MAKE US YOUR HOMEPAGE | Friday, November 20, 2009 | WIRELESS CONTACT US | SUBSCRIBER SERVICES | SIGN IN SIGN OUT | MY PROFILE PAGE | MY ACCOUNT

Home > News > Article

Newspaper View Newspaper View      Print this story Print      Email this story Email      Comment Comment      RSS RSS     
Share      Bookmark Bookmark

Tulsa grades well for jobs
 
By DAVID HARPER World Staff Writer
Published: 10/14/2007  2:15 AM
Last Modified: 10/14/2007  2:15 AM

It makes Forbes' top-10 list for "Best Cities for Jobs."

When it comes to the job market, Tulsa is No. 6.

With a bullet.

Forbes.com announced late Friday that Tulsa trails only five other U.S. cities in the business publication's latest ranking of the "Best Cities for Jobs."

Mike Neal, president and CEO of the Tulsa Metro Chamber, said Saturday that his organization is "obviously delighted by this news. However, we're not surprised."

Mayor Kathy Taylor said the designation by Forbes.com demonstrates "the great energy we have here" and shows the city is continuing to move forward.

Tulsa ranked 35th in a similar poll by the publication two years ago.

Forbes ranked the nation's largest 100 metropolitan areas using data compiled by Moody's Economy.com.

While the study does not measure job quality or stability, it takes into account a variety of factors in quantifying job-market strength.

For example, Tulsa ranked seventh in income growth, 10th in cost of living, 18th in job growth and 23rd in low unemployment.

Taylor said the overall ranking shows the strength of the city's expanding "industry clusters" in fields such as aerospace, energy and manufacturing.

Neal was interviewed Saturday while he was on his way to board a flight to San Diego to attend the U.S. Chamber of Commerce's Committee of 100 meeting.

He said these sorts of flattering national rankings are extremely valuable

as the chamber's economic development team continues to show the world that Tulsa is a great place to do business.

He said such studies "provide expert outside validation of our quality of life and the good things that are happening here."

Tulsa was not the only city new to the top 10. Albuquerque, N.M.; Wichita, Kan.; and Oklahoma City also made the list.

Oklahoma City was 10th in the rankings. While there may be a rivalry between the cities, Taylor said Tulsa and Oklahoma City work together to form the twin engines of the state's economic development efforts.

Neal said for "Oklahoma to have two cities in the Top Ten is extraordinary for our state."

Still, there is room for improvement in one of the categories analyzed by Forbes.com. Tulsa ranked 93rd in median household income. Oklahoma City was 90th.

The Tulsa metropolitan area's median household income was $41,649 in 2006, while Oklahoma City's was $42,036, according to a U.S. Census Bureau report released this summer.

Taylor said improving the median income ranking "is the hardest needle to move."

However, the mayor expressed optimism that educational programs such as Tulsa Community College's Tulsa Achieves scholarship initiative will help the city move up in the median household income category over the next decade.

The Tulsa Achieves program essentially makes two-year degrees free for new high school graduates who live in Tulsa County. More than 1,500 students make up the inaugural Achieves class this fall.

Tulsa Technology Center has started a similar program called Pathways.

Neal said that not only creating jobs, but creating good-paying jobs, is the inspiration behind the chamber's Tulsa's Future effort.

In April, the chamber announced the Tulsa's Future initiative contributed 4,422 of the city's 10,500 net jobs created in 2006.

Tulsa's Future was created in 2005 with a five-year goal to create 26,000 jobs in Tulsa. Of those, the goal is for 10,000 to carry minimum salaries of $45,500.

Of the jobs created by Tulsa's Future in 2006, organizers said 1,592 equaled or exceeded the $45,500 salary mark.

Neal said he needed some good news in a week that saw voters turn down a ballot question concerning Arkansas River development.

Proponents claimed that passing the measure would have created close to 10,000 new jobs.


