READ TODAY'S STORIES AND E-EDITION SUBSCRIBE |  CONTACT US |  SIGN IN
Sports Extra!



SPORTS EXTRA BLOGS

FOR THE RECORD
LOCAL PROS

ALL SPORTS

PHOTOS & VIDEOS

OUTDOORS

FIND A STORY

EMAIL ALERTS

SOCIAL MEDIA

RSS FEEDS

CONTACT US
BUY PHOTOS & PAGES

ADVERTISE ON SPORTS EXTRA


Print story only Print story with comments Email Twitter Facebook Pinterest
Winners and Losers
Published: 6/15/2010 2:25 PM
Last Modified: 6/15/2010 3:18 PM

From the Big 12 Insanity:

Winners:

Texas. Sure to be the most hated team in America after scaring Nebraska to the North Pole, and after teasing then dumping the Hang Ten Conference, Texas has surpassed Notre Dame as the most important force in college athletics. Beat OU, it's in the national title game.

OU. See above. Beat Texas, it's a great year. But of late that has been a dream.

The fans, and the rest of the Big 12. Everybody gets to get OU and Texas at home on a regularly scheduled basis.

Losers:

Nebraska and Dr. Tom. The money will be about the same now. And instead of fiddling with the Big 12 North, Nerbaska can forget recruiting south of Omaha and get to know Michigan and Ohio State and JoePa up close and personally.

The Hang Ten Conference. True, this league picked up a football patsie and a good ski trip in Colorado. But after failing to be bailed out -- Big 12 TV ratings are tons better than Pac 10 -- the coasters can get back to surfing.

ESPN, and the rest of the electronic media. Never in sports history has a pseudo-journalistic group been as wrong about so much as ESPN was on the Big 12 comedy revue. Anchors, reporters, insiders, and "sources" were wrong to the extent that when ESPN speaks, viewers and listeners laugh and believe the opposite side. When ESPN sites a "source," substitute "blockhead." Local radio and TV hacks followed right along in this trail of incompetence.

At least messes like this serve one useful purpose. Dummies are identified. Again. Anybody who supported the Hang Ten Conference bail-out knows less than nothing about sports.




Reader Comments 10 Total

Orange (3 years ago)
You're on the money with the ESPN stuff...high comedy!
Loki (3 years ago)
Sheesh. I am no OU homer. I understand living in the present tense. I understand Texas-hyperventilation syndrome.

Try considering a time horizon longer than a single recruiting class. It's fashionable and trenchant to bash Stoops.

I would submit the Big 12 Champ for underperforming is Mack Brown (regardless of how much money UT throws at him).

UT has the big pockets, best recruiting classes and is recently described as the unrivaled 800 lb gorilla of the BCS universe.

How about putting your hyperbole next to your concealed weapon and consider the following list of Big 12 Football Championships culled from the "collegefootballpoll" site:

Looks like OU 6 - UT 2 (does that speak to sustained performance?) Should reality ever rear its sports head in these parts?

2000 Oklahoma 8-0
2001 Colorado 7-1
2002 Oklahoma 6-2
2003 Kansas St. 6-2
2004 Oklahoma 8-0
2005 Texas 8-0
2006 Oklahoma 7-1
2007 Oklahoma 6-2
2008 Oklahoma 7-1
2009 Texas 8-0
MexiMike (3 years ago)
"Anybody who supported the Hang Ten Conference bail-out knows less than nothing about sports."

Pick, I actually agreed with everything you said until this statement. Supporting the move to the PAC limited Texas's power: no TV network and a closer gap in the revenue sharing. As it stands now, Texas is even more powerful and the rest of the schools in the conference are even weaker.

On top of that, the other teams that were going to merge with the PAC were projected to make at least $5 million more a year than they are projected to make in the new Big 12 Lite.

Finally, the PAC would have provided the teams a safer, more solid home. If Texas would have left the PAC, the conference would still have survived. If Texas leaves this new Big 12, everyone will be in this same mess once again.
Marathonman (3 years ago)
Ultimately, the biggest losers in all this are football fans of the plains states, who will only have one or two worthwhile games each fall to care about.

For all the interest generated by anything but OU-UT, OU-OSU, UT-A&M, and maybe the occasional TTech game, might as well be playing golf on Saturdays.

The Picker's hyperbolic diatribes will never convince me that a game involving KU, K-State, Mizzou, Iowa State or Baylor is more interesting that USC, UCLA, Oregon, Arizona, or Stanford. He has his head in the B12 sand.
Glenn616 (3 years ago)
What we have seen with these new expansions has been an attempted money grab by the Pacifist Ten and the Little Ten. The hubris of these two conferences has been evident. I'm glad that Texas, etc. were able to put a stop to this, at least for now.

