MAKE US YOUR HOMEPAGE | Tuesday, February 09, 2010 | WIRELESS CONTACT US | SUBSCRIBER SERVICES | SIGN IN SIGN OUT | MY PROFILE PAGE | MY ACCOUNT

Home > News > Article

Print this story Print      Email this story Email      Comment Comment      RSS RSS     
Share      Bookmark Bookmark

Bird deaths soar at wind farms

Wind turbines in Wallula Junction, Wash. (AP Photo/Walla Walla Union-Bulletin, Jeff Horner)
 
By Associated Press
Published: 9/21/2009  9:40 PM
Last Modified: 9/21/2009  9:40 PM

For years, a huge wind farm in California's San Joaquin Valley was slaughtering thousands of birds, including golden eagles, red-tailed hawks and burrowing owls.

The raptors would get sliced up by the blades on the roughly 5,400 turbines in Altamont Pass, or electrocuted by the wind farm's power lines. Scientists, wildlife agencies and turbine experts came together in an attempt to solve the problem. The result?

Protective measures put in place in an effort to reduce deaths by 50% failed. Deaths in fact soared for three of four bird species studied, said the Altamont Pass Wind Resource Area Bird Fatality Study.

The slaughter at Altamont Pass is being raised by avian scientists who say the drive among environmentalists to rapidly boost U.S. wind farm power 20 times could lead to massive bird losses and even extinctions.

New wind projects "have the potential of killing a lot of migratory birds," said Michael Fry, director of conservation advocacy at the American Bird Conservancy in Washington.

Wind projects are being proposed for the Texas Gulf, the Atlantic Coast, the Great Plains and Upper Midwest. President Obama said in April that he would allow turbines along the Atlantic as one way to help meet a goal by environmentalists and the industry of generating 20% of the nation's electricity through wind by 2030.

Currently about 1% of U.S. power comes from wind, according to the American Wind Energy Association.

"There's concern because of the scale of what we're talking about," said Shawn Smallwood, a Davis, Calif., ecologist and researcher. "Just the sheer numbers of turbines we're talking about - we're going to be killing so many raptors until there are no more raptors, in my opinion."

Working on the problemWorking on the problem

Interior Secretary Ken Salazar is aware of the problem and says the administration is working with energy companies and wildlife groups to help lessen the deaths.

"I think we will be able to minimize the number of birds being killed, just in terms of sheer numbers," Salazar said. "The fact that some birds will be killed is a reality."

Officials in the wind energy industry say migratory birds and birds of prey, including eagles, are killed each year at some of the nation's biggest wind farms, but they say the concerns are overstated.

Laurie Jodziewicz, manager of siting policy for the American Wind Energy Association, said the industry has taken steps to reduce bird deaths.

"We have hundreds and hundreds of projects all over the country that are not having those impacts," she said, referring to Altamont.

Bird deaths cannot be completely eliminated, she said. "There will be some birds that are killed because they do collide with so many structures," she said.

Salazar said new technology in the design of turbines and more careful placement, such as outside of migratory paths and away from ridgelines, can reduce bird deaths.

Fry says other methods include using radar to detect and shut down turbines when migratory birds approach, building towers higher and with more space between them, and placing them away from areas where raptors hunt for small animals.

"Technology has evolved over the last several decades in significant ways," Salazar said. "We know how to do wind farms in ways that minimize and mitigate the effect on birds and wildlife."

Non-wind utilizes fined heavily

Some see a double standard for wind farms.

ExxonMobil pleaded guilty in federal court in August to the deaths of 85 birds at its operations in several states, according to the Department of Justice. The birds were protected by the Migratory Bird Treaty Act, and Exxon agreed to pay $600,000 in fines and fees. In July, the PacifiCorp utility of Oregon was ordered to pay $10.5 million in fines, restitution and improvements to their equipment after 232 eagles were killed by running into power lines in Wyoming, according to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.

That is far fewer than the estimated 10,000 birds (nearly all protected by the migratory bird law) that are being killed every year at Altamont, according to Robert Bryce, author of Gusher of Lies: The Dangerous Delusions of "Energy Independence."

Salazar said he expected his department's Fish and Wildlife Service task force will recommend guidelines for wind farms that are friendlier to birds.

Bird advocates raise doubts about the impact, because the guidelines are voluntary. "It's still entirely up to power companies where to place towers," said Gavin Shire, spokesman for the American Bird Conservancy.

By Associated Press

Print this story Print      Email this story Email      Comment Comment      RSS RSS     
Share      Bookmark Bookmark

Reader Comments
       Add your comment

14 comments have been made on this story so far. Tell us what you think below!

Report Comment Reporting Comments

If you see a comment that violates our terms and conditions, please help us by clicking the "Report this Comment" link next to a comment. That will alert the web staff to review the comment. Thank you.  -- Web Editor Jason Collington
 
 
Report Comment
Ayo, T-Town (9/21/2009 10:05:54 PM)
Actually GOP, this is old news. We've known for a long time that wind farms were devastating for birds.

