READ TODAY'S STORIES AND E-EDITION SUBSCRIBE |  CONTACT US |  SIGN IN
Sports Extra!



SPORTS EXTRA BLOGS

FOR THE RECORD
LOCAL PROS

ALL SPORTS

PHOTOS & VIDEOS

OUTDOORS

FIND A STORY

EMAIL ALERTS

SOCIAL MEDIA

RSS FEEDS

CONTACT US
BUY PHOTOS & PAGES

ADVERTISE ON SPORTS EXTRA


Print story only Print story with comments Email Twitter Facebook Pinterest
Establish the Passing Game
Published: 7/16/2007 4:13 PM
Last Modified: 7/16/2007 4:13 PM

Outside of starbursts provided by Heupel and Young, the Big 12 has been a major football disappointment the last half a dozen or so years.

It is not uncommon for a conference to be top-heavy.

The Big 12 has been bottom-heavy.

Most years, there has been one elite-type team, perhaps a better-than-average runner-up, and the rest stiffs, plugs and dogs.

Why has the Big 12 become the fourth, fifth or sixth best football conference conference in country?

Simple:

A lack of quality passing.

The last great Big 12 passer to make it big in the NFL?

That's an easy one.

Nobody.

Sounds like the Ivy League in that regard, doesn't it.

Colorado quarterback Stewart tried to become an average passer for the Steelers, but still threw like a runner and faded from the scene.

If Young from the Longhorns makes it, it will be as a passer, not a runner (see Michael Vick history).

High school football in this part of the country still resembles something out of the Dusty Ages, run the option, baby (like a service academy, because it's much easier than passing!)

A team with a beautiful passing game is balanced, not gimmicky like Texas Tech; the quarterback is mobile and can scramble, but doesn't run the silly little option, except to surprise.

The Texas A&M coach is in a constant state of trouble because he still uses the option; and can use it next at Idaho Tech.

It's elementary, if the Big 12 wants to be a top three conference again, it needs to establish the pass.




Reader Comments 20 Total

WG (6 years ago)
No argument here over your comments. But the Big 6, 7, 8, and 12 has always been top-heavy. And you're right...passers with ability are flashes in the pan (Grogan is the only Big 8 quarterback that comes to mind that spent any time at all in the pros).
Steven (6 years ago)
Agreed. Although it is a little tough swallowing that the big east is ranked ahead... I agree that even when Nebraska was playing really quality football in the 90's, only a few other schools in the conference were up to the task of trying to keep up. I do believe that conference strength is cyclical.

With that said, however, I do think there is something to the fact that there are very few balanced (and good)offenses in the big XII.

JD (6 years ago)
Good point about how it starts at the high schools. With the exception of Jenks, Union, and a few other "mega" powers, most high schools in this region are still running the tired wishbone or the ancient veer. The Big XII needs their coaches to educate the high school coaches on how to run a modern offense.
TAB (6 years ago)
While I think it's a fair point that the Big 12 lacks NFL caliber quarterbacks, it's also worth pointing out how few QBs are even drafted. The year TU's James Killian was drafted in the last round, wasn't he like the seventh QB taken in the draft? While the Big 12 runs some stale offenses, I would argue that the problem isn't just unique to the Big 12 but most of college football. The Big 10, PAC 10, and Big East (with some exceptions) all have vanilla offenses that keep coaches employed. And many of the best college QBs with "guade" numbers aren't NFL prospects -- Heupel, Jason White, Bobby Reid, Chris Leak, Dorsey at Miami, and so on. Heck, some NFL QBs aren't that hot in college, like Gus Frerotte at TU.
worldpicker (6 years ago)
It really is amazing that in a mega-conference like the Big 12, there hasn't been a quarterback who could hit the broad side of the barn from the inside.


The job-keeping comment is excellent as it relates to college and pros, why take a chance when you can pound it; but anymore, neglecting the passing game is doing a disservice to the players when it comes to college, linemen and quarterbacks, alike.


