READ TODAY'S STORIES AND E-EDITION SUBSCRIBE |  CONTACT US |  SIGN IN
Sports Extra!



SPORTS EXTRA BLOGS

FOR THE RECORD
LOCAL PROS

ALL SPORTS

PHOTOS & VIDEOS

OUTDOORS

FIND A STORY

EMAIL ALERTS

SOCIAL MEDIA

RSS FEEDS

CONTACT US
BUY PHOTOS & PAGES

ADVERTISE ON SPORTS EXTRA


Print story only Print story with comments Email Twitter Facebook Pinterest
The Real Top Ten
Published: 10/11/2010 1:54 PM
Last Modified: 10/11/2010 1:54 PM

Forget the nonsense.

Here is the the real thing.

1. Alabama. The best of any on a neutral field.
2. South Carolina. Skilled.
3. Nebraska. Fast, mean.
4. Ohio State. Played nobody, to play hardly anybody.
5. OU. Played great schedule.
6. Boise State. Poster team for being disrespected
7. Oregon. About like Mich, good offense, rotten defense, weak, weak conference.
8. LSU. Loopy Les lucky, also, the defense can play big time.
9. TCU. Gritty.
10. Auburn. Has tank at quarterback.

Bonus pick previews: Texas haters rejoince, Nebraska figures to punish the Longhorns.

As we gave you the South Carolina upset two weeks ago, here are two more similar previews: Oregon State over Oregon. Iowa over Ohio State.




Reader Comments 35 Total

BLA (2 years ago)
Boise St needs to be higher. They've got BCS speed on the edges, a BCS caliber QB, and the BEST coach in the country.
The Picker (2 years ago)
Bla, wouldn't OU/Boise be around a toss-up?
BobSmith007 (2 years ago)
I assume this is more like a mock poll ... as opposed to the 10 "best" teams in order. For weeks you've been preaching about the Ohio State University's lack of depth ... just recently saying OU would "thump" them ... and Nebraska to a lesser degree???
BLA (2 years ago)
I think Boise St would thump OU in a big bad way. Mobile QB and WR's who can flat out fly against a weak OU secondary. Boise St also showed that their pass rush and line are decent against a VaTech rushing attack that is normally good (hard to get a true feel for VaTech this year). Boise St's DBs are pretty good as well and really the only thing that hurt them against VaTech was Tyrod Taylor and his amazing athleticism. We all know Landry Jones is not that athletic.
BLA (2 years ago)
And Pick...am I going to get extra credit for picking the Nebraska/K-State game? I seem to recall you wanting to take extra credit for calling the OU/Texas game to within a point a couple of weeks ago.
WCO (2 years ago)
Pick: If OU beats NU in the title game, will we not get in the BCS championship based on strength of schedule? Thanks

The Picker (2 years ago)
WCO, yes, great point, OU should absolutely get in the title game if it wins the Big 12.

Given the strength of schedule, there's no debate by anybody with a brain. OU's schedule has been so tough, it will push Nebraska over the top if the Cornhuskers win. Don't forget, that Nebraska quarterback throws like a runner.

All the radio and TV silly characters who constantly complain about OU's schedule being too tough need to wake up. In this system, the schedule is the key to getting where you want to be, the final game, or where you don't want to be, the Cotton Bowl, etc.
Loki (2 years ago)
Nebraska is mad about last year. Texas is mad about this year.

Maybe Martinez really runs a 2.8 forty. Or, maybe KSU's entire defense being blocked into the consession stand on 60% of the plays had something to do with it.

Why does it seem like such a long time since the Huskers made anybody this wary?

Horns will make him use his arm. Like Pick said, it's not clear he has one. We'll find out if Texas has surrendered.
Kenmore (2 years ago)
I dunno 'bout Nebraska. I thought Kansas State simply looked terrible more than Nebraska looked great.

