MAKE US YOUR HOMEPAGE | Tuesday, March 16, 2010 | WIRELESS CONTACT US | SUBSCRIBER SERVICES | SIGN IN SIGN OUT | MY PROFILE PAGE | MY ACCOUNT

Home > News > Article

PDF Index Newspaper View Print Print Email Email Comment Comment RSS RSS Bookmark Share


Panel OKs climate bill with Republicans away
Sen. Jim Inhofe argues that the Democrats-only vote violated rules.

By JIM MYERS World Washington Bureau


WASHINGTON — A key Senate committee ended a days-long Republican boycott led by U.S. Sen. Jim Inhofe when it voted Thursday to send a sweeping climate change bill to the Senate floor.

Following the 11-1 vote with no Republicans present, Inhofe, R-Okla., claimed that the action not only violated committee rules but signaled the death knell for the bill.

He said the vote, which he termed the "nuclear option," would bolster his case against global warming next month at a climate meeting in Copenhagen that some hope will produce an international agreement on the issue.

"It's all about Copenhagen," Inhofe said of the vote by the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee.

No one was predicting an easy path or a quick vote for the legislation.

Sen. Lindsey Graham, a South Carolina Republican who appears to be becoming a key player on the bill, agreed that the version approved by the committee would not draw the 60 votes usually needed for Senate passage.

Graham said the committee's vote helped in advance of the Copenhagen meeting.

The message for that meeting must be that the U.S. is taking the issue seriously, he said.

Graham and Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., who introduced the bill, are part of a group that is trying to come up with another version that could attract the votes needed to overcome procedural hurdles on the floor.

The House approved its version of the bill earlier.

Inhofe perhaps is the most vocal skeptic
in Congress of man-made global warming. He dismisses the urgency that others place on efforts to pass a bill addressing the issue.

He was the only Republican to attend the committee's session, but he left for another meeting shortly before the vote.

Inhofe once again expressed Republicans' request for a complete economic analysis of the huge bill before the committee acted.

Republicans believe that the Environmental Protection Agency had agreed to do that review, which would take weeks.

The committee's chairwoman, Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., cited a EPA briefing earlier this week and said she had concluded that additional analysis at this point would be duplicative and a waste of money.

The bill has already gone under unprecedented review, she said.

The bill needs to move to reduce pollution, address the country's dependence on foreign oil and create jobs, she said.

"This is a jobs bill, make no mistake about it," she said.

Boxer rejected Inhofe's claim that Thursday's vote violated any Senate rule.

Sen. Max Baucus, D-Mont., who cast the lone "no" vote, said the target in the bill remained too high. Such a goal would require that other countries play by the same rule, he said.


Jim Myers (202) 484-1424
jim.myers@tulsaworld.com

PDF Index Newspaper View Print Print Email Email Comment Comment RSS RSS Bookmark Share



Reader Comments


If you see a comment that violates our terms and conditions, please help us by clicking the "Report Comment" link next to a comment. That will alert the web staff to review the comment. Thank you, Web Editor Jason Collington Report Comment

Some reader comments for this page were copied from "Senate committee passes climate bill," which was published on 11/5/2009.

Comments
Bville, (4 months ago)
The pot water for we American frogs just got a little warmer.
Tulsa Kayaker, Tulsa (4 months ago)
What say all you Inhofe supporters now? Yesterday you totally agreed with his boycott, saying Jimmy knows whats up. We don't need this.

Now, he changed his old mind. What say you now? Is he an old idiot like I said, or a turncoat? Either way.....
douglassm, tulsa (4 months ago)
What a buffoon.
Sanity, Broken Arrow (4 months ago)
Tulsa Kayaker, I say, you will be sorry, yes very sorry.
Dr. Strangelove, Tulsa (4 months ago)
Boxer and Inhofe were holding hands yesterday, maybe they heated things up a little last night? Who knows.
my view, Sand Springs (4 months ago)
Tulsa Kayaker,

Inhofe didn't vote for the bill he left before they voted. It won't pass in the Senate, this bill is dead on arrival. I doubt they'll have enough votes to bring it to a vote.
Tulsa Kayaker, Tulsa (4 months ago)
Sanity,
I would inquire as to why you think I will be sorry?

