MAKE US YOUR HOMEPAGE | Tuesday, February 09, 2010 | WIRELESS CONTACT US | SUBSCRIBER SERVICES | SIGN IN SIGN OUT | MY PROFILE PAGE | MY ACCOUNT


Newspaper View Newspaper View      Print this story Print      Email this story Email      Comment Comment      RSS RSS     
Share      Bookmark Bookmark

TV ads: quiet, please
Powerful groups are fighting the sound levels of commercials.

Courtesy
 
By ROBERT EVATT World Staff Writer
Published: 11/29/2009  2:19 AM
Last Modified: 11/29/2009  9:57 AM


Related Story: Comparing the noise levels

People switch on their televisions for a variety of reasons — to keep informed on daily events, to learn something new, and of course to be entertained.

Most don't tune in just to get their eardrums blasted by a manic ad pitchman.

Complaining about volume levels in commercials is nothing new, as viewers have long had to endure product pitches that seem much louder than the programs they surround.

What's new is that some powerful groups are trying to do something about it.

The Commercial Advertisement Loudness Mitigation Act, or CALM Act, is now working its way through Congress after being proposed by Rep. Anna Eshoo (D-Calif.) in the House and introduced in the Senate by Sen. Roger Wicker (R-Miss.).

The act would require the Federal Communications Commission to prohibit commercials from being louder than the programs they accompany, and has been approved by the House Energy and Commerce Committee.

So far the act hasn't come up for full debate in either chamber.

Earlier this month, the Advanced Television Systems Committee, the entity that sets U.S. television standards, formally approved technical guidelines for networks and stations to eliminate wide variations in volume between programs and commercials.

Mark Richer, president of ATSC, told the Tulsa World that the entity has long heard the complaints, though coming up with a solution has taken time.

"We've actually been working on it for a number of years and precedes any activity being done on Capitol Hill."

Though the standards are voluntary and have no mechanism for enforcement, Richer said they do address the issues brought up by the CALM Act. ATSC has not taken an official position on the act.

Richer said stations already are putting the new standards into effect.

"Even before we finished the recommended practices, we've seen broadcasters start to implement the process," he said. "We've already seen quite a big improvement."

However, the problem can be more complex than it seems, said Gerald Weaver, director of engineering at KJRH. Often, his station has limited control over the volume of what they broadcast.

"We endeavor to control the volume levels as much as we can," he said. "In fact, we go to great lengths to do that. But unfortunately, there are certain things we have no control over."

Weaver said the problem often stems from the source of the material, not the broadcaster. KJRH will receive many programs recorded at lower volumes, and then have to pair them with commercials recorded louder.

Sound quality can also contribute to the problem, since more compressed sounds often seem louder than higher-quality sound, even when both are at the same volume.

Even now, HDTV programming with digital sound can be paired with standard-definition commercials with lower-quality stereo sound.

"Going from 5.1 audio to a stereo commercial does make it louder," Weaver said. "DTV has stepped it up to a level to where it's more of an annoyance."

Richer said his organization has tried to set standards that don't stifle creativity for show producers and commercial producers alike.

"The audio levels are set on a number of things, such as artistic choice and what makes a program or commercial effective," he said. "So there's a balance between not losing that and providing uniform levels so the audience doesn't jump out of their seat when commercials come on."

Though Weaver said commercial volume levels can be a problem, he's more supportive of industry-set standards such as ATSC's rather than federal regulation.




video platformvideo managementvideo solutionsfree video player
Robert Evatt 581-8447
robert.evatt@tulsaworld.com
By ROBERT EVATT World Staff Writer

Newspaper View Newspaper View      Print this story Print      Email this story Email      Comment Comment      RSS RSS     
Share      Bookmark Bookmark

Reader Comments
       Add your comment

14 comments have been made on this story so far. Tell us what you think below!

