MAKE US YOUR HOMEPAGE | Wednesday, February 10, 2010 | WIRELESS CONTACT US | SUBSCRIBER SERVICES | SIGN IN SIGN OUT | MY PROFILE PAGE | MY ACCOUNT

Home > News > Article

Newspaper View Newspaper View      Print this story Print      Email this story Email      Comment Comment      RSS RSS     
Share      Bookmark Bookmark

Votes of the dead may not be fraud
An election official says a report dug up mostly clerical errors.
 
By GAVIN OFF World Data Editor
Published: 6/3/2009  2:25 AM
Last Modified: 6/3/2009  9:48 AM


Related stories: A few Sooners vote after dying.

Election Board secretary offers explanations for apparent votes by dead.


After a Tulsa World investigation found that as many as 10 Oklahomans apparently had voted after their deaths in recent years, a state official said there are logical explanations for at least nine of the cast ballots.

State Election Board Secretary Paul Ziriax said Tuesday that documents showed no proof of voter fraud. His comments came in response to a story in Sunday's Tulsa World.

"In the vast majority of the 10 cases identified by the Tulsa World, it appears that data entry errors are the culprit," Ziriax said in a statement.

In five cases, voters apparently signed the wrong line in the precinct registry. The mistakes led to data entry errors when county election board officials logged voter history into a database.

One of those cases involved a deceased voter whose son shares the same name.

In two cases, no signature was written next to the deceased's name. Again, data entry errors likely caused the mistakes, Ziriax said.

And in two more cases, voters appeared to have cast an absentee ballot just days before their deaths. Thus, the ballots were still legal under state law.

Ziriax said a 2006 case involving a Lincoln County man is still under investigation.

To find the inconsistent ballots, the World joined an Election Board database of some 12 million votes cast since 1999 with a Department of Health database of Oklahomans who died in recent years.

The investigation found that as many as 10 people were marked as voting after their deaths and as many as 429 deceased Oklahomans were still registered to vote.


Gavin Off 732-8106
gavin.off@tulsaworld.com
By GAVIN OFF World Data Editor

Newspaper View Newspaper View      Print this story Print      Email this story Email      Comment Comment      RSS RSS     
Share      Bookmark Bookmark

Reader Comments
       Add your comment

21 comments have been made on this story so far. Tell us what you think below!

Report Comment Reporting Comments

If you see a comment that violates our terms and conditions, please help us by clicking the "Report this Comment" link next to a comment. That will alert the web staff to review the comment. Thank you.  -- Web Editor Jason Collington
 
 
Some reader comments for this story were copied from "Election Board secretary offers explanations for apparent votes by dead ," which was published on 6/2/2009.

Report Comment
tbgalileo, Tulsa (6/2/2009 5:15:59 PM)
So if I'm reading this right, there is 1 questionable ballot out of 12 million? And this was worthy of a "scandal" story? Come on TW......
Report Comment
quixote, Tulsa (6/2/2009 7:33:54 PM)
Calling Greychin. Come in Greychin, come in Greychin.

You're right again.

(How can he be the most ignored TW blogger? Maybe because he closes the door so well with his comments that there's not much left to say.)
Report Comment
concernedpapa, Kiefer (6/3/2009 6:27:34 AM)
Jim
Your not holding your breath are you? To me this was a non event when it was written if and i say IF there were 10 cases of possible fraud out or 12 million votes I can live with hat regardess which way the votes were cast.
Report Comment
Travis, Tahlequah (6/3/2009 6:35:25 AM)
I wonder how many ineligible votes were cast. I guess we will never know since we had no requirement to present an ID to vote.
Report Comment
QLC, (6/3/2009 7:37:14 AM)
I don't see how presenting an id would have anything to do with this. The person could still sign the wrong line. The vote wasn't wrong, just the credit.

I can't believe all of this fuss over 10 votes.

Travis, go back to bed. There is nothing for you to see here.
Report Comment
Angry Citizen!, Bluejacket (6/3/2009 8:04:47 AM)
Do we need to run out and get our voter's licenses (for a nominal fee) yet?
Report Comment
Peter Piper, TULSA (6/3/2009 8:05:01 AM)
Mr. Purdy, you'll go nutty yourself checking out all these bloggers/soothsayers! I wouldn't give them the time of day. Many are still trying to locate Pres. Obama's birth certificate! Some have nothing else to do all day long!
Report Comment
Ignatz, Broken Bow (6/3/2009 8:30:01 AM)
This never was a real news story from the get-go.There never was any "voter fraud" in Ok. If the "ID" proposal wouldn't disenfranchise Democrats the Republicans would not be supporting it, simple as that.
Report Comment
wardog, Miami (6/3/2009 8:49:05 AM)
Hey the dead guys probably understand it better...lol
Report Comment
Graychin, Eucha (6/3/2009 9:25:30 AM)
Quixote: Here I am! And thanks for your kind words. But have you checked the leaderboard recently? There's a new champ in the "most ignored" category.

