MAKE US YOUR HOMEPAGE | Friday, November 20, 2009 | WIRELESS CONTACT US | SUBSCRIBER SERVICES | SIGN IN SIGN OUT | MY PROFILE PAGE | MY ACCOUNT

Home > News > Article

Print this story Print      Email this story Email      Comment Comment      RSS RSS     
Share      Bookmark Bookmark

Uses for $700 billion bailout money might include executive bonuses
 
By The Associated Press
Published: 10/27/2008  8:54 AM
Last Modified: 10/27/2008  8:54 AM

WASHINGTON -- First, the $700 billion rescue for the economy was about buying devalued mortgage-backed securities from tottering banks to unclog frozen credit markets.

Then it was about using $250 billion of it to buy stakes in banks. The idea was that banks would use the money to start making loans again.

But reports surfaced that bankers might instead use the money to buy other banks, pay dividends, give employees a raise and executives a bonus, or just sit on it. Insurance companies now want a piece; maybe automakers, too, even though Congress has approved $25 billion in low-interest loans for them.

Three weeks after becoming law, and with the first dollar of the $700 billion yet to go out, officials are just beginning to talk about helping a few strapped homeowners keep the foreclosure wolf from the door.

As the crisis worsens, the government's reaction keeps changing. Lawmakers in both parties are starting to gripe that the bailout is turning out to be far different from what the Bush administration sold to Congress.

In buying equity stakes in banks, the Treasury has "deviated significantly from its original course," says Alabama Sen. Richard Shelby, the top Republican on the Senate Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Committee. "We need to examine closely the reason for this change," said Shelby, who opposed the bailout.

The centerpiece of the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act is the "troubled asset relief program," or TARP for short. Critics note that tarps are used to cover things up. The money was to be devoted to buying

"toxic" mortgage-backed securities whose value has fallen in lockstep with home prices.

But once European governments said they were going into the banking business, Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson followed suit and diverted $250 billion to buy stock in healthy banks to spur lending.

Bank executives hinted they might instead use it for acquisitions. Sen. Christopher Dodd, chairman of the Senate banking committee, said this development was "beyond troubling."

Sure enough, a day after Dodd, D-Conn., made the comment, the government confirmed that PNC Financial Services Group Inc. was approved to receive $7.7 billion in return for company stock. At the same time, PNC said it was acquiring National City Corp. for $5.58 billion.

"Although there will be some consolidation, that's not the driver behind this program," Paulson recently told PBS talk show host Charlie Rose. "The driver is to have our healthy banks be well-capitalized so that they can play the role they need to play for our country right now."

Other planned uses of the bailout money have lawmakers protesting, although it is only fair to note there is nothing in the law that they just wrote to prevent those uses.

Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y. questioned allowing banks that accept bailout bucks to continue paying dividends on their common stock.

"There are far better uses of taxpayer dollars than continuing dividend payments to shareholders," he said.

Schumer, whose constituents include Wall Street bankers, said he also fears that they might stuff the money "under the proverbial mattress" rather than make loans.

Neel Kashkari, head of the Treasury's financial stability program, told Dodd's committee this past week that there are few strings attached to the capital-infusion program because too many rules would discourage financial institutions from participating.

As the bank plan has become a priority, the effort to buy troubled assets has receded from the headlines. Potential conflicts of interest pose all kinds of problems in finding qualified companies to manage that program.

"Firms with the relevant financial expertise may also hold assets that become eligible for sale into the TARP or represent clients who hold troubled assets," Kashkari said.

The challenge was made plain when the Treasury hired the Bank of New York Mellon Corp. as "custodian" of the troubled assets purchase program. The bank will conduct "reverse auctions" to buy the toxic securities on behalf of the Treasury. The lower the price they set, the better chance sellers have of getting rid of the devalued securities.

On the same day it hired Mellon, the Treasury also picked the company to receive a $3 billion investment as part of the capital-infusion program. The same bank hired to help manage part of the economic rescue plan became a beneficiary of it.

With the Nov. 4 election nearing, lawmakers decided it was important to remind the government officials running the bailout program about parts of the law aimed at helping distressed homeowners by offering federal guarantees to mortgages renegotiated down to lower monthly payments.

"The key to our nation's economic recovery is the recovery of the housing market," Dodd said. "And the key to recovery of the housing market is reducing foreclosures."

Sheila Bair, who heads the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., responded that her agency is working "closely and creatively" with Treasury officials to "realize the potential benefits of this authority."

By The Associated Press

Print this story Print      Email this story Email      Comment Comment      RSS RSS     
Share      Bookmark Bookmark

Reader Comments
       Add your comment

14 comments have been made on this story so far. Tell us what you think below!