The style of play still reflects the personality of the the area, conservative heartland, passers from east and west.


worldpicker (6 years ago)
What is the Big 12 at football this season, fourth? Fifth?

fred (6 years ago)
you forgot chris simms, although I dont really like him, he did start last season in the NFL, even if it was for tampa bay.
worldpicker (6 years ago)
You're right, Fred, he did have that one hot stretch. Then parts started flying off him. He's probably as close to a pure passer as the Big 12 has put out. But he's still nowhere near big time.


red (6 years ago)
I dont know if the passing game is all to blame as although the big 12 hasnt put out quality quarterbacks into the nfl, they have put out some pretty good wide recievers, i.e. Roy Williams, Mark Clayton. Anyway, just because a quarterback doesnt go on and be successful in the nfl doesnt mean they were not good quarterbacks in college, i.e. Jason White. Alot of colleges are now going to a run first, pass second type of quarterback now anyway and having alot of success like a West Virginia. Now Im not disagreeing with the fact that overall the Big 12 needs to get better passing, although that also would take better players, but there are other ways to win. And considering that the lower teams in Big 12 cant always get the best players, they might have to use a gimmicky offense to win like Tech.
worldpicker (6 years ago)
Glad you mentioned West Virginia, Red. This team is clearly the trendy pick of the year, everybody loves WV. I don't. Teams don't get great overnight because they're annointed by ESPN.


This fact remains: no conference, major or minor, has more ineffective passing quarterbacks than the Big 12. And yeah, success in the pros does matter. Ask recruiters. Recruiters want the future pros. Service academies want option runners.


red (6 years ago)
Of course as recruiters you want future pros, but predicting that maybe a little hard. Lots alot of kids that are stars in high school are duds in college. And the Big 12 doesnt have the least effective quarterbacks in america with quarterbacks like colt mccoy, chase daniels, sam keller, bobby reid and several others that arent too bad either.
red (6 years ago)
Another interesting point to note, the best football conference in the country as crowned by the media, the SEC, has less teams averaging over 200 yards per game as well as a worse passing effienecy than the Big 12. Apparantly there is one conference that is sticking to the pound it out philosphy.
worldpicker (6 years ago)
The SEC probably has more quarterbacks in the pros than any other conference.


This isn't bashing the Big 12, it's simply expressing amazement at how few good quarterbacks there are around; you're right, it's better, the Missouri fellow looks very capable.


You don't recruit to throw the ball, you'll be in big trouble fast.



worldpicker (6 years ago)
The Big 12 football media day is Monday!


Will Stoops be heard cracking jokes?




Jeremy (6 years ago)
Well Mr. P, you've finally hit a topic that I'll spend a little time on. Anyone who knows me well (at least my blogger side) knows that I am a huge supporter of team defense when it comes to winning championships in football. So...just for all of you guys...I did a little research.

I looked at several statistical categories from the past 7 BCS National Champions...which goes back to OU in 2000. For those of you with short memories, these teams are: 2000-OU, 2001-Miami, 2002-Ohio St., 2003-LSU, 2004-USC, 2005-Texas, and 2006-Florida.

Here are the team stats that I looked up for each champion as they ranked nationally: rushing offense (yds per game), passing offense (yds per game), passing efficiency rating, scoring offense (pts per game), rushing defense, passing defense, total defense, and scoring defense.

I'll give you some numbers in a bit...but allow me to tell you up front that the single most important team stat BY FAR was scoring defense! The seven champs had an average rank in this category of 4!

The highest offensive category by average ranking was passing efficiency, at 13.86. Scoring offense was close at 14.3. In 2002, Ohio St. won the NC with a passing eff. ranking of 17, scoring offense ranking of 41 (wow), BUT were ranked #2 in scoring defense.

Here are all the average rankings of the past seven BCS champs by statistical category:

Rushing offense-31.4 (low of #68 by OU in 2000 and a high of #2 by Texas in 2005).

Passing offense-37.7 (low of #92 by Ohio St. in 2002 and a high of #13 by OU and USC in 2004).

Pass efficiency rating-13.86 (low of #24 by Florida in 2006 and a high of #7 by USC in 2004).

Scoring offense-14.3 (low of #41 by Ohio St. in 2002 and high of #1 by Texas in 2005).

Rushing defense-15.6 (low of #40 by Miami in 2001 and high of #1 by USC in 2004).

Passing defense-21.6 (low of #95 by Ohio St. in 2002...which makes this average bigger than it should be, and a high of #2 by Miami in 2001).

Total Defense-9.14 (low of #23 by Ohio St. in 2002 and high of #1 by LSU in 2003).

