MAKE US YOUR HOMEPAGE | Saturday, November 21, 2009 | WIRELESS CONTACT US | SUBSCRIBER SERVICES | SIGN IN SIGN OUT | MY PROFILE PAGE | MY ACCOUNT

Home > News > Article

Newspaper View Newspaper View      Print this story Print      Email this story Email      Comment Comment      RSS RSS     
Share      Bookmark Bookmark

Elections by party holds edge in poll
But supporters of non- partisan city elections nearly split the issue.
 
By OMER GILLHAM World Staff Writer
Published: 9/7/2009  2:24 AM
Last Modified: 9/7/2009  3:51 AM


View the Tulsa World’s city elections Web site for continuing coverage.


Tulsans are not convinced that nonpartisan elections are the best way to choose their mayor, auditor and city councilors, the Oklahoma Poll shows.

Forty-three percent of those polled believe that city elections should be held among candidates without a party affiliation while 48 percent oppose such an idea.

The responses come from voters who responded to the Oklahoma Poll conducted Aug. 29 to Sept. 1 by SoonerPoll.com. The poll involved 405 likely voters in the city of Tulsa.

Currently, candidates for municipal offices run as Republicans, Democrats and independents.

Among Democrats, 47 percent favored nonpartisan elections while only 35 percent of Republicans did so. Of the 21 independents polled, 81 percent favored nonpartisan voting.

Those who support nonpartisan city elections cited a variety of reasons that included bringing greater numbers of voters to the elections and more civility to city business.

Opponents of nonpartisan elections said they believe it is important for a person to know which party he or she is supporting.

Dorothy Gibbons, a Democrat, said she supports a nonpartisan election in hopes of diminishing
the acrimony that seems to accompany city business.

"We have had so much bickering among our city council and I just wonder if more people would run if they did not have a party attached to their name," Gibbons said. "Maybe they would treat each other more decently if they did not have a political party answer to. You also might get a better pool of candidates this way."

Roy Bankhead, a Republican, supports elections without a party affiliation because it would include voters who are currently left out of the process when the candidate from one party emerges from a primary election without an opponent.

"Nonpartisan races would open up an avenue for a lot more candidates and for more voters," Bankhead said. "You would have more people voting who would normally be left out because they are not from a particular party in the primary election."

Samuel Brackeen, a Democrat, said he opposes nonpartisan elections of city officials.

"They need a party affiliation so a person knows who he or she if voting for," Brackeen said. "If you don't have the party on the ballot, you might not know what party you are voting for. If there is no candidate in the other party, that's just the way it is."




About the Oklahoma Poll

SoonerPoll.com conducted the scientific telephone survey Aug. 29 to Sept. 1 of 405 likely voters registered in the city of Tulsa. The margin of error is plus or minus 4.87 percentage points.

The respondents consisted of 195 republicans, 189 Democrats and 21 independents selected randomly from voters who have established a frequent voting pattern.

The Oklahoma Poll is sponsored by the Tulsa World.


Omer Gillham 581-8301
omer.gillham@tulsaworld.com
By OMER GILLHAM World Staff Writer

Newspaper View Newspaper View      Print this story Print      Email this story Email      Comment Comment      RSS RSS     
Share      Bookmark Bookmark

Reader Comments
       Add your comment

5 comments have been made on this story so far. Tell us what you think below!

Report Comment Reporting Comments

If you see a comment that violates our terms and conditions, please help us by clicking the "Report this Comment" link next to a comment. That will alert the web staff to review the comment. Thank you.  -- Web Editor Jason Collington
 
 
Report Comment
Eagle 4, Tulsa (9/7/2009 8:17:57 AM)
It is the nature of humans to gather in packs, a leftover from times when carnivores or enemies picked off the weak or those who strayed too far from the group.

When Independence of thought should be a top priority while the herd instinct is driving us toward disaster, we persist in the archaic notion, lending support to those who claim to be with us while they seek their own personal comfort and aggrandizement.
Report Comment
Charley, (9/7/2009 9:13:00 AM)
I am sure the citizens of Tulsa will hold true to tradition & elect another loser mayor. Supporting a candidate that really wants to do something for the city & will actually get things done, because of their education & character, is not Tulsa style.

Don't believe me, look at the candidates. Voting democrat or republican is lunacy, look what these two groups have gotten us.
Report Comment
Teddy Bear 1975, Eufaula (9/7/2009 9:18:50 AM)
That will be better way to elect people. I think county should be the same way.
Report Comment
RAIDERS FAN, (9/7/2009 11:02:22 AM)
Charley,

AMEN!!! Both Democrats and Republicans have been the cause for the demise and dismantling of this country which is why I and millions of others have opted for third party.....whether it's Libertarian, Constitution,Independent or other. We pay taxes just the same as Democrats and Republicans.
That to me, is DISCRIMINATION. I want to vote the best candidate, not the party.

Many do NOT want a party per se. If anything, it should just be the American party and let people vote accordingly.

I think more Oklahomans ought to sincerely request this. Both of them are two heads of the same snake. I have had more than enough.

Maybe there's a candidate in one field that I would like to see and they happen to be Republican and another one that happens to be Democrat in another field....I should be able to vote for the person, regardless. This is a way of manipulating folks and keeping the pitting of parties going.

Also, it's NOT right that many other states have the third party option and here are once again, stuck with dumb and dumber. We should be able to write in a Candidate's name or even have something on the ballot that reads "none of the above" and that way, maybe give folks that really would be a benefit for the city and county a fair shake and good chance.

I'm going to keep fighting this because it's discrimination. What's even funnier is that sometimes Democrats want a Republican candidate in one field and Republicans want a Democrat candidate in another....people need to look at the people, not the party!!!
Report Comment
moogle, Tulsa (9/7/2009 11:45:53 AM)
Then there are those of us who consider disagreement and debate to be a good thing. I'm all in favor of anything that increases debate and decreases just shutting up and going along with the powers that be.

So, who exactly is driving this initiative to non-party elections? Grass-roots little guys, or somebody else?
 

 
Add Your Comment 
In order to post a comment on this article, you must sign in to Tulsaworld.com. If you do not have a site account, you can create an account for free.

 
  
Post Your Comment
 


Most Popular Stories
Comments made yesterday 1,932
Total Comments 897,351
Register to make reader comments

Most Popular Stories




Tulsa World

Home | About Tulsa World | Advertise With Us | Privacy | Usage Agreement | FAQ and Help | Contact Us | Today's Headlines
Copyright © 2009, World Publishing Co. All rights reserved.




Advanced Search