MAKE US YOUR HOMEPAGE | Tuesday, February 09, 2010 | WIRELESS CONTACT US | SUBSCRIBER SERVICES | SIGN IN SIGN OUT | MY PROFILE PAGE | MY ACCOUNT

Home > News > Article

Newspaper View Newspaper View      Print this story Print      Email this story Email      Comment Comment      RSS RSS     
Share      Bookmark Bookmark

Moving wind power not cheap
Utilities spending millions to build transmission lines.
 
By TOM LINDLEY World Capitol Bureau
Published: 8/11/2008  2:06 AM
Last Modified: 8/11/2008  2:49 AM

Utilities spending millions to build transmission lines.



The wind is free, but the cost of harnessing its power doesn't come cheaply. Each wind turbine can cost more than $1 million.

Transporting the power from western Oklahoma to the population centers is even more expensive. Texas, for example, is investing almost $5 billion to create its own transmission system.

In the first phase of its transmission line project, OG&E will spend $211 million to build a 345,000 volt line between Oklahoma City and Woodward. It will eventually connect to a 765,000 volt line that will be built by AEP-PSO and OG&E between Woodward and Guymon in the Panhandle.

AEP-PSO is already under contract to purchase about 393 megawatts of wind energy, and is evaluating proposals to purchase another 200 megawatts, which would expand its wind portfolio to about 12 percent of its electricity capacity, said Howard "Bud" Ground, manager of state governmental and environmental affairs for AEP-PSO.

To meet demand, he said AEP-PSO is shopping for another 450-600 megawatts of power and will ask the Legislature to consider incentives that could pave the way for nuclear power plants in Oklahoma.

At 5 p.m. on Tuesday, AEP-PSO set an unofficial peak record at 4,216 megawatts, passing the old record set Aug. 13, 2007, by 41 megawatts, Ground said.

"Wind is not going to solve all the generation problems," Ground said. Because it isn't, utilities have been reluctant to rely too heavily on wind because it can't compete with natural gas or coal as being a reliable source of power.

However, wind speculators are spending more than ever to sign leases to allow them to construct wind towers across northwestern Oklahoma, primarily north of Interstate 40 and west of Interstate 35.

"If you get a turbine on your farm, it will bring the average of $5,000 to $8,000 a year, and the price is going up," Greene said. "It used to be one developer might be knocking on the door. Now it's several developers, and a farmer can replace $10 in hay with a $5,000 turbine."


Wind turbine facts



  • About two wind turbines can fit on one acre of land.

  • At maximum speed of 20 revolutions per minute, the tips of blades are moving at 180 mph.

  • A 1-megawatt turbine can power 300 Oklahoma homes.

The average wind turbine:

  • Total weight: 187,000 pounds


  • Tower height: 260 feet


  • Base diameter: 14 feet


  • Length of blades: 121 feet


Source: Oklahoma Wind Power Initiative

By TOM LINDLEY World Capitol Bureau

Newspaper View Newspaper View      Print this story Print      Email this story Email      Comment Comment      RSS RSS     
Share      Bookmark Bookmark

Reader Comments
       Add your comment

5 comments have been made on this story so far. Tell us what you think below!

Report Comment Reporting Comments

If you see a comment that violates our terms and conditions, please help us by clicking the "Report this Comment" link next to a comment. That will alert the web staff to review the comment. Thank you.  -- Web Editor Jason Collington
 
 
Report Comment
Legal Citizen, (8/12/2008 12:50:03 PM)
Tony: "I would go much further and put a small wind turbine on every sign pole, light pole, traffic signal etc."

LOL!

Oh, wait... were you serious?
Report Comment
Hijinx, (8/11/2008 10:05:32 AM)
Nuclear, is very expensive to build and operate. You think this wind deal is costly, just wait till you get the bill for a new “Black Fox”.
Not to mention what to do with waste that has a 10,000 year half life. Burying it is the equivalent of burying your head in the sand. Until that problem is solved I cant support nukes.
Report Comment
BobInTulsa, (8/11/2008 10:04:24 AM)
If the house is on a large lot, an acre or so, a residential wind turbine might make sense. The tower needs to be 80 to 120 feet tall. Personal wind turbines won't work for everyone. Going solar will be more practical for many. A wind turbine on every street lamp would not work. A Google of "wind turbine residential" will locate an article, "What do I need to know...." that has more information on the subject.
Report Comment
Graychin, Eucha (8/11/2008 9:22:30 AM)
Some up-front investment, then zero fuel cost.

There's no such thing as a free lunch, but this comes very close.
Report Comment
Tony G, (8/11/2008 6:58:14 AM)
Why so big? I think we would do better to downsize these monsters and add one to every home in Oklahoma. I would go much further and put a small wind turbine on every sign pole, light pole, traffic signal etc.
 

 
Add Your Comment 
In order to post a comment on this article, you must sign in to Tulsaworld.com. If you do not have a site account, you can create an account for free.

 
  
Post Your Comment
 


Most Popular Stories
Comments made yesterday 2,015
Total Comments 1,033,359
Register to make reader comments

Most Popular Stories




Tulsa World

Home | About Tulsa World | Advertise With Us | Privacy | Usage Agreement | FAQ and Help | Contact Us | Today's Headlines
Copyright © 2010, World Publishing Co. All rights reserved.




Advanced Search