MAKE US YOUR HOMEPAGE | Wednesday, February 10, 2010 | WIRELESS CONTACT US | SUBSCRIBER SERVICES | SIGN IN SIGN OUT | MY PROFILE PAGE | MY ACCOUNT

Home > News > Article

Newspaper View Newspaper View      Print this story Print      Email this story Email      Comment Comment      RSS RSS     
Share      Bookmark Bookmark

House backs limits on abortion
 
By MICK HINTON World Capitol Bureau
Published: 4/4/2007  2:00 AM
Last Modified: 4/4/2007  2:00 AM

SB 714 would restrict abortions by state employees in public facilities

OKLAHOMA CITY -- A bill that would limit abortions by cutting off public funding was approved by the House on Tuesday, despite opposition from the state's two leading medical associations.

Lawmakers received letters voicing opposition from the 5,000-strong Okla homa State Medical Association and the Oklahoma Osteopathic Association, which has about 1,400 members.

The House approved Senate Bill 714 by a 73-22 vote. The measure now returns to the Senate for another vote. It is likely that this is the only anti-abortion measure that has a chance of passing this session. Earlier the House passed two abortion-related bills, but they are not expected to get a hearing in the Senate.

SB 714 would prohibit a state employee from performing or assisting an abortion being performed in a public facility if it was not necessary to save the life of the mother.

Rep. John Wright, R-Broken Arrow, said the bill he is sponsoring in the House "is about who pays for abortions as a matter of public policy."

The State Medical Association op poses SB 714 "because the legislation impedes on the physician's ability to practice medicine," Dr. Jack Beller said in a letter to lawmakers.

Dr. Doug Cox, R-Grove, the only physician in the Legislature, debated against the bill, saying it would take away from a doctor the right to make a determination in extreme cases such as when the mother's health was in danger. The only exception allowed would be if the mother would die unless an abortion is performed.

Cox said it is not possible for a doctor to absolutely conclude that a woman would die if an abortion is not performed.

He also asked, "Why would you force a woman to carry to term a child that will die at birth?"

Tony Lauinger, director of Oklahomans for Life, who led the anti-abortion legislation, said after the floor action that a physician's job "is to cure and heal, not to kill and not to become society's tool for eliminating the unwanted or the imperfect."

Rep. Jeannie McDaniel, D-Tulsa, said it would discriminate against poor people who cannot afford a private physician and end up at public facilities for medical care.

"This is a bill about punishment and sanctions. This is about controlling our health care professionals and judges," she said.

Rep. Pam Peterson, whose husband is a physician, said abortion is "the ultimate child abuse in this country."

Peterson, R-Tulsa, wrote a provision in the bill that would make it harder for a physician to perform an emergency abortion on a minor without a parent or guardian's consent.

Lauinger said the bill also contains language from another measure sponsored by Rep. Charlie Joiner, R-Midwest City, intended to make sure that insurance policies do not pay for abortions.

Two years ago, the Legislature passed a law requiring parental notification before an abortion could be performed on a minor. Last year, the requirement was strengthened to require parental consent.


Mick Hinton (405) 528-2465
mick.hinton@tulsaworld.com

By MICK HINTON World Capitol Bureau

Newspaper View Newspaper View      Print this story Print      Email this story Email      Comment Comment      RSS RSS     
Share      Bookmark Bookmark

Reader Comments
       Add your comment

3 comments have been made on this story so far. Tell us what you think below!

Report Comment Reporting Comments

If you see a comment that violates our terms and conditions, please help us by clicking the "Report this Comment" link next to a comment. That will alert the web staff to review the comment. Thank you.  -- Web Editor Jason Collington
 
 
Report Comment
Maurice Colbert, Tulsa (4/4/2007 11:20:58 AM)
Rep. Pam Peterson, if abortion is "the ultimate child abuse in this country", who should be held responsible and prosecuted for natural abortions?

Report Comment
mike, tulsa (4/5/2007 2:47:11 PM)
no! the ultimate child abuse is forcing women to have babies against their will! Where are all the right wingers at? Aren't you lined up at the adoption centers taking all these children that are put up for adoption?

Report Comment
David , Tulsa (4/6/2007 11:41:12 AM)
Oh come on people. There is a clear difference between intentionally killing someone (abortion) versus someone dying from natural causes ("natural abortion"). To think that we can't (or shouldn't) make that distinction is silly.

Mike, that is not an argument. If you have some logical argument as to why abortion is not killing a human person, bring it. But just because everyone who opposes abortion is not living with ten adopted children does not change the immoral nature of the act of abortion. That's a red herring. Do you think that a reasonable argument against global warming would be to lambast a global warming proponent because he is not single handedly trying to destroy the refinery down the street?

 

 
Add Your Comment 
In order to post a comment on this article, you must sign in to Tulsaworld.com. If you do not have a site account, you can create an account for free.

 
  
Post Your Comment
 


Most Popular Stories
Comments made yesterday 2,108
Total Comments 1,033,981
Register to make reader comments

Most Popular Stories




Tulsa World

Home | About Tulsa World | Advertise With Us | Privacy | Usage Agreement | FAQ and Help | Contact Us | Today's Headlines
Copyright © 2010, World Publishing Co. All rights reserved.




Advanced Search