MAKE US YOUR HOMEPAGE | Saturday, November 21, 2009 | WIRELESS CONTACT US | SUBSCRIBER SERVICES | SIGN IN SIGN OUT | MY PROFILE PAGE | MY ACCOUNT

Home > News > Article

Print this story Print      Email this story Email      Comment Comment      RSS RSS     
Share      Bookmark Bookmark

Health officials will try again to ban smoking in bars and restaurants

Dr. Alan Blum, director for the Center for the Study of Tobacco and Society, refers to an editorial cartoon while speaking to the media Thursday. JIM BECKEL/NewsOk.com
 
By TIM TALLEY Associated Press Writer
Published: 10/29/2009  10:23 AM
Last Modified: 10/29/2009  1:04 PM

OKLAHOMA CITY — Anti-smoking advocates called on lawmakers Thursday to make bars and restaurants in Oklahoma smoke-free by closing loopholes in the state law restricting smoking in public places.

Officials from the American Heart Association and the state Department of Health said they will support legislation next year to ban smoking in bars and restaurants, similar to a bill that died in the Oklahoma House last spring.

Oklahoma was among the first states in the nation to regulate smoking in public places in 2003. But the legislation allows smoking in separate smoking rooms in restaurants and stand-alone bars.

When the bill died in the House last spring, Rep. John Trebilcock, R-Broken Arrow, chairman of the House Public Health Committee, said he was not inclined to give it a hearing because of the investment restaurants had made to comply with state smoking restrictions.

Since Oklahoma's law went into effect, 27 other states have adopted comprehensive smoke-free laws that ban smoking in public places, said Marilyn Davidson, government relations director for the American Heart Association in Oklahoma City.

Davidson said the bill will protect restaurant and nightclub patrons from the harmful effects of second-hand smoke, which she said kills 38,000 people a year and increases the risk of coronary heart disease by 25 percent to 30 percent.

"It's just about health over money," said Dr. Alan Blum, a family medicine professor at the University of Alabama and director of the Center for the Study of Tobacco and Society.

Blum said

smoking is the leading preventable cause of death and disease. A report released earlier this month by the Institute of Medicine of the National Academies in Washington said studies have shown a decrease in the rate of heart attacks after a smoking ban was implemented.

But some Oklahoma restaurant and nightclub owners have opposed an outright ban on smoking, claiming it would have a negative impact on their business.

"We view this as a health issue, not a private property issue," Davidson said.

She said anti-smoking advocates are sympathetic with restaurant owners who spent thousands of dollars to build enclosed ventilated smoking rooms to comply with the 2003 law. But they are more concerned with the health of the people who work in those rooms.

Jim Hopper, president and CEO of Oklahoma Restaurant Association, did not immediately return a telephone call seeking comment on the proposed smoking ban.

Blum said the restaurant association is influenced by big tobacco companies that have historically opposed smoking bans and restrictions in public places.

"The fingerprints of the tobacco industry are all over them," he said. "We want to make it much harder on restaurants that don't care about public health."

Blum held up an oversized image of a $5 bill, about the cost of a pack of cigarettes, and criticized opponents of smoking bans for putting profits over health interests.

"It's all they care about. It's their blood money," Blum said.

By TIM TALLEY Associated Press Writer

Print this story Print      Email this story Email      Comment Comment      RSS RSS     
Share      Bookmark Bookmark

Reader Comments
       Add your comment

98 comments have been made on this story so far. Tell us what you think below!

Report Comment Reporting Comments

If you see a comment that violates our terms and conditions, please help us by clicking the "Report this Comment" link next to a comment. That will alert the web staff to review the comment. Thank you.  -- Web Editor Jason Collington
 
