READ TODAY'S STORIES AND E-EDITION SUBSCRIBE |  CONTACT US |  SIGN IN
Sports Extra!



SPORTS EXTRA BLOGS

FOR THE RECORD
LOCAL PROS

ALL SPORTS

PHOTOS & VIDEOS

OUTDOORS

FIND A STORY

EMAIL ALERTS

SOCIAL MEDIA

RSS FEEDS

CONTACT US
BUY PHOTOS & PAGES

ADVERTISE ON SPORTS EXTRA


Print story only Print story with comments Email Twitter Facebook Pinterest
Minus D
Published: 9/8/2008 5:38 PM
Last Modified: 9/8/2008 5:38 PM

Here we go again.

None of the major in-state football teams can stop anybody.

But it might not be quite as bad as it sounds. Nobody can stop anybody else, either.

Last weekend, 23 major college football teams scored more than 50 points; 46 teams scored more than 40 points.

As you first heard here some while ago, the spread formation has revolutionized college football.

The problem is, quarterbacks and receivers are a whole lot better than cornerbacks. College cornerbacks are usually converted nose guards and ends. High school cornerbacks stand 5-6 and weigh 155, wearing six pairs of socks and four t-shirts. College cornerbacks aren't much bigger. Every time you put on a good college game, a 6-3 receiver is toying with a shrimp at the corner.

So how do you stop a competent spread offense?

People earning three mil a year can't stop the spread, how can we, earning half that, stop the stupid thing?

Blitz and pray, it's the only way.

Of the three state teams, OU has far and away the best chance to stop somebody now and again. But since Mike Stoops left, the cornerbacks have been spun around like tops on a routine basis. This year's secondary appears vulnerable to fast people and reasonably tossed footballs, once again.

At numerous times Saturday, it didn't appear that OSU or TU could stop the Peabody Ducks.

Both have crazy offenses. OSU has two first round NFL catchers. TU's offense is surely the nation's most creative.

The expertise with which spread offenses are being run makes such expressions as "field position" seem old-fashioned.



Reader Comments 40 Total

PW (4 years ago)
Just want to put it out there to Mike....good call on OSU. Thought UH would have put on a better show. Props to you on the OSU call.

What has happened to West Virginia? Is Stewart just over his head?......
MIKE (4 years ago)
Appreciated, PW. Although, I can't say that I am satifisfied with how many yards/points they gave up.

I agree about West Virginia. Many had them as the sleeper for the NC game. It turns out that just because a team rallies behind a coach for one game, it doesn't mean that the coach is deserving of the head spot. Maybe they spent all of their efforts trying to figure out if East Carolina is actually a state.
Village Smithey (4 years ago)
Ah, at last you're (we're) catching on. I, too, have pilloried Venables about the woeful performance of the Oklahoma secondary since the departure of the possibly overrated Mike Stoops and his role on the sidelines in Norman. But, as it turns out, the spread offense makes a mockery of traditional defenses and shines the spotlight on poor tackling. The defenses are spread so very thin that one missed assignment, one missed takle, and the offense is off and running. This doesn't excuse the Sooners for the disgrace of the USC Orange Bowl game; but it can perhaps explain the high point totals allowed to Boise (Boise, fer god's sake???) and West Virginie. However, Venables still leaves much to be desired (even his defensive coaches have commented behind closed doors that he "has no plan").
Chris (4 years ago)
Ya, OSU's offense was great. The defense was not good, but they were in prevent mode throughout the second half, and 16 of those points came off of OSU turnovers.

I see improvement in the future.

I would also be worried about OU's D. I know they beat Cincy nicely, but Cincy didn't really have much of an O coming into this season after losing their QB and receiver.

Better teams can and will be OU and OSU.

TU is going to be a contender for the C-USA crown as ususal. I am guessing 2 more seasons tops for Coach G before he finds an SEC or Pac-10 team to coach.
Chris (4 years ago)
And by "be" I mean beat.

World Picker (4 years ago)
PW: What happened at West Virginia is the quarterback saw what happens to running quarterbacks in the pros. You get obliterated. So to try to improve his draft position, he quit running and started throwing. Too bad he can't throw. Same with Tebow at Florida. Less running, more wild chunking.

Smithey: One of the former OU defenders said in a radio interview, when asked why OU had been flopping in the BCS bowls: Mike Stoops left.

The two things Bob Stoops is the most defensive about: playing lousy on the road, defensive secondary malfunctions.



John (4 years ago)
Right, Im sure Venables has no plan going into each game... That ranks in the top 3 of all the dumb comments ever made on this deal and that is saying something. If one the OU defensive assts ever said that, they would not be on the staff so I am doubting accuracy of village whatever...
PW (4 years ago)
Picker,

I thought that might have something to do with it. White is playing COMPLETELY different than last year. I don't necessarily blame him, either. But I do find it odd the head coach isn't doing anything about that.

