READ TODAY'S STORIES AND E-EDITION SUBSCRIBE |  CONTACT US |  SIGN IN
Sports Extra!



SPORTS EXTRA BLOGS

FOR THE RECORD
LOCAL PROS

ALL SPORTS

PHOTOS & VIDEOS

OUTDOORS

FIND A STORY

EMAIL ALERTS

SOCIAL MEDIA

RSS FEEDS

CONTACT US
BUY PHOTOS & PAGES

ADVERTISE ON SPORTS EXTRA


Print story only Print story with comments Email Twitter Facebook Pinterest
'Death to the BCS' and playoff musings
Published: 12/14/2010 7:04 PM
Last Modified: 12/14/2010 7:04 PM

How would Oklahoma football fans feel about another meaningful postseason game against Boise State? An opportunity for revenge? A for further embarrassment, to be avoided at all cost? (Has nobody forgotten the Jan. 1, 2007 Fiesta Bowl?)

One positive to such a matchup for OU fans: It would be played in Norman, not in Arizona. It’s part of the imagined 16-team playoff bracket set forth in the new book “Death to the BCS: The Definitive Case against the Bowl Championship Series.”

Based on extensive interviews and research, authors Dan Wetzel, Josh Peter and Jeff Passan have mounted a convincing indictment of the current BCS system. Whether or not you agree with them, it’s fun to imagine how things would play out in an alternate 2010 universe using their playoff plan to determine the national title.

They propose a four-round tournament comprised of the 11 FBS conference champs and five at-large teams. For seeding and selection, the book suggests a formula similar to the one used for the NCAA Tournament in basketball.

For arguments sake, let’s take a credible facsimile of the BCS rankings. The rankings at collegeBCS.com, the website run by RPI basketball guru Jerry Palm, were used for this formulation.

All games are played on the field of the higher-seeded team through the semifinals. The championship game is played at a neutral site.

The 11 conference champions, with Palm’s BCS rankings in parentheses, are:

SEC - Auburn (1)
Pac 10 - Oregon (2)
Mountain West - TCU (3)
Big Ten - Wisconsin (5)*
Big 12 - Oklahoma (7)
WAC - Boise State (10)*
ACC - Virginia Tech (13)
Conference USA - Central Florida (25)
Big East - UConn (26)
MAC - Miami, Ohio (34)
Sun Belt - Troy (87)

*Wisconsin tied Ohio State and Michigan State for the Big Ten title. Badgers selected because of the higher BCS ranking. This is also the case for Boise, which tied Nevada and Hawaii for the WAC title.

Using collegeBCS, we select these five at-large teams:

Stanford (4)
Ohio State (6)
Arkansas (8)
Michigan State (9)
LSU (11)

Now, the tournament is seeded 1-through-16 using collegeBCS rankings:

1: Auburn
2: Oregon
3: TCU
4: Stanford
5: Wisconsin
6: Ohio State
7: Oklahoma
8: Arkansas
9: Michigan State
10: Boise State
11: LSU
12: Virginia Tech
13: Central Florida
14: UConn
15: Miami, Ohio
16: Troy

Oklahoma, as the seventh seed, hosts Boise State, the 10th seed. Here’s a complete list of the first-round pairings, arranged as they would appear on a bracket with No. 1 Auburn at the top and No. 2 Oregon at the bottom.

In this example, the Auburn-Troy winner would play the Arkansas-MSU winner in the second round, Wisconsin-VTech would play Stanford-UCF, and so on. The OU-Boise winner would play the Oregon-Miami winner in the next round.

Troy (16) at Auburn (1)
Michigan State (9) at Arkansas (8)
Virginia Tech (12) at Wisconsin (5)
UCF (13) at Stanford (4)
UConn (14) at TCU (3)
LSU (11) at Ohio State (6)
Boise State (10) at Oklahoma (7)
Miami, Ohio (15) at Oregon (2)

Draw your own bracket and predict the winners all the way to the final game. Or use one of the 2010 college football video games to play it out. Who wins?

-- Mike Brown

Written by
Mike Strain
News Editor



Reader Comments 4 Total

Thomas Cothran (2 years ago)
Who else? Boomer Sooner Baby!!!
MJ17 (2 years ago)
Mike, I think there'd be a couple of changes to the bracket if a playoff were actually put in place -- changes very familiar to March Madness fans. I think the seedings would be adjusted to try to keep teams from the same conference from playing until late in the tournament (Ex: 1Aub and 8Ark). Additionally, I think re-matches would be given very similar treatment. Finally, I think the NCAA would cap the number of teams one conference could get into the playoffs -- perhaps two, perhaps three.
jctblue (2 years ago)
Wow, OU upset in the first round by a WAC team. That'd be a shame.
voteindependent (2 years ago)
Get serious. Your scenario only includes one team from the B12. OSU could beat the bottom five without Blackmon. In fact, they did beat Troy. Miami,Ohio... you are joking, right? UConn? They don't even deserve to be in a bowl game. OU will beat them by at least 50 points. The second and third string could probably beat them too. Until you come up with a scenario that includes more teams this will never work. College football needs to start their games two weeks earlier and play every weekend in December with the championship the second weekend in January. What are you smoking?
4 comments displayed


To post comments on tulsaworld.com, you must be an active Tulsa World print or digital subscriber and signed into your account.


OU Sports

Tulsa World Sports Writer Guerin Emig has covered University of Oklahoma football and men's basketball for the Tulsa World since 2004. He lives in Norman, where he keeps the fact that he is a University of Kansas graduate on the down low.

Follow Guerin Emig on Twitter

Tulsa World Sports Writer Eric Bailey covered TU sports before coming over to the OU beat. He came to the Tulsa World in September 2004 after working eight years at the Springfield (Mo.) News-Leader. He attended Haskell Indian Nations University and the University of Kansas, where he was a 1996 Chips Quinn scholar, a national award given to minority journalism students.

Follow Eric Bailey on Twitter



Subscribe to this blog


Archive

 
OU Sports's Blog Archive:

2/2013  1/2013  12/2012  11/2012  10/2012  9/2012  
8/2012  7/2012  6/2012  5/2012  4/2012  3/2012  
2/2012  1/2012  12/2011  11/2011  10/2011  9/2011  
8/2011  7/2011  6/2011  5/2011  4/2011  3/2011  
2/2011  1/2011  12/2010  11/2010  10/2010  9/2010  
8/2010  7/2010  6/2010  5/2010  4/2010  3/2010  
2/2010  1/2010  12/2009  11/2009  10/2009  9/2009  
8/2009  7/2009  6/2009  5/2009  4/2009  3/2009  
2/2009  1/2009  12/2008  11/2008  10/2008  9/2008  
8/2008  7/2008  6/2008  5/2008  4/2008  3/2008  
2/2008  1/2008  12/2007  11/2007  10/2007  9/2007  
8/2007  7/2007  6/2007  5/2007  4/2007  3/2007  
2/2007  1/2007  12/2006  11/2006  10/2006  9/2006  
8/2006  





Home | Contact Us | Search | Subscribe | Customer Service | About | Advertise
Copyright © 2013, World Publishing Co. All rights reserved.