 
Report Comment
AB in BA, Broken Arrow (10/29/2009 3:02:50 PM)
I personally don't go to any place that allows smoking. And I hold my breath as I walk by someone who is smoking. I want to keep my lungs healthy because they are hard to replace. Also, smokers don't know how bad they smell and the smoke stays in their hair, cloths, and breath.
Report Comment
Digitalbath, (10/29/2009 10:38:50 AM)
Creating a law that makes it illegal to allow your patrons to smoking in the establishment that you own. This is so un-American it makes me ill. If customers do not want to be in a smoking establishment they won't go. If workers have a problem with smoke, don't apply for work at a bar or restaurant that allows it. Why should a business owner be forced to cater to a specific group? It is a private business. What about cigar bars? Should we ban smoking in them as well just because a non-smoker would like to have an appletini at that establishment? It is completely wrong to impose these rules on private business.
Report Comment
Digitalbath, (10/29/2009 10:44:54 AM)
People are in an uproar because this would take away a business owner's ability to serve or not serve at their discretion.
Report Comment
Digitalbath, (10/29/2009 10:46:19 AM)
That is the point. Bars and restaurants aren't public places.
Report Comment
Digitalbath, (10/29/2009 10:46:54 AM)
You walked in. You "injected" yourself.
Report Comment
Digitalbath, (10/29/2009 10:55:22 AM)
You should all get a pack of Camels and blaze one up. Smoking makes you look cool.
Report Comment
Digitalbath, (10/29/2009 10:59:17 AM)
Kidding....but seriously...I don't smoke. For what it's worth I think it is disgusting to go to a restaurant a smell smoke while eating. That is why I avoid places that allow smoking. Let the public decided. If no one wants to be in a smoking restaurant/bar, they will go out of business. Thus, problem solved for the smoke-haters (me included).
Report Comment
Digitalbath, (10/29/2009 1:42:23 PM)
57 Nomad:

Precisely! Who's fault is it when you walk in, notice the smoke and choose to come back? Don't complain, just leave. Private business owners do not have to adjust to your requests. You accept what they offer or go somewhere else.
Report Comment
Digitalbath, (10/29/2009 1:44:39 PM)
okpaul:
Bar attendance is up due to a terrible economy, not cleaner air. Tough times=drinking.
Report Comment
Digitalbath, (10/29/2009 2:17:09 PM)
drkdt:

You aren’t making sense. It has nothing to do with the first customer of the day. This isn’t the land run. The owner has the right to say whether smoking is or isn't allowed in their private business. It is then your choice, as a consumer, to then decide if you would like to be or not to be a patron of that business. Once again, no one is making a non-smoker enter a privately-owned smoke friendly establishment.
Report Comment
Digitalbath, (10/29/2009 11:59:24 PM)
Barleybaby:
Exactly right!

J C OK:
I don't understand. If you are so allergic, then why do you go to places that allow it? You must love the food and/or atmosphere so much that it takes precedence over your sick tummy. Whichever the case, stop whining or go somewhere else!
Report Comment
Digitalbath, (10/30/2009 10:28:38 AM)
OKi>3Ubuhbye:
I am terribly sorry about your father's failure to be a descent parent. Unfortunately, one of the few things in life that doesn't require a license, certification, etc. is having a child. Funny how the most important task in life can be attempted by any misfit. To your point, children obviously must deal with their parent’s decisions. I don't think that anyone with any sense would allow a child to be around 2nd hand smoke. That said, we shouldn’t ban things that can possibly be harmful to children because some parents are incapable of making good decisions. Once a week I enjoy a good cigar at my local cigar bar. I find it hard to stomach that that experience could be taken away from me. The key point is that we don't agree with the government imposing on private businesses. The big question is: Where do the non-smoker’s rights stop and where do the smoker’s rights start? The answer is simple. If you do not want to be around smoke, don’t go to a business that allows it. There is a place for smokers and non-smokers. It is a simple choice made by the consumer. It does not require legislation.
Report Comment
Digitalbath, (10/29/2009 11:01:39 AM)
GOB81:
Airlines=public company
Report Comment
Digitalbath, (10/29/2009 11:08:05 AM)
GOB81:
Actually, there is a plan for an all-smoking airline called Smintair (Smoker's International Airways). This is not a joke. They should be open for business next year. You should buy a ticket and then cry and whine about the smoke. That would make just as much sense.
Report Comment
Digitalbath, (10/29/2009 11:22:59 AM)
Jack9:
This article does not mention "public places". Maybe "public places" should be smoke-free. However, they are talking about a private business ban. Please read.
Report Comment
Digitalbath, (10/29/2009 11:40:37 AM)
Typical. While the masses argue about which party is superior, we are all getting doinked. I wish people would wake up and realize that both “choices” that we have been given are equally inept. It is completely unnecessary to classify every issue.
Report Comment
Digitalbath, (10/29/2009 11:46:52 AM)
Mar:
My Grandfather died from smoking. We all know the heath risks and disgusting qualities related to smoking. That is not the issue. The issue is using common sense when choosing your desired restaurant/bar. If you don’t like smoke, don’t go to a smoking establishment. No one is making you dine or drink at a smoke-friendly venue. There aren't that many left to choose from.
I agree with you about the televisions. Television-free restaurants and bars in 2010!!!!!
Report Comment
Digitalbath, (10/29/2009 11:51:58 AM)
TulsaTulsa:

