READ TODAY'S STORIES AND E-EDITION SUBSCRIBE |  CONTACT US |  SIGN IN
Print story only Print story with comments Email Facebook

School funding reduced yet again

This month's cuts total 7.11 percent because of a revenue shortfall

By CLIFTON ADCOCK and ANDREA EGER World Staff Writers


Schools will see a 7.11 percent total drop in state funding this month because of a $7 million shortfall in the House Bill 1017 revolving fund that the state Department of Education announced Thursday.



A shortfall in October collections spurred the department to order a 2.11 percent cut in addition to a 5 percent cut already mandated by the state. That shortfall will be passed on to local school districts in this month's disbursements.

State Superintendent Sandy Garrett said the reaction to the cuts would be unique to each district, although the department has been talking with some schools about consolidating.

"Each district has had to already rebudget and adjust their budgets all year," Garrett said. "I suspect we're cutting into the bone now."

Some relief may come from tapping the state's "rainy day" fund, but even it has its limits.

"The rainy day fund has its limits on what you can use," Garrett said. Referring to lawmakers, she said, "Obviously, I think they're going to have to use the rainy day fund sometime."

State education officials had warned last month that the amount in the HB 1017 revolving fund was running dangerously low, and that disbursements from it would come solely from collections.

Just as state collections earmarked for the general fund have dropped, so have collections for the 1017 fund, which was created in the 1990 education reform law to be a revenue stream for schools. The money, which goes directly to schools' state appropriations, comes from a variety of sources, including income, corporate, sales, and tobacco taxes and tribal gaming revenue.

Tulsa Superintendent Keith Ballard returned from a budget meeting with Garrett in Oklahoma City even more pessimistic about the future of state funding for common education.

"I think it could be as bad or even worse than I predicted a couple of months ago when I sounded the alarm. The state treasurer reassured us that we would be held harmless to 2009 (funding) levels, but I just don't see where the money is to hold us to '09 (funding) levels," he said. "I am extremely concerned about the budget picture, and I think it could have dire consequences for TPS."

Ballard called on State Treasurer Scott Meacham or Gov. Brad Henry to clear up the situation for school districts.

"I would just like clarification from the treasurer's office or the governor's office. As one who is fairly conversant in state budget matters, it looks fairly unlikely that they're going to be able to meet those '09 funding levels and more and more likely that that worst-case budget situation is going to happen," he said.

Trish Williams, the Tulsa district's chief financial officer, said she was still crunching the numbers to determine what the 7.11 percent reduction for November will mean for the district. As of October, Tulsa Public Schools had seen its state allocation reduced by $1.4 million.

Elsewhere, Union Public Schools likely has enough money to make it through the year if the funding cuts don't get worse, Superintendent Cathy Burden said.

Up to the end of October, the district had its revenue reduced by $438,000 this year, she said.

"That's a big cut, a cut that concerns us," Burden said. "We have enough reserve in our ending fund balance that we can weather a storm this year that's up to 5 percent level. I realize every district is going to be a little different. We are in a situation where we can weather this, but we are going to, of course, continue to be very, very frugal and conservative in how we're spending money."

Burden said the school would cut other areas if necessary to protect teachers.

"Our intent is to continue to maintain the employees we have in the district," she said. "We will cut and curtail expenditures, things that might come out of the general fund other than salaries and our people."

But the surplus that Union has built over the years can only hold out for so long, she said.

"We can't sustain this kind of cut for very long," she said. "We are really in a kind of wait-and-see, month-by-month attitude. As bad as this year is, my bigger fear is for next year."


Clifton Adcock 581-8462
clifton.adcock@tulsaworld.com

Copyright 2012 World Publishing Co. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.


Reader Comments 60 Total

Some reader comments for this page were copied from "Oklahoma schools expected to see further funding cuts," which was published on 11/12/2009.

Arbythree (2 years ago)
This is not good at all. This is as much of a concern to me as losing police to the budget crunch.
No more chocolate milk on fridays
Like our schools dont suck enough already.
Even more reason to homeschool. Goodbye political correctness, goodbye lack of funding, goodbye 40 minute classes, goodbye to dumbing down of classrooms.
FS (2 years ago)
Is there any good reason Ballard, Garrett, and the rest of their ilk can't take a cut also?