To everyone else - I TOLD YOU SO!

Fraudulent voting in Oklahoma is a myth, a lie spread by forces who want to suppress the votes of eligible voters. "Voter ID" is their latest method of choice. In the old days, it was goons at the polls.

As my much-missed friend Bville Yellow Dog used to say, "When voters vote, Democrats win."
Report Comment
ajohnb, Jenks (6/3/2009 9:31:02 AM)
And all of you believe that the State Election Board would not blame this on "data entry errors"?

If they admitted there was any indication of fraud, then that would make every election suspect and fuel the State Legislature to take actions that would cost the Election board money.

I am still troubled about a friend that I know that went to vote and his name had already been signed to the book. He ended up voting as a "provisional vote". How much of this has gone on?

I am just saying that it would be very easy to commit voter fraud in this state.
Report Comment
Skeptic, Tulsa (6/3/2009 10:05:15 AM)
If signing on the wrong line by mistake is viewed as voter fraud, then yes ajohnb, it is easy. Is there any proof, that presenting an ID will eliminate this time of...."fraud"? I doubt it.

As Ignatz said, "If the "ID" proposal wouldn't disenfranchise Democrats the Republicans would not be supporting it."
Report Comment
Graychin, Eucha (6/3/2009 11:41:13 AM)
Once at the polls, someone had signed a name in my wife's space by mistake. It was easy to see who made the mistake. So the poll worker told my wife to sign on that person's line.

Big deal.

Easy to commit voter fraud? It would be easy to run down Main Street stark naked, too. But no one ever does.
Report Comment
zzx375, BA (6/3/2009 11:42:29 AM)
And dead votes don't count, right?
Report Comment
dukeera, Jenks (6/3/2009 12:58:34 PM)
"How can [Graychin] be the most ignored TW blogger?"

On the political spectrum between liberals and conservatives, take a guess which side tends to be more closeminded, rejecting any notion that does not agree with their preconceived beliefs.
Report Comment
cheesepoff, (6/3/2009 1:10:52 PM)
We need voter ID. Dead voting is a small problem compared to some of the other types of Voter fraud. Don't give me that crap about old people not voting. Nursing homes and care center have transportation to polls and if some one really wants to vote they can get an ID. We need ID for every thing else why not voting.
Report Comment
ajohnb, Jenks (6/3/2009 1:11:19 PM)
The problem with my friend was, that someone had signed HIS name on the book. It was not just a case of signing on the wrong line but an obvious case of someone impersonating him.

Of course, he was allowed a "provisional ballot".

And the election was not close so his one votes would have made no difference no matter what candidate he voted for.

Point is, election fraud occurs. How widespread, who knows? But not having to show any ID at all to vote lends itself to having voter fraus whether people want to believe it or not.
Report Comment
concernedpapa, Kiefer (6/3/2009 1:39:29 PM)
cheesepoff said
"We need ID for everything else why not voting."
I will agree with you totally cheesepoff if you and all your "friends" will fill out a profile before you make a post. Until then remain in the shadows lurking i the corner.
Report Comment
bearway, Jenks (6/3/2009 2:09:19 PM)
Who is Wanda Kinkade? Seems that saying there is no Voter Fraud makes it so, regardless of the facts and convictions in the 80's. But hey, why let truth and fact get in the way of a good bit of propaganda?
Report Comment
Tulsashooter, Tulsa (6/3/2009 2:47:05 PM)
I'm only catching up to this story so my question is borne of lack of specific information. The question I have though is ... according to TBGalileo in the first entry, of the "..12 million" ... one was found to be unexplained. Were 12 million actually surveyed, or were simply an appreciable sample obtained and the results were projected? Surveying 12 million of anything is very labor intensive.
Report Comment
Peter Piper, TULSA (6/3/2009 3:09:23 PM)
At my precinct in Tulsa, the three ladies are 90, 83, and 77. Two I know well. When 6, 8,or 10 people come piling in to vote, I can see how names could get jumbled around or someone could forget to sign--THE HUMAN FACTOR--QUIT RIDING THIS OLD VOTER FRAUD NAG!! IT DOESN'T EXIST!
 

 
Add Your Comment 
In order to post a comment on this article, you must sign in to Tulsaworld.com. If you do not have a site account, you can create an account for free.

 
  
Post Your Comment
 


Most Popular Stories
Comments made yesterday 2,108
Total Comments 1,034,078
Register to make reader comments

Most Popular Stories




Tulsa World

Home | About Tulsa World | Advertise With Us | Privacy | Usage Agreement | FAQ and Help | Contact Us | Today's Headlines
Copyright © 2010, World Publishing Co. All rights reserved.




Advanced Search