Exactly! This has turned into the "Things that annoy Mar" thread. It is obvious that he is a sissy.
Report Comment
Mar, Tulsa (10/29/2009 11:40:40 AM)
I don't smoke and the second hand smoke bothers my sinuses. For years restaurants have had smoking and non-smoking areas with those "invisible" walls dividing them. Basically no matter where they put smoking areas, the smoke will end up in the non-smoking areas.

I'm for no smoking at all in restaurants. I'm trying to eat food minus the smoke. It's bad enough there are televisions throughout every restaurant (if you want to watch tv, stay home). I have no problem with smoking in bars. More people eat out than go into bars. If you absolutely can't stand smoke, then don't go to bars. But everyone that wants to, should be able to eat a meal out without consuming smoke also.

Right, Digitalbath, apparently you've never noticed smokers with their wrinkled lips, yellowed teeth, bad breath, coughs, been into their smoke covered homes and cars. And most of all, has never seen anyone close to you die due to lung cancer.
Report Comment
Few Clothes, America (10/30/2009 12:32:47 PM)
Ric and Lucky Girl. I'd rather enjoy the aroma of a good fart rather than cigarettes and cigars.lol.
Report Comment
One of Three Bears, Sand Springs (10/29/2009 12:57:04 PM)
I have been in both smoking and non-smoking bars. All of the bars and retaurants in Denver are non-smoking, but they do have outside areas for smokers. I have to say, as a non-smoker myself, I prefer the smoke free environments. It's nice not going home stinking like an ashtray and the sinuses not being blocked the next day. As for passing a law against it, I am not so sure I'm crazy about "big brother" taking one more thing away. What's next, alcohol, sugar, things that cause allergies?
Report Comment
Tim Denver, Denver (10/30/2009 12:25:18 PM)
Why would anyone want to purposely expose anyone to their cigarette or cigar smoke, knowing full well second hand smoke is dangerous to others? The worse is smoking around children. It is so great going into a restaurant or bar and not having to worry about being exposed.
Report Comment
Just a country boy, North Okmulgee County (10/29/2009 11:49:06 AM)
Next they will be banning drinking in the bar. after all they leave drunk and cause auto accidents. When does it end? Should be up to the bar or restaurant if the customers complain enough or don't go back they will provide smoke free places.
Report Comment
Carlos, Tulsa (10/29/2009 11:25:42 AM)
No need to ban smoking in restaurants altogether. As a nonsmoker, I'll just go to the smoke-free restaurants. We need less government on this matter. Either make tobacco illegal or let it stay as it is.
Report Comment
TulsaTulsa, Tulsa (10/29/2009 11:46:35 AM)
This would be so nice, to actually go watch a game somewhere or play pool and not be coughing and hacking all night and the next morning with a headache. Oh wait this is Oklahoma, won't happen for another 50 years, if that. From some of the comments above, people have no sense. Do you not think smoking or second hand smoke inflict physical harm on people? How is this different from punching someone in the stomach while in a bar? Oh wait "I won't get lung cancer, my granpappy smoked until he was 150 years old and was fine, except for that hole in his neck and that oxygen tank he was dragging around for 50 years! Oh yeah and his wife was doing the same and she never even smoked!, uhh wait a second..." ridiculous. Yes we will stay at home smokers, too bad your favorite bars are losing all of our business
25 of 98 comments displayed. | View All

 

 
Add Your Comment 
In order to post a comment on this article, you must sign in to Tulsaworld.com. If you do not have a site account, you can create an account for free.

 
  
Post Your Comment
 


Most Popular Stories
Comments made yesterday 1,932
Total Comments 896,134
Register to make reader comments

Most Popular Stories




Tulsa World

Home | About Tulsa World | Advertise With Us | Privacy | Usage Agreement | FAQ and Help | Contact Us | Today's Headlines
Copyright © 2009, World Publishing Co. All rights reserved.




Advanced Search