Two issues: the TU series and the lack of an indoor facility
Published: 9/9/2010 1:49 PM
Last Modified: 9/9/2010 1:49 PM
Next week in Stillwater, the University of Tulsa and Oklahoma State are matched in a football game for the first time since 2004. The teams meet again next year at TU’s Chapman Stadium and in 2012 at Boone Pickens Stadium
An e-mail correspondent asks these questions today:
“I need your opinion on something. Am I being paranoid by hearing that
OSU should play TU every year but I do not hear that Arkansas and OU should play TU as much? Also, do you think that by not having an indoor facility . . . it has hurt OSU's recruiting?”
My responses:
Re: The TU series: OSU needs TU as an opponent more than OU or Arkansas. Since 1960, OSU's greatest home attendance average has been for the Bedlam series (obviously). OSU's second-most attended home series has been the TU series – ahead of games against Texas, Nebraska, Colorado, Kansas, etc. TU games result in ticket sales and healthy attendance. Plus, an occasional OSU appearance at TU makes sense. At worst, half of the crowd would be OSU fans.
Re: Indoor facility: In seven years of covering OSU football, I've never had one recruit mention the lack of an indoor facility. Mike Gundy wants it and should have it, and if OSU builds a state-of-the-art indoor facility, it could certainly enhance recruiting. But I don't think the lack of a facility has been detrimental in recruiting. OSU's 2011 commitment list is rated among the best in the nation, and it has been put together in spite of an indoor facility.
-- Bill Haisten

Written by
Bill Haisten
Sports Writer