And going against the popular choice, I think Texas will give Nebraska all they can handle when they meet. For some reason, Texas seems to do pretty well against them and they've had a week extra to prepare.

For teams like Boise State, if your conference gets no respect, then by golly schedule a decent Big 10 or Big 12 or SEC team for cryin' out loud.

Dark Horse: Auburn. That QB is Hooooge, if they go undefeated it could be "hello BCS"...
Glenn616 (2 years ago)
Mr. Picker,
Oregon is a better team than Michigan. Michigan just got housed at The Big House by Sparty. In addition, Oregon's QB is a better passer than the Michigan QB. LaMichael James is much better than any of the running backs that Michigan has. With the number of times Rich Rodriguez runs his QBs, I'd be surprised if Denard Robinson made it through the rest of the season unscathed.
Don's World (2 years ago)
Doesn't really matter if Texas makes Martinez use his arm, Nebraska's defense will make Gilbert use his...I envision greasy spot. Bla, your dislike for OU is showing, but I can't say anything to you as you were so close on Nebraska K State score. Nebraska is good folks, accept it.
BLA (2 years ago)
Don's World, other than the Florida State win, what has been impressive about OU? The secondary is simply not good and they have shown a knack to struggle against dual threat QBs.

Kenmore, I am sure that Boise St. will take any game it can get against the so-called "big boys" but none of them will schedule them at home, on the road, or even a neutral field, and after what they did to Va Tech, I suspect it will become even more difficult next year.

Hypothetically speaking...and I'm not proposing that this will actually happen, but looking ahead to 2011...if TU went undefeated with non-conference games against OU, Boise St, and OSU...would that finally be enough to get a non-AQ into the BCS championship game? Everyone complains about non-AQs strength of schedule because their conference is not as strong...but I'd like to see another FBS team with a non-conference slate like that and is that what a non-AQ has to do to reach the big game. 3 of Boise St.'s non-conference games this year were all against teams from so-called "better conferences" (although I would argue that the ACC and Mountain West, while better teams top to bottom, not one in either of those conferences is as good as Boise St.), yet they still haven't done enough. The Picker keeps heaping praise on OU for their non-conference scheduling this year, yet Utah State is not great, Cincinnati is terrible this year, Florida State is not who we thought they were, and Air Force is a nice team, but not even in the same level of Utah and TCU from the Mountain West.

Can anyone tell me the last time Boise St. lost a game?
MexiMike (2 years ago)
BLA, Boise State's last loss was their bowl game in the 2008 season to TCU.
love 918 (2 years ago)
BLA...non-conference scheduling is a worthless talking point. If you play in a tough conference with a champ game (SEC or Big12), then there is no need to schedule a tough non-conference slate.

