10/2012  9/2012  
8/2012  7/2012  6/2012  5/2012  4/2012  3/2012  
2/2012  1/2012  12/2011  11/2011  10/2011  9/2011  
8/2011  7/2011  6/2011  5/2011  4/2011  3/2011  
2/2011  1/2011  12/2010  11/2010  10/2010  9/2010  
8/2010  7/2010  6/2010  5/2010  4/2010  3/2010  
2/2010  1/2010  12/2009  11/2009  10/2009  9/2009  
8/2009  7/2009  6/2009  5/2009  4/2009  3/2009  
2/2009  1/2009  12/2008  11/2008  10/2008  9/2008  
8/2008  7/2008  6/2008  5/2008  4/2008  3/2008  
2/2008  1/2008  12/2007  11/2007  10/2007  9/2007  
8/2007  7/2007  6/2007  5/2007  4/2007  3/2007  
2/2007  1/2007  12/2006  11/2006  10/2006  9/2006  
8/2006  





Home | Contact Us | Search | Subscribe | Customer Service | About | Advertise
Copyright © 2013, World Publishing Co. All rights reserved.