Nebraska has nobody but themselves to blame for its lack of competitiveness in the Big 12 against the likes of Texas and OU, until recently. They had two subpar coaches before they finally got a good one.
Tulsan in Exile (3 years ago)
The biggest loser is the NCAA as a force for integrity in the game. (I know, there isn’t much of that left.) We will soon have only four mega-conferences and Texas, along with enormous TV deals that dwarf those so far announced. Just imagine what would happen if Texas were caught as a repeat offender, and the NCAA tried to impose a death penalty, or even a multi-year ban from post-season? The networks would risk losing millions. You better believe the conferences will soon have the power to overrule the NCAA. NOBODY is going to mess with the TV deals on the horizon.
FIRE GUNDY (3 years ago)
I agree with MexiMike.
MexiMike (3 years ago)
@Glenn: I just don't see how you (especially as an OU fan) can think Texas having total power and control over this conference is a good thing. Nebraska's lack of competitiveness was more than made up for by their realization that they had to get out from under Texas's thumb in order to have any say in their own future.

@Tulsan in Exile: I'm not sure super conferences will ever happen now. I think the conferences got close enough to realize that entities that big would bring Congress sniffing around. If the government would have determined these super conferences were more about money than education, every school within would have lost their tax-exemption status and soon enough, players would have to be paid. That's a whole can of worms nobody wants to open.
tulsandn (3 years ago)
We the fans are the losers....

Increased ticket prices along with even higher concession, more money for parking.... "How can we charge for air, oh yes, a dome, I see a dome in our future...."

Elitist attitudes among the powers that be that now state to the fan base that they did this for them & tradition & we should thank them for their presence in our society....

This was all done for the money, the fans money & now we shall all cheer together loud & proud as our "heroes" run out onto the field & take our minds off the dollars spent to get us there....

Boomer Sooner, Hook'em Horns, YEE_HAW !!!!
Huskerfan (3 years ago)
With Nebraska moving to the Big 10 far too many people seem to claim that it will mean the end of Texas recruiting. My question is, why?

Utah in 2010, 2009 and 2007 had only two Texas recruits less than Nebraska. In 2010 Utah had 7 Texas kids commit, Nebraska had 5. In 2009 Utah had 6 Texas kids commit, Nebraska had 8, and so on.
How is it that a team in a different state and different conference can pull in all these Texas recruits? I'll let you in on a secret...it's because Utah puts emphasis on Texas recruiting and has made head-way with the Texas high school coaches. You know, the exact same thing Bo Pelini & current staff has done.

Nebraska has *ALWAYS* had to recruit nationally and it will not matter what conference they are in, they will always have to do that. If Nebraska puts an emphasis on Texas, then they will pull kids out of Texas. If Nebraska puts an emphasis on Florida, then they will pull kids out of Florida.

Will Nebraska get every kid they want out of Texas? No. But they will get more than enough to remain successful in that state.
Everyone needs to get over these old wives tales and understand that Nebraska can and will recruit whatever states they can, because it's always been that way. 5 National Championships help in recruiting alot more than what conference you are in.
10 comments displayed


To post comments on tulsaworld.com, you must be an active Tulsa World print or digital subscriber and signed into your account.


Out Pick The Picker

The Picker began entertaining – and infuriating – sports fans in 1993. Each week during football season, he writes about his picks of college and NFL games in his Thursday Sports column. He's never afraid of sharing his opinions about the game and the personalities who play it. Readers have a chance to go against him each season in the Outpick the Picker contest. He welcomes the competition.

Follow The Picker on Twitter


Subscribe to this blog


Archive

Past Articles By The Picker

1/31/2013
     The Picker: Super Bowl merely a distraction from OU woes
 
The Picker's Blog Archive:

2/2013  1/2013  12/2012  11/2012  10/2012  9/2012  
8/2012  7/2012  6/2012  5/2012  4/2012  3/2012  
2/2012  1/2012  12/2011  11/2011  10/2011  9/2011  
8/2011  7/2011  6/2011  5/2011  4/2011  3/2011  
2/2011  1/2011  12/2010  11/2010  10/2010  9/2010  
8/2010  7/2010  6/2010  5/2010  4/2010  3/2010  
2/2010  1/2010  12/2009  11/2009  10/2009  9/2009  
8/2009  7/2009  6/2009  5/2009  4/2009  3/2009  
2/2009  1/2009  12/2008  11/2008  10/2008  9/2008  
8/2008  7/2008  6/2008  5/2008  4/2008  3/2008  
2/2008  1/2008  12/2007  11/2007  10/2007  9/2007  
8/2007  7/2007  6/2007  5/2007  4/2007  3/2007  
2/2007  1/2007  12/2006  11/2006  10/2006  9/2006  
8/2006  





Home | Contact Us | Search | Subscribe | Customer Service | About | Advertise
Copyright © 2013, World Publishing Co. All rights reserved.