If you play in a high school conference like the WAC or CUSA, then no amount of non-conference scheduling should help you get to the national champ or a BCS game. I wish I had a vote in the polls, Boise State would be ranked somewhere around 27th.
Don's World (2 years ago)
Now see Bla, ya gone and done it. You spent all credibility you had recently garnered for Nebraska K-State pick. In what Bizzaro world do you live? Where teams smack other teams around and you say they are terrible. Yea Florida State isn't who we thought they are, they are much, much better, as is Air Force, as is Nati, as is Utah State, two teams in line with winning their conference, one who has yet to play a conference game, but already looking much better and a punch and judy team to open season. As I said your dislike for OU is showing. I know you are tweaking OU fan's nose, but if you really believe what you are saying, please know you are wrong. What is impressive about OU this year? Total control of every single ball game they have played, not one single one I was worried about. You do know it was the other teams that were down by two scores entering last 4 minutes of each game right? That worries Sooner fan, they view it as holding on for a win, when it is really the other team desperately trying to come back, so you may scare some of them Bla, but not I. Boise? Last time they lost? When was last time they played anyone? TCU last years Bowl game, which in the end tells us nothing about either team, they should both have been thrown out to play the big boys in other BCS games, they were done no favors playing each other. Boise is more then likely going to come out on top of first BCS poll, right where they should be...NOW. We all know what happens next, unless the Big boys start losing, they will slowly be jumped. I am impressed by what Boise gets done and where they get it done at. Fact is Bla, what have THEY done to impress you? Va Tech? Puhleese. Oregon State? Riiiight. If being honest, TCU is better this year then Boise. Alabama, South Carolina (when not self imploding)and Nebraska remain the best three teams I have seen this year, all three are fast and mean and arrive at the ball with some bad intent. You and pick, and most football fans are guilty of the same thing, unless you win every single game you suck as team. I have heard it from losers of the Super Bowl, they don't come out feeling like second best football team in the land they come out feeling like they are the worst. You all are little girls singin' "what have you done for me lately?" You go from being "Big game Bob" to "Medium game Bob" because you lost to 3 great football teams, one being recognized as one of the best teams in history? Barry said it best, you gotta feed the monster. Oh and by the way since you are making claims that no one can prove this second, I will make my own, OU would kick living stuff out of BSU, as would any of the teams in the top 10.
Glenn616 (2 years ago)
BLA, Florida State's a good team, I'd say. Excluding the loss to OU, Florida State has outscored its opponents 203-47 (average of 40.6-9.4 points per game), including a 45-17 stomping of the Hurricanes at Miami. Florida State is actually better than we thought. If you include the OU game, FSU is still outscoring its opponents 220-94 (average of 36.6-15.6 points per game).

In regards to Air Force not being on the same level as Utah and TCU:
During the 2009 season Air Force lost to TCU by 3 points and at Utah by 7 points in overtime. If they're not on the same level as Utah and TCU, they're pretty darn close.
Junie S (2 years ago)
Bow wow wow wow wow.
The Picker (2 years ago)
Love, you sound like somebody whose favored team has never gotten too near the top.

Besides playing a major, major role in the BCS system -- remember when OU got to the final game on scheduling micro-points over Auburn and others -- playing good teams makes you better for your conference run. Scheduling difficulty alone is what almost always separates players from spectators.
The Picker (2 years ago)
We need to spend a minute more with scheduling.

It's an interesting topic.

Weak non-conference scheduling is a valuable tool. For lightweights. Look who invented rotten scheduling: Kansas State. So if you're nobody who wants to get up to being average and beyond, weak scheduling is a chicken but brilliant strategy.

But: If you want to compete for a national championship, weak scheduling can and probably will put you in the Cotton Bowl.

Simply put, weak scheduling is an essential element for pretenders.

Kenmore (2 years ago)
Hmm, I would've guessed Nebraska was the forefather of weak scheduling, although one must not rule out Arkansas feeding two stadiums at the price of good quality non-conference opponents.

Anyhoo, unless and/or until there is a playoff system (good luck with that) it would be wise for teams in "weaker" conferences to either;

a) Schedule two good quality non-conference foes each season or...

b) Play a "super conference" champ game with another conference champ at the end of the regular season. Like Mountain West vs. C-USA for example...

The latter could help the winner to get a fair shot at getting into the BCS champ game. Or at least a better bowl game overall.

By the way, when was the last time Arkansas played a regular season, non-conference game in a state that didn't border Arkansas?



Oh yea...back in 2005 'gainst USC...so it's join the Arkie football team and see Little Rock...
Don's World (2 years ago)
Pick exactly the team I always compare Boise to, K-State, same formula for success. I am not going to put it down though as it is a great blue print for schools like those to compete. Hire some good hungry coaches, hit the Juco's hard, then wait for those 2 and 3 star recruits you do get to become juniors and seniors, soon you are playing men against boys. That way every three or four years you are actually pretty darned good. This is not a slam at all on those teams, nor should they be insulted for their intelligence. Oh and pick what would you talking heads do without the BCS?
Coxy24 (2 years ago)
Picker, you prove yet again you're a fraud:

"Alabama (-7) at South Carolina: Yet again the old ball putter at South Carolina has everything but a quarterback.