Add me to the list of people who observe that the OU secondary has not played up to par since M.Stoops left. I won't question the defensive intensity....but if you remember the 2000 season, and the Texas A&M game, well....haven't seen that level of intensity in a LONG time.

So I'll ask an unpopular question. 4 BCS bowl defeats. What would prevent Stoops from making a change? And if he did, who's better?
World Picker (4 years ago)
Stoops would seem to be loyal beyond won-loss results.

The only time he might part with an assistant is when somebody else comes hiring.

MIKE (4 years ago)
Everybody is comparing an OU defense today to one that was dominate in a time when the spread offense didn't even exist. I don't think thats quite fair because quite simply, nobody has figured out how to stop spread offenses yet! That's why the style is so popular right now. Venables just happens to be the defensive coordinator in a bad time of offensive transition around the country. If Venables were the DC in 2001, I doubt there would be many nay-sayers.
BLA (4 years ago)
I agree with the Wicker Picker. College football and the spread offense has turned the game into Arena football with no nets or boards and guys have to run longer distances. As with the Talons, I pray that TU is able to make three defensive stops per game and then make the other team have to kick FG's twice. With that, TU should win handily. Against BYU last year, they made 1 stop and it was on the final drive. The difference for TU this year is they are stronger against the run and are actually better at covering the WR's down the field...the struggle is when you cover the RBs, TEs and WRs, you leave the QB on his own and then they run for 10-12 yds a pop...That is where Charles Clay and speed DE's come in as they can put on a pass rush but also drop and shadow the QB. That is how you beat the spread. Point in hand, that is exactly how East Carolina beat WVa this past weekend. Shadow White knowing he is not going to throw the football and doesn't have an explosive runner to pitch to.
World Picker (4 years ago)
The spread is so potent that it has even passed people like Spurrier by.

One way to beat it is to go for two.

Another way might be in making the recruitment of actual corners a key.

D linemen, who cares, the ball is gone in .015 seconds. Linebackers and corners, perhaps that's the ticket.

23 teams scoring over 50 last weekend is a joke.


cyco myko (4 years ago)
Hey Licker,
Real insightful comment that the secondary is vulnerable to speed and well-thrown passes. Aren't they all vulnerable to this?
And you continue to harp on the secondary since M. Stoops left, but I wonder what the secondary is up to down at U. of Arizona where he's at now. Oh yeah, they suck.
Chris (4 years ago)
Cyco,

Sorry to burst you bubble, but good ol' M. Stoops is a good coach, not a good recruiter.

His talent he worked with at OU was far superior because his brother recruited great players and he made them great. Now, Bob recruits great players and Brent V. makes them decent.

Do you understand that?
cyco myko (4 years ago)
Okay Chris, if he's such a good coach and capable of making players better, why hasn't he done it in Arizona? He should be able to take what he has and make them excel, (if in fact he was the one doing it at OU), but he hasn't. I wouldn't even say he's that good of a head coach,judging by his win-loss at U of A.
And what does that mean 'he takes GREAT players and makes them GREAT'? This sounds like he had superior talent and did little more than ride them to a head coaching position. How did he make them great if they were already great? That doesn't make any sense. Do you understand that?
Village Smithey (4 years ago)
The best solution, thus far, for the spread is a deadly, disrupting blitz by big, intimidating def ends.
Village Smithey (4 years ago)
And sorry to destroy your childlike faith in Venables John. Here's more bad news...there's no tooth fairy, no Santa, and the jury's still out on whether there's a defensive coordinator in Norman.
Chris (4 years ago)
Cyco,

It makes sense to those who don't look through life with crimson-colored glasses.

Let me clarify it for you: He took great high school players, and made them even better. There is no argument there, because after he left, those great players came in and the secondary dropped off.

How else can you explain it? Your telling me OU isn't recruiting as good of players now? I think not.

What exactly are you backing up your argument with? Just an opinion? I mean, that is fine. I am just curious. Look at the stats.
Chris (4 years ago)
And another thing,

U of Arizona is not exactly a hotbed of a football state or program.

It would take an amazing recruiter to get kids to go to Arizona. His recruiting ability has no bearing on how good of a defensive coach he was at OU.
cyco myko (4 years ago)
What stats am I looking at? The win-loss stats. So OU has given up more passing yards. If you use the Licker's own logic, that can be attested to the fact that people are passing more than ever. So wouldn't passing yards allowed go up because of this?
Just saying that Mike Stoops is given way too much credit for anything OU ever did. OU is still winning the majority of their games without him. It's not like they were undefeated every year with him. You might also notice that the secondary coach at OU is the same one that has been there the entire time that B. Stoops has been. And if Brent V. is making all these great players 'decent', how come so many of them keep getting drafted?
And what makes you think you have to be a miracle worker to get players to go to U of A? This is a good school, it's in the Pac-10 and they sure don't seem to have a problem getting basketball players to go there. Seeing how they won a championship not too long ago. True, Tucson isn't exactly Los Angeles or New York City, but neither are the majority of college towns across the country. I mean, honestly, there's nothing special about Norman, Oklahoma, but players still go there. If M. Stoops is the defensive genius that people want to make him out to be, players would have no problem going to Arizona to play for him. It's not like Arizona is some wasteland.
MIKE (4 years ago)
Ok Cyko, I was with you until you started asking why it was hard to recruit football players to a basketball school and then asking why any player would choose OU in Norman. First of all, it's extremely hard to recruit football players to Arizona because when kids think of Arizona, they think of basketball, not football. Don't believe me? Go ask the Duke coaches. Second, you're right, there's nothing entirely special about Norman--except for the fact that it has one of the most storied football histories in all of college football (this coming from an OSU fan). There are several reasons a recruit would choose OU over Arizona and none of those reasons have to do with location. It's all about the football program.

