MAKE US YOUR HOMEPAGE | Tuesday, February 09, 2010 | WIRELESS CONTACT US | SUBSCRIBER SERVICES | SIGN IN SIGN OUT | MY PROFILE PAGE | MY ACCOUNT

Home > News > Article

Newspaper View Newspaper View      Print this story Print      Email this story Email      Comment Comment      RSS RSS     
Share      Bookmark Bookmark

Rep. Lucas grills Geithner on bailout plan
The Oklahoma lawmaker compares it with the state's meltdown in 1980s.

Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner (left), accompanied by Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke and president and chief executive officer of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York William Dudley, testifies Tuesday on Capitol Hill in Washington before a House Financial Services Committee hearing on AIG. Evan Vucci/Associated Press
 
By JIM MYERS World Washington Bureau
Published: 3/25/2009  2:23 AM
Last Modified: 3/25/2009  3:06 AM

WASHINGTON — U.S. Rep. Frank Lucas on Tuesday recalled new millionaires minted from Oklahoma's financial meltdown in the 1980s as he questioned Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner about dealings with AIG and other bailed-out firms.

"It was fascinating after the FDIC got done stomping through the arena how, five and 10 and 15 years later, amazingly, there were some millionaires made of dealing and disposing of these assets,'' the Oklahoma Republican said.

He described for Geithner the economic fallout of Oklahoma's "twin ag and energy resources boom and bust'' nearly 30 years ago.

Sometimes, Lucas said, agriculture and energy properties were so dramatically undervalued that, for some of them, it took a decade to bounce back.

He questioned Geithner about whether that sort of tremendous economic gain could be possible for those who invest in the new public/private plan the Obama administration has laid out to dispose of banks' toxic assets.

"For the taxpayer, too,'' Geithner responded. "The taxpayer would share equally in those gains.''

In his exchange with Lucas, the treasury secretary confirmed that investors also could end up losing their entire investment.

Geithner said Americans would be able to participate through companies that manage pension assets.

That statement seemed to give Lucas pause.

Geithner went on to say "the idea is to allow the American people to benefit alongside the government in any potential gains and the taxpayers, of course, ultimately get a better deal with this kind of structure than they would if the government simply took on all the risks.''

Lucas also raised the question of stock options that might be used by firms to compensate employees.

"Is that something that we should be prepared for as public officials to explain to the folks back home two years, three years, and five years down the road?'' he asked.

Geithner cited President Obama's proposal on compensation to ensure firms are not offering incentives for excessive risk-taking.

That kind of incentive, he said, overwhelmed the checks and balances in place.

During his opening statement to the House Financial Services Committee, Geithner laid out plans for new regulations that would allow the government to essentially take over large, complex, nonbank firms such as AIG.

"Our regulatory system was not equipped to prevent the buildup of dangerous levels of risk,'' Geithner said.

"There is no effective legal mechanism to unwind a non-bank financial institution like AIG.''

Geithner is scheduled to return to the committee later this week to discuss the administration's request in more detail.

On the other side of the Capitol, Sen. Jim Inhofe, R-Okla., criticized the government's response to the economic crisis.

"We have to put an end to the Geithner approach on bailouts,'' Inhofe said.

He announced his introduction of a bill that he said would bar release of additional bailout funds to AIG, even though taxpayers through various federal actions own about 80 percent of that firm.

Inhofe dismissed concerns that such a limitation could harm the value of AIG's assets, adding such a drop would be less than the $30 billion still to be handed out.

He conceded his legislation will not be taken up by the Senate.




Jim Myers (202) 484-1424
jim.myers@tulsaworld.com
By JIM MYERS World Washington Bureau

Newspaper View Newspaper View      Print this story Print      Email this story Email      Comment Comment      RSS RSS     
Share      Bookmark Bookmark

Reader Comments
       Add your comment

8 comments have been made on this story so far. Tell us what you think below!

Report Comment Reporting Comments

If you see a comment that violates our terms and conditions, please help us by clicking the "Report this Comment" link next to a comment. That will alert the web staff to review the comment. Thank you.  -- Web Editor Jason Collington
 
 
Some reader comments for this story were copied from "Lucas questions Treasury Secretary about AIG," which was published on 3/24/2009.

Report Comment
Popeye, T-Town (3/24/2009 7:52:56 PM)
Another article in the TW today spelled out, in simplistic terms, what actually led to the debacle we're mired in: Sub-prime mortgages, their predictable failures and the false demand they infected the economy with that led to the housing valuation bubble.

Let's face it: it was Carter, Clinton and countless other vote seeking whores that forced lenders to speculate in a market of mullets. Now, after forcing lenders to ignore time proven lending practices at the risk of punitive federal actions, the entire country is paying for the actions of past liberal administrations.

This isn't government, this is blackmail.

