MAKE US YOUR HOMEPAGE | Tuesday, February 09, 2010 | WIRELESS CONTACT US | SUBSCRIBER SERVICES | SIGN IN SIGN OUT | MY PROFILE PAGE | MY ACCOUNT


Newspaper View Newspaper View      Print this story Print      Email this story Email      Comment Comment      RSS RSS     
Share      Bookmark Bookmark

Investors sue Boeing over 787 reports
 
By ANDREW M. HARRIS Bloomberg News
Published: 11/18/2009  2:23 AM
Last Modified: 11/18/2009  9:54 AM

Boeing Co., whose development of its 787 Dreamliner jet has been delayed more than two years by production difficulties, was sued by investors claiming that company executives made misleading public statements about when the aircraft will be flight ready.

The employee retirement system for the city of Livonia, Mich., filed the complaint Friday in U.S. District Court in Chicago, seeking class-action status on behalf of all investors allegedly misled by statements made between May 4 and June 22.

Also named as defendants were Boeing CEO James McNerney and Scott Carson, who has led the Chicago-based company's commercial airplane division.

"As the date for the maiden flight of the 787 approached, defendants made a series of misleading statements to the market concerning the results of the testing process for the 787 and Boeing's ability to meet the schedule for the first flight and the delivery of the 787," the complaint states.

Boeing initially planned to deliver its first jets to customers in May 2008. That date has been postponed five times, most recently in June, when engineers discovered structural problems where the plane's wings are joined to the fuselage.

Components of the 787 are being manufactured in Tulsa by Wichita-based Spirit AeroSystems Inc. Officials of Spirit say their company's contract work has not caused any of the problems linked to the delays.

In a statement filed Tuesday with the Securities and Exchange Commission, Boeing said a second lawsuit, making similar allegations, was filed against it in federal court in East St. Louis, Ill.

"The company believes the lawsuits are without merit and will vigorously defend them," it said.

The Livonia pension fund accuses the company of making false and misleading statements in violation of U.S. securities laws. It seeks unspecified money damages.


The Tulsa World Business staff contributed to this story.

By ANDREW M. HARRIS Bloomberg News

Newspaper View Newspaper View      Print this story Print      Email this story Email      Comment Comment      RSS RSS     
Share      Bookmark Bookmark

Reader Comments
       Add your comment

3 comments have been made on this story so far. Tell us what you think below!

Report Comment Reporting Comments

If you see a comment that violates our terms and conditions, please help us by clicking the "Report this Comment" link next to a comment. That will alert the web staff to review the comment. Thank you.  -- Web Editor Jason Collington
 
 
Report Comment
FS, Broken Arrow (11/18/2009 11:50:54 AM)
A high school friend who is involved in this project tells me Boeing's reliance on outsourcing and trusting others to come up with production methods is what bit them in the posterior.

The USA has been, for years, the number one manufacturing entity on the planet but in the interests of political correctness and the pursuit of greater profits and executive bonuses, we have lost that title.

Any fool on the plant floor could have accurately called this outcome years ago when the project started (and probably did).
Report Comment
DaveMoore1, North Charleston (11/27/2009 3:58:31 AM)
Unrealistic timelines were given with this from the beginning. A partially complete shell was then used in the roll-out ceremony to suggest a complete and ready to aircraft, when a minimum of 18-24 months of work was known to be required for an operational aircraft.
Delays were then given incrementally to minimize the effect to the stock prices.
Report Comment
DaveMoore1, North Charleston (11/27/2009 4:01:17 AM)
Unrealistic timelines were given with this from the beginning. A partially complete shell was then used in the roll-out ceremony to suggest a complete and ready to go aircraft to generate publicity and sales; a minimum of 18-24 months of work was known to be required for an operational aircraft.
Delays were then given incrementally to minimize the effect to the stock prices.
 

 
Add Your Comment 
In order to post a comment on this article, you must sign in to Tulsaworld.com. If you do not have a site account, you can create an account for free.

 
  
Post Your Comment
 






Tulsa World

Home | About Tulsa World | Advertise With Us | Privacy | Usage Agreement | FAQ and Help | Contact Us | Today's Headlines
Copyright © 2010, World Publishing Co. All rights reserved.




Advanced Search