Now what I would like to know is why the fines over the Exxon Valdez fiasco because of some drunk has never been paid.
Report Comment
cweaver, (9/21/2009 10:13:43 PM)
gaw, this aint rocket science, just create a no fly zone for the birds in that area or, air traffic controllers could adjust their aptitude till their out of the danger zone,thats why we pay em aint it, gaw
Report Comment
Proud Muslim, Tulsa: Coolest place in the world (almost) (9/21/2009 10:45:35 PM)
Ayo's right, this isn't a new problem. Birds and bats have been suffering from wind farms for a while now. That doesn't mean we shouldn't stop the search for alternative fuel, because we still need it badly, both for the economy and the environment. It means we need to either drop the wind power option or find a solution to the problem.

Fewer birds and bats means more bugs. Also, trees that depend on birds and/or bats to spread their seeds, or for pollination, may experience a drop in population.

Care.
Report Comment
Legal Citizen, . (9/21/2009 10:50:08 PM)
For some reason, the irony of this story was bringing a smile to my face. I could envision global-warming wackos running around like the Keystone Cops trying to save the planet while simultaneously saving the birds.

Then I read this paragraph:
ExxonMobil pleaded guilty in federal court in August to the deaths of 85 birds at its operations in several states, according to the Department of Justice. The birds were protected by the Migratory Bird Treaty Act, and Exxon agreed to pay $600,000 in fines and fees. In July, the PacifiCorp utility of Oregon was ordered to pay $10.5 million in fines, restitution and improvements to their equipment after 232 eagles were killed by running into power lines in Wyoming"

...and I busted out laughing. Only liberals would set out to kill the goose that laid the golden egg. $600K for accidentally killing 85 birds. $10.5M for killing 232. Their hatred of Big Oil supersedes their concern for the planet. A few more idiotic lawsuits like that and others will think twice before building any more wind farms.
Report Comment
Red Barron, (9/21/2009 10:52:37 PM)
This only eliminates those birds not smart enough to fly into spinning blades. Have you ever seen how slow they turn? Come on it's not like a propeller on an airplane. Survival of the fittest. Who gets the money we pay in fines? I say we because these companies pass this cost on to the consumer in higher prices for gas or electricity.
Report Comment
Legal Citizen, . (9/21/2009 10:55:39 PM)
Proud Muslim: "It means we need to either drop the wind power option or find a solution to the problem."

>> Lessee... we're dropping the fossil fuel option, already dropped the nuclear option, already dropped the hydro option (too stressful for the fish),and now we should drop the wind option?

How many more options do you think we have?
Report Comment
Red Barron, (9/21/2009 11:10:24 PM)
I used to work in a place that used thriclorethelane 111 to clean parts but had to quit because it caused the hole in the ozone. We could have used perclorethelane because it only caused cancer in people. But the solution was simple. Send the parts to Mexico where they pour that stuff in the dump, but the parts are clean. Lost jobs here and still burnt a hole in the ozone ( if you believe that).
Report Comment
spiritof76, Tulsa (9/21/2009 11:33:38 PM)
The title of this article is kind of funny, in a morbid way.
Report Comment
2stepsfoward3back, 74114 (9/22/2009 3:43:58 AM)
I think we should take the bird carcasses and burn them as fuel. That would be true energy efficiency!
Report Comment
B_Tho, Guam (9/22/2009 5:57:54 AM)
How many human lives have been lost over the fight for oil!? I enjoy wildlife, but are birds more important?
Report Comment
ajohnb, Jenks (9/22/2009 7:09:32 AM)
Gee Proud Muslim, almost sounds like the healthcare debate. You want clean energy and don't want to harm the enviroment, then why haven't those greenie weenies come up with an alternative plan?

Legal Citizen said it all:

>> Lessee... we're dropping the fossil fuel option, already dropped the nuclear option, already dropped the hydro option (too stressful for the fish),and now we should drop the wind option?

>>How many more options do you think we have?
Report Comment
Proud Muslim, Tulsa: Coolest place in the world (almost) (9/22/2009 2:32:20 PM)
Legal Citizen, ajohnb, I didn't say we HAVE to drop the wind option. I said either drop it or find a solution to the problem. Several solutions were suggested in the article. Obviously, we can't completely resolve the problem, but we can at least minimize the bird deaths.

There's no limit on the number of alternative energy sources. Fossil fuels, nuclear, wind, solar, hydro, geothermal, wave... The key is finding the right balance to achieve maximum efficiency and minimum cost/pollution.

Let's not put all our eggs in one basket. I think we've had plenty experience with that.
Report Comment
nucleardad, Tulsa (9/22/2009 4:24:44 PM)
Nuclear power, anyone?
Report Comment
justiceawaits, Claremore (9/22/2009 5:55:49 PM)
Jut make the wind farms cover the turbine farm with chain link fence,better yet chickenwire.
I know its expensive, but it`s a onetime cost and we need to preserve the wildlife.
 

 
Add Your Comment 
In order to post a comment on this article, you must sign in to Tulsaworld.com. If you do not have a site account, you can create an account for free.

 
  
Post Your Comment
 


Most Popular Stories
Comments made yesterday 2,015
Total Comments 1,033,429
Register to make reader comments

Most Popular Stories




Tulsa World

Home | About Tulsa World | Advertise With Us | Privacy | Usage Agreement | FAQ and Help | Contact Us | Today's Headlines
Copyright © 2010, World Publishing Co. All rights reserved.




Advanced Search