Will I eat some bad chinese food today?
flyingtheo, Broken Arrow (4 months ago)
Dr. Strangelove, too funny! She acts and sounds like she would definitely be a bum lay all right. But seriously, we don't need legislation that is going to make our economy worse at this time, when will we reach the tipping point where we plunge into a full blown Depression with all of this liberalism?
JDAM77, Cleveland, OH; formerly Tulsa (4 months ago)
From Fox News:

"The 98-page report, co-authored by EPA analyst Alan Carlin, pushed back on the prospect of regulating gases like carbon dioxide as a way to reduce global warming. Carlin's report argued that the information the EPA was using was out of date, and that even as atmospheric carbon dioxide levels have increased, global temperatures have declined."

Inhofe was attempting to get this report included.

I know, I know, Fox News isn't a credible source, supports slavery, and is sympathetic to Christians.
pdillo, Tulsa (4 months ago)
haha, you'll be sorry because a bunch of brainwashed republicans are going to comment on the tulsa world site.... world watch out!
Unbelieving, (4 months ago)
The liberal mind must suffer from something like Mad Cow disease. Nancy Pelosi says that Dems won on Tuesday night and Boxer passes this crap onto the floor? Is it liberalism or the air in CA? Goodness!
Unbelieving, (4 months ago)
pdillo, brainwashed Repubs? It wasn't US that believed BHO would save the world! Be my guess YOU did!
pdillo, Tulsa (4 months ago)
JDAM77, sympathetic to conservatives, not Christians. There are plenty of liberal Christians that think somehow preserving our planet is a good thing. Last time I checked, exhaust was toxic. Its too bad we are addicted to oil. Crack makes crack dealers money too.
edelweiss, Tulsa (4 months ago)
Inhofe is and always has been a bufoon, and a major embarrassment to our state. I can't wait until the old coot quits. The Okie neo-cons will continue to elect him. Pure silliness!!!
pdillo, Tulsa (4 months ago)
(And for the record, Unbelieving, I wanted to vote for Ron Paul.)
Ayo, T-Town (4 months ago)
No one whose opinion counts
counts Inhofe's opinion
as having merit.
Unbelieving, (4 months ago)
Pdillo, so intelligent! Thanks for proving my point!
18thandBoston, (4 months ago)
Glenn Beck said global warming isn't real and he's on TV so he has to be telling the truth.

Thanks for defending America from something or other, Inhofe!
Unbelieving, (4 months ago)
Edelweiss, I'm sure the folks from Picher would disagree with you. I know the folks in the military would.
Angry Citizen!, Bluejacket (4 months ago)
Partisan posturing from the California leftists, this bill is DOA because of Boxer's refusal to study its economic impact.
pdillo, Tulsa (4 months ago)
DOA if the red-necks on the tulsa world site have anything to do with it!
Dr. Strangelove, Tulsa (4 months ago)
flyingtheo- you know Inhofe probably had a shot at Pelosi back in the old intelligence committee days, haha
Welcome to America !, Claremore (4 months ago)
Thanks once again for standing up for what is right Inhofe.
Ayo, T-Town (4 months ago)
Unbelieving, Mad Cow Disease is Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy; Bovine meaning Cow, hence Mad Cow Disease.

While this is related to Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease which is what humans can contract, it isn't the same thing. These two diseases along with several others (Chronic wasting disease which affects several species of undulates, and Scrapie which affects sheep) are caused by prions. Prions are proteins and are not a virus or a bacterium. Prions lack a nucleic acid.

You may want to rethink throwing names around if you haven't even the least bit of knowledge of what you're talking about.

This is precisely why I discount the opinion of laymen who think they have all the answers to climate change. Most of them don't know squat. And, you've just proven that.
psychedelikrelik, Tulsa (4 months ago)
LOL, Ayo!

Unbelieving is back for another day of gettin' schooled!

Unbelievable!
25 of 61 comments displayed  |  View All


Add Your Comment
In order to post a comment on this page, you must sign in to Tulsaworld.com. If you do not have a site account, you can create an account for free.
Most Popular Stories
Comments made yesterday 1,708
Total Comments 1,093,218
Register to make reader comments

Most Popular Stories




Tulsa World

Home | About Tulsa World | Advertise With Us | Privacy | Usage Agreement | FAQ and Help | Contact Us | Today's Headlines
Copyright © 2010, World Publishing Co. All rights reserved.




Advanced Search