I would have to completely disagree. As far as I could see, Bradford hit plenty of open passing windows all game. The difference was Florida's ability to come up with the big plays. See the goal line run stuff, blocked field goal, the 10 times tipped interception, and the Inglesias steal interception and the penalties that killed our first two drives. The gap in athleticism and talent between OU's skill players and Florida's corners was marginal at best.

I think the main difference was HARVIN and TEBOW and the pressure they put on a defense. I think OU did a good job as seen by the number of 3rd downs forced. The big plays killed them and the above mentioned plays made by Florida sealed the deal. I saw very few opportunities where Florida's receivers were dominating our corners. So, the fastes receiver corps was pretty limited against our corners.

You are way over simplifying the issue.

On a brighter note the overall play of the OU secondary was indeed vastly better this season compared to the last 4 years.

Haven't seen many comments about OSU and Tulsa.Kind of like the dollar movies I guess.
Congratulations on The Downtown Ball Park. Novel idea. Unique. Farsighted. Leading the way.
I guess you could build a downtown around it.
The river is nice.

I didn't see much difference in athletic ability at any position. No doubt Percy Harvin was a difference maker, but I've seen DeMarco Murray look just as good.

However, what I did see is a coach and a staff that, when matched against athletics of equal talent, are inferior. Kevin Wilson's play calling was horrid throughout the game. That may work against OSU. It doesn't against Florida.

And par for the course, Urban Meyer simply outcoached Bob Stoops by making the appropriate half time adjustments. Hello Mack Brown and Texas.

I had no dog in the game. But if you would have asked me at halftime, I would have told you Oklahoma looked the superior team.

Where did Florida make the plays that won it the championship?

Cornerback, you pinheads.

The Big 12 puts its best players on offense and has secondaries resembling fraternity teams.

What can be done?

Well, quit babying the OU coaching staff for one thing.

After five straight stinkers, how can change sound radical?

After five straight clunkers, getting there is not enough. Ask Buffalo.

The OU defense looked better because Tebow couldn't hit the end zone from the 20. He'll spend next year trying out for the pros, he'll quit running so much and will look like Vince Young.

Bradford?

He should come back for another year.

They'll use him like a wishbone in the bigs.

Epphan, it'll make Bronco Tebow more comical.

Same thing happens to all those option college quarterbacks, they use their last year as one big, fat NFL tryout.

Look at that West Virginia guy, he ran the nation under; then he started dropping back and auditioning for the pros and looked like everybody else.

A pro linebacker would treat one of Tebow's cute little jump passes like a doberman would a steak bite.

Thanks, Pick. Agree.
But believe SEC should funnel a couple of DBs toward the basketball court.

Stoops has lost five straight bowl games.

You're saying because Heupel worked miracles EIGHT YEARS AGO, Stoops has a free pass from everybody, just like the in-state media gives him?

Isn't the statute of limitations seven years?

The point is, when you lose FIVE STRAIGHT BOWL GAMES, something is wrong.

Stoops is terrific; it's past time for him to win a bowl game.