With all that being said, I do agree with your basic argument that even if Mike Stoops were to come back to OU right now, he would not have the success that he did 5+ years ago. The spread formation has changed the game in favor of opposing offenses and nobody (not even Little Stoops) has found a way to stop it. Had the roles been reversed and Mike Stoops was at OU now, I think everyone would be praising Venables in the same way.
LaffALot (4 years ago)
So how do you stop a competent spread offense? Recruit Big-time receivers 2 play cornerback, then size/talent meets size/talent. But it won’t matter in the NFL where they still have that “stupid” pass interference call where ball is down @ pt. of contact. The NCAA 15yrd penalty rule makes a lot more sense.

A good run defense, which OU “looks” to have, make it more difficult for those spread formation offenses to run their offenses.

OSU will be 5-0 heading into Missouri, while Mizzo could be “fuming” after a loss @ Nebraska the week before. Should be a REAL offensive ‘shootout!

Outside of Tulane @ home in Nov., I don’t see one team on TU’s schedule that has a “prayer” of a chance of containing & stopping the Big “O”

With Ryan Broyles @ OU, Dez Bryant @ OSU, & Brandon Marion @ TU, has the state of Okla. Ever had this many high quality wide receivers playing @ our D-1 universities?
Chris (4 years ago)
Cyco,

I agree that the spread has hurt the stats of every defense in college football, but how many teams use the spread in the Big 12? OSU and Tech. And OSU just started that about 3 years ago.

Also, exactly how many OU DB's have been drafted in the last 4 years? I am honestly asking the question, since you brought it up. I have no idea.
MIKE (4 years ago)
Um Chris, how about Kansas, K-State, Mizzou, and Baylor?
cyco myko (4 years ago)
Mike Stoops gets a lot of credit since OU has been giving up some yards in the air over the past few years, but Bobby Jack Wright has been the secondary coach all ten years of the Bob Stoops era. Shouldn't he be getting the praise or the blame? I liked Mike Stoops and everything, but it seems like he gets a lot of credit when, ultimately, OU is still winning the majority of their games without him.
And Arizona might be a basketball school, but so is UCLA and they've had a decent squad the last couple of years. Hell, they beat USC. Arizona in the Pac-Ten shouldn't be that hard to recruit for. Have you seen Arizona? It's like a postcard.
As far as players drafted, just off hand: Roy Williams, Derrick Strait, Reggie Smith, and some others that I'll see about.
25 of 40 comments displayed  |  View All


To post comments on tulsaworld.com, you must be an active Tulsa World print or digital subscriber and signed into your account.


Out Pick The Picker

The Picker began entertaining – and infuriating – sports fans in 1993. Each week during football season, he writes about his picks of college and NFL games in his Thursday Sports column. He's never afraid of sharing his opinions about the game and the personalities who play it. Readers have a chance to go against him each season in the Outpick the Picker contest. He welcomes the competition.

Follow The Picker on Twitter


Subscribe to this blog


Archive

Past Articles By The Picker

1/31/2013
     The Picker: Super Bowl merely a distraction from OU woes
 
The Picker's Blog Archive:

2/2013  1/2013  12/2012  11/2012  10/2012  9/2012  
8/2012  7/2012  6/2012  5/2012  4/2012  3/2012  
2/2012  1/2012  12/2011  11/2011  10/2011  9/2011  
8/2011  7/2011  6/2011  5/2011  4/2011  3/2011  
2/2011  1/2011  12/2010  11/2010  10/2010  9/2010  
8/2010  7/2010  6/2010  5/2010  4/2010  3/2010  
2/2010  1/2010  12/2009  11/2009  10/2009  9/2009  
8/2009  7/2009  6/2009  5/2009  4/2009  3/2009  
2/2009  1/2009  12/2008  11/2008  10/2008  9/2008  
8/2008  7/2008  6/2008  5/2008  4/2008  3/2008  
2/2008  1/2008  12/2007  11/2007  10/2007  9/2007  
8/2007  7/2007  6/2007  5/2007  4/2007  3/2007  
2/2007  1/2007  12/2006  11/2006  10/2006  9/2006  
8/2006  





Home | Contact Us | Search | Subscribe | Customer Service | About | Advertise
Copyright © 2013, World Publishing Co. All rights reserved.