Report Comment Reporting Comments

If you see a comment that violates our terms and conditions, please help us by clicking the "Report this Comment" link next to a comment. That will alert the web staff to review the comment. Thank you.  -- Web Editor Jason Collington
 
 
Report Comment
Bill Hader, Jenks (11/29/2009 7:51:48 AM)
I have been doing something about it for a long time. I refuse to purchase anything from anyone that uses loud or rude pitchmen. I have been using the dvr for some time to bypass the television ads. I rarely watch live programing. The radio will get a quick switch to a different station if a rude ad comes on. And then sometimes I will call and let the business know that they lost my business because of the ad. IE the rude car ad for "J N" toyota. I purchased a new toyota a year ago. But from the other dealer in town that does not use the screaming guy on the radio. I don't know if they missed my dollars. However I know, that the dealer who does not use the pitchman is enjoying my dollars.
Report Comment
Travelin Man, tulsa (11/29/2009 8:25:57 AM)
I most like the radio ad were the disclaimer is read so fast you cannot understand it,I will never by there product,the disclaimer on tv should be the same size as the ad.you cannot read themthey are faded or to small to read.
Report Comment
Travelin Man, tulsa (11/29/2009 8:26:13 AM)
I most like the radio ad were the disclaimer is read so fast you cannot understand it,I will never by there product,the disclaimer on tv should be the same size as the ad.you cannot read them they are faded or to small to read.
Report Comment
JR, (11/29/2009 8:39:20 AM)
Amen!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Report Comment
Smokeybear55, Tulsa (11/29/2009 10:51:25 AM)
Mr. Evatt. I don't exactly know where your head is at, but Gerald Weaver is the chief engineer at KOTV, not KJRH. Seems you can't even get that right, what makes your credibility on anything else?
Report Comment
Clemson, Broken Arrow (11/29/2009 11:05:17 AM)
Gerald Weaver is the director of engineering at KOTV not KJRH get your facts right before you print your story.
Report Comment
owen, Tulsa (11/29/2009 3:57:02 PM)
I am getting extremely fed up with this. It seems that after I read the feds were thinking about doing something, the problem got worse. I have noticed that the problem seems to be much worse when it is a local ad, especially Cox commercials.
Report Comment
tintulsa, Okmulgee (11/29/2009 4:33:14 PM)
This has been a problem for years, and after the digital TV conversion has become epidemic. I love the excuse of sound compression; it all comes down to decibels (basic unit of sound regardless of technology level of broadcast; that could be easily adjustable with the digital broadcast technology now available and made mandatory by the government to all TV stations). I agree with 'Bill Hader's comment of not doing business with anyone with this approach!

The FCC seems to only be interested in how much money they can make off the selling of frequencies (including the recently made available TV VHF frequencies) for government profit which seems to never show up in GAO audits!

Dolby sound and compression is not the problem, it's the decision people at the networks and local stations that make the decision to boost the audio on commercials! I’ll admit I don’t go to the theaters to see a movie anymore because I don’t want to hear a gunshot or explosion at director’s level without having ear protection!
Report Comment
uklynbereg, (11/29/2009 5:03:11 PM)
Commercials are what a mute button is for. The digital transition rendered my VCR useless for recording, but before then I'd record what few shows were worth watching and fast forward through commercials. Instead of trying to come up with clever and creative commercials, advertisers are just getting louder, only to get tuned out.
Report Comment
true2form, Grand Lake (11/29/2009 5:33:49 PM)
Though I don't watch that much television, my finger is always ready to hit the mute button when it goes to a commercial.
Report Comment
spandex, (11/29/2009 6:27:26 PM)
My old tv (Magnavox-maybe)had a built in feature called "auto-volume" which allowed me to never have to deal with the noise issue until I got the new flat screen. Annoying because now the volume is all over the map
Report Comment
KYCane, Crestwood (11/30/2009 7:01:25 AM)
Aside from football, the History and Military Channels, and cartoons like Little Bear for my five-year-old I don't watch live TV anymore. I DV-R any of these or I'll record movies from Turner Movie Classics. Most of the DVDs I watch are military documentaries.
Report Comment
Oldfatdude, Grizzly Hills (11/30/2009 10:08:53 AM)
Advertisers hate DVR and TVO. (non)-consumers like myself love DVR and TVO.

If I were too poor to afford cable and DVR, like most people, I would wear out the mute button.

However, I sometimes wonder what the economy would be like if there were no advertising or if everyone were like me.
Report Comment
Captain BlackBeaver, Bat-Poop Crazy Island (11/30/2009 10:01:43 PM)
Clear-tone ads should be equally as loud...every time I hear that commercial, I think I am going deaf!
 

 
Add Your Comment 
In order to post a comment on this article, you must sign in to Tulsaworld.com. If you do not have a site account, you can create an account for free.

 
  
Post Your Comment
 






Tulsa World

Home | About Tulsa World | Advertise With Us | Privacy | Usage Agreement | FAQ and Help | Contact Us | Today's Headlines
Copyright © 2010, World Publishing Co. All rights reserved.




Advanced Search