List announced

Forbes.com Top 10 Cities for Jobs

1. Salt Lake City
2. Raleigh, N.C.
3. Phoenix
4. Jacksonville, Fla.
5. Orlando, Fla.
6. Tulsa
7. Austin, Texas
8. Albuquerque, N.M.
9. Wichita, Kan.
10. Oklahoma City


David Harper 581-8359
david.harper@tulsaworld.com

By DAVID HARPER World Staff Writer

Newspaper View Newspaper View      Print this story Print      Email this story Email      Comment Comment      RSS RSS     
Share      Bookmark Bookmark

Reader Comments
       Add your comment

16 comments have been made on this story so far. Tell us what you think below!

Report Comment Reporting Comments

If you see a comment that violates our terms and conditions, please help us by clicking the "Report this Comment" link next to a comment. That will alert the web staff to review the comment. Thank you.  -- Web Editor Jason Collington
 
 
Report Comment
E T, tulsa (10/14/2007 8:15:06 AM)
According to the Our river yes commercials Tulsa has no good jobs unless we did river development.
Report Comment
B Patten, Downtown Tulsa (10/14/2007 8:36:04 AM)
Enough already, give it a rest. Lets move on to something else.
Report Comment
Larry, Tulsa (10/14/2007 8:54:15 AM)
Wow, I thought if we didn't pass the tax, Tulsa would remain in the bitter morass of mediocrity and would never be able to keep or attract a talented workforce. And all along we are ranked in the top 10 for cities for jobs. wow, more proof of the lies the doom and gloom yes'ers.
Report Comment
WilliamTheArtist, Tulsa (10/14/2007 8:58:34 AM)
The article said we ranked 93rd in median househole income. While it is definitely great news we have continued job growth, what people want to do is increase a specific type of job growth, high wage job growth. Education levels is something that ties closely with income. The river yes commercials never said Tulsa didnt have any good jobs, they were wanting to improve the river as one more way of improving Tulsas attractiveness as a city to higher educated workers and the types of things they like to do and have. Every bit counts. (and no the jobs that the river development would have had itself were not high paying ones, its the result of what was built acting as an attractor and making Tulsa more competitive in that way for highly educated young people)
Report Comment
Larry, Tulsa (10/14/2007 9:17:56 AM)
sorry artsie guy, they put the river tax as a sink or swim defining vote for Tulsa. Tulsa has always been swimming and always will. this article, and about 10 others since the vote, puts the lie to all the yes'ers gloom and doom predictions.
Report Comment
David, Tulsa (10/14/2007 9:25:20 AM)
Wow. Let it go already. This is great news no matter what happened to the river. The one thing that I find most interesting is that none of the cities on the list are "major" cities except Phoenix. I would like to know what type of jobs these are that are putting these cities on the list.
Report Comment
Larry, Tulsa (10/14/2007 9:36:10 AM)
sorry, but the gloom and doom yes'ers are not going to get away with it. Tulsa is a great town and always will be.
Report Comment
Pat, Tulsa (10/14/2007 10:55:32 AM)
The Tulsa real estate will explode this winter. Watch and see how bad it is. Why are over 60% of houses for sale vacant? because people left since there were no jobs here.

Why are sales down 24% in the Tulsa School district? Compare Sept 06 to Sept 07 on home sales in Tulsa only.

Let's start posting facts here.

