With that said, however, I do think there is something to the fact that there are very few balanced (and good)offenses in the big XII.
The job-keeping comment is excellent as it relates to college and pros, why take a chance when you can pound it; but anymore, neglecting the passing game is doing a disservice to the players when it comes to college, linemen and quarterbacks, alike.
The style of play still reflects the personality of the the area, conservative heartland, passers from east and west.
This fact remains: no conference, major or minor, has more ineffective passing quarterbacks than the Big 12. And yeah, success in the pros does matter. Ask recruiters. Recruiters want the future pros. Service academies want option runners.
This isn't bashing the Big 12, it's simply expressing amazement at how few good quarterbacks there are around; you're right, it's better, the Missouri fellow looks very capable.
You don't recruit to throw the ball, you'll be in big trouble fast.
Will Stoops be heard cracking jokes?
I looked at several statistical categories from the past 7 BCS National Champions...which goes back to OU in 2000. For those of you with short memories, these teams are: 2000-OU, 2001-Miami, 2002-Ohio St., 2003-LSU, 2004-USC, 2005-Texas, and 2006-Florida.
Here are the team stats that I looked up for each champion as they ranked nationally: rushing offense (yds per game), passing offense (yds per game), passing efficiency rating, scoring offense (pts per game), rushing defense, passing defense, total defense, and scoring defense.
I'll give you some numbers in a bit...but allow me to tell you up front that the single most important team stat BY FAR was scoring defense! The seven champs had an average rank in this category of 4!
The highest offensive category by average ranking was passing efficiency, at 13.86. Scoring offense was close at 14.3. In 2002, Ohio St. won the NC with a passing eff. ranking of 17, scoring offense ranking of 41 (wow), BUT were ranked #2 in scoring defense.
Here are all the average rankings of the past seven BCS champs by statistical category:
Rushing offense-31.4 (low of #68 by OU in 2000 and a high of #2 by Texas in 2005).
Passing offense-37.7 (low of #92 by Ohio St. in 2002 and a high of #13 by OU and USC in 2004).
Pass efficiency rating-13.86 (low of #24 by Florida in 2006 and a high of #7 by USC in 2004).
Scoring offense-14.3 (low of #41 by Ohio St. in 2002 and high of #1 by Texas in 2005).
Rushing defense-15.6 (low of #40 by Miami in 2001 and high of #1 by USC in 2004).
Passing defense-21.6 (low of #95 by Ohio St. in 2002...which makes this average bigger than it should be, and a high of #2 by Miami in 2001).
Total Defense-9.14 (low of #23 by Ohio St. in 2002 and high of #1 by LSU in 2003).
Scoring defense-4 (low of #8 by Texas in 2005 and high of #1 by Miami in 2001 and LSU in 2003.
Now that everyone is sleeping, let me summarize. The picker is correct in passing efficiency being very important, as it is the highest average ranking among the champions. Overall, passing is more important OFFENSIVELY, as the rushing average was only 31.4. But, I'll contend as long as anyone will listen that DEFENSE WINS CHAMPIONSHIPS. Period. Not one single champion since 2000 has had a scoring defense ranking outside the top 10 nationally. Four of them were in the top 4, and two led the nation. Total defense (yds per game) is a clear second.
It ain't sexy...but if you want to have a chance at the title, you better haver a solid defense first. I'd say a QB that has a hig passer rating is 2nd. So Mr. P...I am agreeing with you here...but placing an emphasis on defense.
But on the whole, I agree, it's hard to say what's more important, an unbeatable thrower or an unbeatable defense.
In the pros, it's clearly the thrower.
College, it's harder to reach that passing skill level.
The only thing that can beat a great defense on third and nine with the game on the line is a pass and a catch. The only thing that can stop it is a great defense scheme.
One or the other?
Probably your argument, the defense.
It could be argued that my sample space was small (7 years is not much)...but I feel that it is relevant because of the recent trends to throw the football. If I went all the way back to the 80's and 90's, I'll be that defensive rankings are even more important.
I think the secret to winning it all, in order of importance, includes: 1. a great defense, 2. a high efficiency passer, and 3. some good luck along the way (this brings in turnovers, penalties, bad calls, schedules, etc.)
2. Passer.
3. Running.
We may not miss a game this year!
You know, the pros are so good, it's nearly impossible to sustain a great defense.