Where is Vince Young today?

Where is Chris Leak today?

In case you were out of town, Tim Tebow ran for about six inches versus OU, he beat Alabama and the Sooners with the pass.

You option guys, go Air Foce.

Tebow ran for six inches? Then who was that guy who was gutting the Sooner defense right up the middle in the third and fourth quarter? While Tebow may become a second string fullback in the NFL, the FACT remains that he rushed for 109 yards against Oklahoma.

The picker is getting PWNED on this article.

3 halves?? Hmm...

Question...why do the comments on the blogs go in reverse chronological order while the comments on the articles are the opposite? Just curious.

Plus, you're wrong Picker. Run-first QB's with average arms don't work in the pros because defenses are too fast and can contain them and cover receivers better. They work great in college because defenses are spread thin and are vulnerable in places allowing fast QB's to run wild or allow an average arm QB to complete a pass. Vince Young is a perfect example. Unstoppable in college, containable in the NFL. Your original blog says that pass first QB's are necessary in college, which isn't true.

"And not just any type of quarterback. Run-pass quarterbacks are not worth their stars. Drop back passers are the key to the BCS." The picker is reaching as always: as Mike mentioned, 3 of the last 4 BCS National Champions were led by run-pass QB's. Geez picker, it's one thing for you to attempt to "rile-up" your readers, but it's quite another to be dead wrong, time and time again. Continue reaching.

As an OU fan, my heart sank when I found out their opponent would be Florida because I knew we were in trouble with Tebow. Look, he passed for less yards in the game than most of our opponents in '08, but he killed us with his legs. OU 'fans' that pretend otherwise are stupid or bitter - or both. Bradford will be the better pro, but to pretend run/pass qbs in college are 'yawners' is typical of a lot of OU fans who think OU sets the trend and standard for everyone. Wouldn't trade Bradford for ANYONE, but dont' be morons. We are slowly building years of evidence that not only CAN they win championships but are preferred....

Holy Shnikes, is the Picker even writing this blog anymore?? He has been uncharacteristically wrong for the last couple weeks! And yes, usually his points can be debated. But this isn't even close!

Who cares where Vince Young and Chris Leak are today! Your quote was "key to the BCS." How about Eric Crouch for another?! Michael Vick?? The point is that they dominated in college (you know, the BCS) WITH THEIR FEET! Tebow had nothing to do with that win? That's funny because I remember very pivitol points in the game where he ran for 1st downs on 3rd and long situations! Those are the momentum killers that doomed OU...not the CBs.

Also, good CBs are important but there is NO WAY that they are more important than great D-Linemen. If you can't get to the QB with a 4 man rush, it doesn't matter how great your CBs are, the receivers are eventually going to get open.

This is getting embarrassing for you, Picker. Making points that have nothing to do with the debate (Young and Leak's careers now), stating horribly false statistics to try to back up your point (Tebow running for "six inches" when he ran for over 100 yards)...wow.

Hey, at least you hit 14 of your 15 point spreads. Hold onto that puppy for as long as you can. Haha, you sound like some fifty year old who still wears his Div. 2 High School Championship ring and letterman jacket. Keep living the dream!

Wow Picker, your arguments get more and more ridiculous by the second. First of all, not all national championships are won by QBs...ask OU. Some by RBs, some by defense...some even by special teams.

Second, are we talking about National championships 20 years ago when QBs NEVER even ran the ball? Wow, talk about a skewed statistic. Hey, how about we go back 50 years before the forward pass was even in play while we are at it? How many QBs won those national championships by being pocket passers?

The point is that we are talking about college football today--in recent years. Should I go slower for you? I'm fairly sure everyone has already given you enough examples of running QBs in recent years whom have won BCS games because of their mobility. Just admit you are wrong and we'll all move on and only laugh at you when you aren't around.

With that being said, I'd love to say that you lose but everyone already knows you were never even allowed on the field.

Um...hasn't OU actually won more championships with mobile/running QBs? So, according to picker's logic, OU should immediately go back to the option......I hope he's being moronic on purpose just to play us to make comments, and he's not really as stupid as he's come across on this post.