Alabama is the anti-cheesy-spread team, it mans up and makes you like being run over.

If Ark can hang around, so might what's-his-name the former genius, Spurrier, that's the one.

Bama by 6."

Sounds like you really had the guts to take South Carolina straight up and pick the upset, huh? No. You fail again.

MexiMike (2 years ago)
Pick, you act as if scheduling non-conference games is so easy and predictable. What you fail to acknowledge is that these schedules are made YEARS in advance.

When Oklahoma State scheduled Washington State, they had just played in the Rose Bowl. Who could have known they were going to fall so far so fast?

Do you not think OU would have much rather played this year's BYU team than last year's?

Alabama beat Penn State this year in the non-conference. How good does that win really look now?

The point is that there is no way anyone can know how tough a team is going to be 4+ years down the road. Also, going forward, with the Big 12 schedule changing from 8 conference games to 9, there is no way a coach is going to take a chance and schedule yet another tough opponent when he only gets three OOC games.
Cin-Bo (2 years ago)
Picker - agree with you this time, but what about Utah? It would be an interesting game between Utah/TCU or Utah/Auburn... We'll get to see at least one of those. Maybe Utah would be 11. after the list of top 10, followed by OSU and Missouri. Missouri could loose this weekend and that would move Arkansas up. OSU should beat TTech. Doesn't really matter in the long run, go Sooners!
AwayFromHomeTulsan (2 years ago)
1. Alabama. Still the best, despite the "L".
2. South Carolina. Beats the best 3 out of 10.
3. Nebraska. Fast. Mean.
4. Ohio State. Big. Slow. Solid D.
5. Oregon. May be better.
6. Iowa. See Ohio State. Good, despite the "L".
7. Boise State. Weak SOS but still beats TCU.
8. TCU. Great mid-Major.
9. Auburn. Tougher than LSU.
10.Oklahoma. Just barely. Thanks FSU.
25 of 35 comments displayed  |  View All


To post comments on tulsaworld.com, you must be an active Tulsa World print or digital subscriber and signed into your account.


Out Pick The Picker

The Picker began entertaining – and infuriating – sports fans in 1993. Each week during football season, he writes about his picks of college and NFL games in his Thursday Sports column. He's never afraid of sharing his opinions about the game and the personalities who play it. Readers have a chance to go against him each season in the Outpick the Picker contest. He welcomes the competition.

Follow The Picker on Twitter


Subscribe to this blog


Archive

Past Articles By The Picker

1/31/2013
     The Picker: Super Bowl merely a distraction from OU woes
 
The Picker's Blog Archive:

2/2013  1/2013  12/2012  11/2012  10/2012  9/2012  
8/2012  7/2012  6/2012  5/2012  4/2012  3/2012  
2/2012  1/2012  12/2011  11/2011  10/2011  9/2011  
8/2011  7/2011  6/2011  5/2011  4/2011  3/2011  
2/2011  1/2011  12/2010  11/2010  10/2010  9/2010  
8/2010  7/2010  6/2010  5/2010  4/2010  3/2010  
2/2010  1/2010  12/2009  11/2009  10/2009  9/2009  
8/2009  7/2009  6/2009  5/2009  4/2009  3/2009  
2/2009  1/2009  12/2008  11/2008  10/2008  9/2008  
8/2008  7/2008  6/2008  5/2008  4/2008  3/2008  
2/2008  1/2008  12/2007  11/2007  10/2007  9/2007  
8/2007  7/2007  6/2007  5/2007  4/2007  3/2007  
2/2007  1/2007  12/2006  11/2006  10/2006  9/2006  
8/2006  





Home | Contact Us | Search | Subscribe | Customer Service | About | Advertise
Copyright © 2013, World Publishing Co. All rights reserved.