One only need to look at the efforts of N.Y. AG Cuomo: his threats to expose the names and addresses of AIG employees that received bonuses (that the government was fully aware of) is another example of government blackmail. Don't think for a second that Obama and Geithner aren't fully aware of his actions and in full agreement to them.
Report Comment
fredsdad, Tulsa, OK (3/24/2009 8:04:55 PM)
Popeye,

Which article?
Report Comment
Ignatz, Broken Bow (3/24/2009 8:40:56 PM)
Popeye, that simply is not true and flies in the face of every, credible independent evaluation of the current situation, starting with the findings of the Federal Reserve Bank blaming unregulated derivative trading among financial institutions.No regulation has been the linchpin of Republican policy since Reagan. W Bush himself announced that every American should be able to get a mortgage and own a home. More people will probably have mortgages foreclosed because of job loss than variable rate acceleration.
Report Comment
fredsdad, Tulsa, OK (3/24/2009 9:27:14 PM)
Ignatz,

As you may recall, I have researched this a bit. The bubble started leaking in late 2006 when housing supply and demand began to equalize, and price escalation slowed or stopped. It accelerated rapidly in 2008 when energy prices went up, and those barely holding on could either pay a mortgage or buy gas. Also in 2006 & 7 credit began tightening, and many banks arbitrarily reduced credit lines on credit cards, lowering peoples credit scores. In 2008, along with higher energy, many ARM's took the maximum adjustment. Even those who might have afforded to keep their homes could not when the rate maxed out. They could not refi because their credit scores and appraisals had gone down. The major wave of foreclosures began before unemployment began to rise.

AIG's problems were arguably due to a lack of regulation, but they were pretty well insulated from regulation through their political contributions - mostly to Democrats, but with a generous share going to well placed Republicans. It was mostly a mentality of "the good times will never end". Unfortunately for us all, they always do.

Bush, incidentally, made 13 different attempts (per NY Times) at reining in the fm's and their securitized products. Every effort, some admittedly half-hearted, was blocked by ranking Democrats on the financial and banking committees in Congress.
Report Comment
Popeye, T-Town (3/25/2009 1:07:38 AM)
Tulsa World, 3/24/09, Page A3: Origins of financial meltdown, plans to resolve it are explained.
"It started in early 2007, when the mortgage crisis hit and defaults on subprime home loans, those made to borrowers with tarnished credit histories, began to climb. That gutted the value of the mortgage-backed securities -- subprime mortgages bundled together and sold on Wall Street to investors -- listed on the books of the big banks."
Report Comment
Eagle 4, Tulsa (3/25/2009 7:14:28 AM)
Blind Party loyalty is what the Fat cats of Washington count on to keep the American people divided and helpless while they plunder our National assets.
Wake up! Those most strident in defense of their Party are the blindest, regardless of their cut and paste abilities.
A monster is consuming us and the blind people are arguing over the size of its teeth, the foulness of its breath and length of its claws. How sad.
Report Comment
justiceawaits, Claremore (3/25/2009 8:20:38 AM)
Well said fredsdad.
Eagle 4 is also correct.
We need to follow the money, not the political affiliation of those involved.
Regardless of how it started, we need to let these Polititions know we are watching them now.
Geither asked Dodd to insert the langage into the stimulus Bill that allowed AIG to kep their bonuses.Congress signed the bill.
Did they not read the bill they were signing,Are they to stupid to understand what it said, or is it as I suspect, a whole lot of them have AIG political contributions in their pockets also and simply have not been "outed" yet?
Report Comment
DonInTulsa, (3/25/2009 3:21:35 PM)
AIG dug their own grave when they issued Credit Default Sweep protection on those bad loans without having the assets to back them up. Lose your AAA rating, and boom suddenly you have to pony up the cash. This whole mess is because the banks and mortgage lenders made stupid loan decisions, then pawned them off on someone else, leaving them holding the bag. Warren Buffett warned in 2003 that these derivatives were weapons of financial mass destruction. Government was also complicit in this, encouraging bad lending and not providing oversight as these companies bet the farm and lost. The banks lied about how safe the CDOs were and the rating agencies went ahead and rubber stamped them AAA. I must say, this whole process has been very educational for me. I didn't realize there were so many ways to screw the American people and innocent investors. Bernie Madoff would be proud.
 

 
Add Your Comment 
In order to post a comment on this article, you must sign in to Tulsaworld.com. If you do not have a site account, you can create an account for free.

 
  
Post Your Comment
 


Most Popular Stories
Comments made yesterday 2,015
Total Comments 1,033,767
Register to make reader comments

Most Popular Stories




Tulsa World

Home | About Tulsa World | Advertise With Us | Privacy | Usage Agreement | FAQ and Help | Contact Us | Today's Headlines
Copyright © 2010, World Publishing Co. All rights reserved.




Advanced Search