Report Comment Reporting Comments

If you see a comment that violates our terms and conditions, please help us by clicking the "Report this Comment" link next to a comment. That will alert the web staff to review the comment. Thank you.  -- Web Editor Jason Collington
 
 
Report Comment
WeissGuy, Tulsa (10/27/2008 9:18:24 AM)
"But reports surfaced that bankers might instead use the money to buy other banks, pay dividends, give employees a raise and executives a bonus, or just sit on it. Insurance companies now want a piece; maybe automakers, too, even though Congress has approved $25 billion in low-interest loans for them. "
For a few weeks I was worried that bank executives might have to cut down on cavier consumption. But it's so good to see the new "Welfare for the Wealthy" program won't let them go without.
Report Comment
hardball, (10/27/2008 9:19:37 AM)
NEVER trust Wall Street or politicians. The banking industry/lobbiests created this mess by buying politicians with millions of $$$ in campaign funding for the past 8 years. Back in 2002 there were a reported 39 lobbiests for every politician. It's worse now. Everytime a politician is defeated in an election he/she (or their mate) becomes a lobbiest. The only way to resolve the situation is to destroy their system by voting out all incumbents election after election untill DC is purged of lawyers/politicians.
Sadly bernake/the fed is flapping it's face again about lowering interest rates. Absolutely the wrong thing to do. Rachet up interest rates at banks and people will pull their money out of the wall street scam and then banks will have more money to loan to responsible borrowers, not dead-beats,,, after the banks and corporate book-cooking methods have been corrected! Also bailing out corporations is WRONG. If they can't get us to pay for their corporate greed they will have to re-patriate all the billions hidden in off-shore tax havens to stay in business. Even fat-cats at the top have to have a company to hide in.

Dodd is another worthless life-time bought-out politician by the banking industry. Why doesn't this BS allowing bonuses for the greedy-guts that caused the problem not astound or amaze me?
Report Comment
my view, America (10/27/2008 9:44:02 AM)
It better not go for bonuses or raises. It should be used to help keep the stockholders as hold as possible. And in the end it should be paid back.
Report Comment
Bob 1, BA (10/27/2008 9:54:55 AM)
Does any of this bail out surprise anybody? Government, greedy executives and wall street is like the fox guarding the hen house. What a crock.......................
Report Comment
C.R. Delough, Tulsa (10/27/2008 9:58:09 AM)
Color me disgusted, but I'm still taking advantage of the low prices in the market today. Karma (and the public) will remember.
Report Comment
Dr. Strangelove, Tulsa (10/27/2008 10:11:38 AM)
Sounds like one more huge Wall Street handout before a new administration is sworn in. I found it unusual that Kashkari has basically avoided interviews. Now I know why.

The EESA sounds like another disaster in the making. I was in favor of it because I thought we had a real plan. Instead, it has yet to be implemented, and once again the people who should benefit most from the Act will not likely see any of the $$$.

In essence, this was really an expensive PR stunt perpetrated to energize the markets, which didn't happen. Now the cash is up for grabs with no real strings attached. Unreal.
Report Comment
hardball, (10/27/2008 10:22:24 AM)
It's only a matter of time before the malignancy in Washington DC anounce that "Operation Bail-out" was a success,,,,,,, but the patient (America) died!
Report Comment
Scott Smith, Tulsa (10/27/2008 10:33:39 AM)
Who'da thunk, a bait and switch by the politicians and wall street bankers? Checkout bailoutsleuth dot com for an in depth and ongoing investigation into where the funds are going.
Report Comment
EB, Tulsa (10/27/2008 11:05:56 AM)
What a joke!
Report Comment
Not a blind sheep, tulsa (10/27/2008 12:03:15 PM)
Hows it feel America to take it up the backside yet again?
A little KY wouldn't hurt.....
Report Comment
bear53, (10/27/2008 1:56:17 PM)
there needs to be a nation wide effort to vote out every politician that voted for the bailout & that includes all of the oklahoma legislators. inhofe & lucas didn't fool anyone because they knew there was enough 'yes' votes to push it through & they have re-elections coming up.
Report Comment
Bob 1, BA (10/27/2008 2:09:55 PM)
As one sheep said to another when the politician was walking away, " my but hurts"...............
Report Comment
TULSA_RULES, T.B.D. (10/27/2008 2:56:17 PM)
They should have listened to Ron Paul. I think he is the only one that can save the economy and the country.
Report Comment
molly1959, Tulsa (10/27/2008 4:49:08 PM)
"Might include Executive Bonus's"? And no one saw this coming? I must be a financial genius!
 

 
Add Your Comment 
In order to post a comment on this article, you must sign in to Tulsaworld.com. If you do not have a site account, you can create an account for free.

 
  
Post Your Comment
 


Most Popular Stories
Comments made yesterday 1,932
Total Comments 895,506
Register to make reader comments

Most Popular Stories




Tulsa World

Home | About Tulsa World | Advertise With Us | Privacy | Usage Agreement | FAQ and Help | Contact Us | Today's Headlines
Copyright © 2009, World Publishing Co. All rights reserved.




Advanced Search