Report Comment
WilliamTheArtist, Tulsa (10/14/2007 2:08:20 PM)
I dont know what city you have been living in over the last 5, 10 years or so, but it apparently wasnt Tulsa #5 Larry. Or apparently you have quickly forgotten how we were losing population, how we lost so many high wage companies, one after another, after another, after another, our tax base dwindled, crime went up, streets got worse, young educated people kept moving away, etc. etc. Sounds like sinking versus swimming to me. Its only been the last few years that Tulsa has started seeing more good news than bad. More companies and people moving in than leaving, home values increasing, wages increasing etc. I remember when we didnt have a public graduate or 4 year university, then we got UCAT and only over the last few years now have OSU Tulsa, OU Tulsa on their own fledgling campuses and starting to grow. We went through some tough tough times. The fear for many is that we still havent got out of the woods, that any economic downturn will take these hard fought and earned gains away. We have seen hopeful times falter before. We have great momentum lets keep it going. No its not doom and gloom like many NO votes were saying either. But there are still areas that need help in our city and Tulsa has some great opportunities to be superb. Fixing the streets, revitalizing downtown, lowering the crime rate, improving education, doing something spectactular along our river. This city can rock, its always had great potential.
Report Comment
Thom, Columbus, Ohio (10/14/2007 3:45:06 PM)
Tulsa Rockz! The Sunday newspaper is full of jobs!
Report Comment
Tulsan, (10/14/2007 4:51:57 PM)
I'm not sure how this ranking was achieved, but I am a home-grown Tulsan and have watched most of my friends move to Oklahoma City or other states for jobs. Why? It isn't that they don't like Tulsa -- they can't find jobs here. Tulsa may or may not be a good place for jobs, but it is not a great place for "professional" jobs.
Report Comment
Maggie, Tulsa (10/14/2007 8:24:58 PM)
Thank God for HB-1804

It is working before going into law.

BYE BYE I.I.

Report Comment
Jeremy Good, Tulsa (10/15/2007 8:08:34 AM)
The same people who said that without a river tax we would never gain high paying jobs ignored the FACT that we are #6 in the nation for already having them. The same people that said river development wouldn't happen without a river tax still say it won't even as plans move forward without it. There was only one group who never believed in Tulsa and one group who were and still are the naysayers, the vote yes to death by taxes crowd. We didn't buy into your lies then and we certainly won't now. I hope all of their friends move out and mine will remain to develop Tulsa into a city free from the nanny state and free from citizens who worship their government as their savior. Tulsa is a thriving city with a big fat drain in its government. Once we fix the good 'ol boy network and rid ourselves of the Stalinist elite then this city will explode in growth. Until then we get to listen to this ilk moan and whine about their socialist heaven being undone by the facts of life.
Report Comment
e, (10/15/2007 9:02:06 AM)
The list is different than I would have expected. I know that I will be biased because I would like to see jobs in my field, and I know none of those cities were on my top jobs lists. It is strange that the economic centers of America (New York, Boston, San Francisco, Chicago) did not make the top ten. I noticed they mentioned that this ranking did not take into account the quality of jobs so maybe that has something to do with it.

---

And I'm waiting to see an article that does not treat the vote last week as such a negative thing for Tulsa. In my view it was a great thing for Tulsa County. The World needs to let it go.

Report Comment
javinehill, skiatook (10/15/2007 9:19:35 AM)
There is a statistically significant correlation between patent issuance and increase in median personal incomes. That is why the research investments by our universities is critical.

The high wage jobs that come from skills scarcity are more difficult to rely on because of industry cyclicality, and the likelihood of being replaced by cheaper (i.e. offshore or immigrant) labor, or technology with a smaller, higher skilled labor component.

The challenges are (1) to make feasible the work skills life long learning concept that has a basis in the Career Readiness Certificate (ACT WorkKeys), and (2) prepare everyone who wants to work to realize that if there is no good match for their work skills and job demand in the local labor market, then there is a need for policies and programs that enable employers, schools and people to make a local geographical commitment.

Report Comment
jk, sperry (10/15/2007 11:37:50 AM)
still upset that my children and grandchildren won't be able to get a great job at a coffee shop or retail clothing store by the river. Guess they will have to settle for getting an education instead. Darn you no voters :)
 

 
Add Your Comment 
In order to post a comment on this article, you must sign in to Tulsaworld.com. If you do not have a site account, you can create an account for free.

 
  
Post Your Comment
 


Most Popular Stories
Comments made yesterday 1,932
Total Comments 895,735
Register to make reader comments

Most Popular Stories




Tulsa World

Home | About Tulsa World | Advertise With Us | Privacy | Usage Agreement | FAQ and Help | Contact Us | Today's Headlines
Copyright © 2009, World Publishing Co. All rights reserved.




Advanced Search