Scoring defense-4 (low of #8 by Texas in 2005 and high of #1 by Miami in 2001 and LSU in 2003.

Now that everyone is sleeping, let me summarize. The picker is correct in passing efficiency being very important, as it is the highest average ranking among the champions. Overall, passing is more important OFFENSIVELY, as the rushing average was only 31.4. But, I'll contend as long as anyone will listen that DEFENSE WINS CHAMPIONSHIPS. Period. Not one single champion since 2000 has had a scoring defense ranking outside the top 10 nationally. Four of them were in the top 4, and two led the nation. Total defense (yds per game) is a clear second.

It ain't sexy...but if you want to have a chance at the title, you better haver a solid defense first. I'd say a QB that has a hig passer rating is 2nd. So Mr. P...I am agreeing with you here...but placing an emphasis on defense.

worldpicker (6 years ago)
Jeremy, you're hired!,p>
Impressive stats, all. But as you know, stats come from match-ups; something sorry, like a bad thrower, can make a defense look better.


But on the whole, I agree, it's hard to say what's more important, an unbeatable thrower or an unbeatable defense.


In the pros, it's clearly the thrower.


College, it's harder to reach that passing skill level.


The only thing that can beat a great defense on third and nine with the game on the line is a pass and a catch. The only thing that can stop it is a great defense scheme.


One or the other?


Probably your argument, the defense.


Jeremy (6 years ago)
Well, your post got me interested in the most important aspect of winning in college football. I had the time (it only took an hour), so I did it. I might look at the pros later, just to see how the numbers stack up. But I suspect you are correct about the pro game.

It could be argued that my sample space was small (7 years is not much)...but I feel that it is relevant because of the recent trends to throw the football. If I went all the way back to the 80's and 90's, I'll be that defensive rankings are even more important.

I think the secret to winning it all, in order of importance, includes: 1. a great defense, 2. a high efficiency passer, and 3. some good luck along the way (this brings in turnovers, penalties, bad calls, schedules, etc.)

worldpicker (6 years ago)
1. Defense.


2. Passer.


3. Running.


We may not miss a game this year!


You know, the pros are so good, it's nearly impossible to sustain a great defense.



John (6 years ago)
Actually, the most successful former Big12 QB in the pros may be Josh Fields...in um...baseball.
worldpicker (6 years ago)
John, that supports the no qb point even more, doesn't it; and you might be right.


20 comments displayed


To post comments on tulsaworld.com, you must be an active Tulsa World print or digital subscriber and signed into your account.


Out Pick The Picker

The Picker began entertaining – and infuriating – sports fans in 1993. Each week during football season, he writes about his picks of college and NFL games in his Thursday Sports column. He's never afraid of sharing his opinions about the game and the personalities who play it. Readers have a chance to go against him each season in the Outpick the Picker contest. He welcomes the competition.

Follow The Picker on Twitter


Subscribe to this blog


Archive

Past Articles By The Picker

1/31/2013
     The Picker: Super Bowl merely a distraction from OU woes
 
The Picker's Blog Archive:

2/2013  1/2013  12/2012  11/2012  10/2012  9/2012  
8/2012  7/2012  6/2012  5/2012  4/2012  3/2012  
2/2012  1/2012  12/2011  11/2011  10/2011  9/2011  
8/2011  7/2011  6/2011  5/2011  4/2011  3/2011  
2/2011  1/2011  12/2010  11/2010  10/2010  9/2010  
8/2010  7/2010  6/2010  5/2010  4/2010  3/2010  
2/2010  1/2010  12/2009  11/2009  10/2009  9/2009  
8/2009  7/2009  6/2009  5/2009  4/2009  3/2009  
2/2009  1/2009  12/2008  11/2008  10/2008  9/2008  
8/2008  7/2008  6/2008  5/2008  4/2008  3/2008  
2/2008  1/2008  12/2007  11/2007  10/2007  9/2007  
8/2007  7/2007  6/2007  5/2007  4/2007  3/2007  
2/2007  1/2007  12/2006  11/2006  10/2006  9/2006  
8/2006  





Home | Contact Us | Search | Subscribe | Customer Service | About | Advertise
Copyright © 2013, World Publishing Co. All rights reserved.