Everything is designed to maintain the staus quo while throwing the kids under the bus.
irwindale (2 years ago)
Garrett and the rest are nothing more than poor managers of our money and our childrens future.
Bob 1 (2 years ago)
Where is the lotto money???
Bob 1 (2 years ago)
FS Broken Arrow: So you want these guys to take a pay cut but you don't want the airline mechanics to take one. Which side of the fence you on? Obiviously a union man.
Bob1, the lottery hasnt generated nearly as much as they projected, Oklahoma doesnt sell near the volume they had thought, or planned....
Not only that, but what it generates, it is spread out all over oklahoma schools, trickling down from our top heavy administration , so that very little actually reaches theschools. The commercials you see, about the millions generated, are nothing more than lip service.
California, you got company.
gadfly (2 years ago)
Have high school programs offered "on-line." This would permit every student to individualized instruction, and get immediate help whenever necessary. No motre bussing, reduce dropouts, end discipline problenms, --- snd most importantly -- pass on huge savings to the taxpayers. A real win-win situation.
thehero (2 years ago)
Bob 1 and born okay the 1st time: School lottery money was used by our Legislature to fund 1/3rd the last $3,000 teacher pay raise. Since this raise is a recurring cost each year, lottery money must be used to fund this raise every year. It has nothing whatsoever to do with State or school administration or trickle down. School lottery money was to be used by schools as supplemental funding on top of what the State normally allocates to schools. The lottery money was to be used as each school district saw fit, not to supplant state funding by the Legislature.
redbeard (2 years ago)
WideAwake - I think it's all Bush's fault for making the economy tank.

That statement makes about as much sense as yours does.

We're in a recession and most will have make sacrifices.
redbeard (2 years ago)
If cuts are made,the first should be extracurricular activities.

Our kids need all the classroom time they can get.
Ric (2 years ago)
I thought the mayor said basically we're not cutting bone anymore, we're cutting into the marrow. eeaauuu!

Seriously, there should be plenty of money that can be located... get mean Tulsa.
Do what's right for your kids.
thehero (2 years ago)
Folks, A school district's budget is 85-80% personnel salaries and benefits. Most of the remainder is fixed costs such as insurance, textbooks (which have already been purchased for the year), utilities, fuel, etc. There is not much room to cut except personnel costs. Look for furloughs and RIFs to begin.
thehero (2 years ago)
Sorry, should be 85-90% personnel salaries and benefits in my last post.
Thunder196 (2 years ago)
Kids don't vote, why wouldn't they sacrifice them. Parents do vote. Parents remember this, keep track of what is cut where. See who is held exempt to any cuts.
.
Next election remember who voted for frills to stay and education to be cut further. From the school board members up.
Thunder196 (2 years ago)
007
You are right so right.
I have a friend that teaches at Oaks School in Delaware County. The school has not been able to provide paper to the teachers for basic quizzes, and most classes don't have enough books, her classes are using books that were published in 1994. What kind of education can be expected when the state doesn't provide the basic staples for learning? We/Oklahoma are failing our children, no question about it.
lizzy (2 years ago)
WideAwake, illegal aliens pay sales tax like everyone else. And if they get jobs with a fake SSN, they pay income taxes, as well. Not that I'm defending the practice, just pointing out the fallacy of your argument.
G5 (2 years ago)
WideAwake - It's just a weak arguement all around. Your arguement has more to do with the poverty cycle and living standards of the poor, citizens or not. You're grasping.
Lizzy: Have you ever calculated your taxes at the end of the year and found out that you owed? I have a time or two. Mainly with the state.

Whether or not they're paying their income taxes out of wage withholding alone, as you know, depends on how many dependents they claim on their withholding. They could be paying all they owe, they could be paying none at all.

Who's to say, really?
fld11 (2 years ago)
When you folks have decided that you've had enough of this extreme waste and corruption with the government schools and start emailing your reps and demand accountability, things will change. Until then, forget it. By the way, you might ask where the lottery money is being spent, and tell them to stop allocating so much to administrative costs, free lunches, and raises for the so called teachers. I'm so glad that my kids do not have to put up with TPS arrogance.
Mar (2 years ago)
Citizens of OK, I hate to burst your bubble, but other states are having the same problem with finances, including education. Kansas is having to cut school budgets also. It is happening all over, not just in Oklahoma. It is not just all about Oklahoma, you know there is a whole world outside of Oklahoma. So you can blame Dr. Ballard, Garrett and others in charge ad nauseam, but the facts are there isn't enough money, the gravy train is coming to an end.

Instead of keeping the status quo, government is going to have to face the facts that the dance is over and they are going to have to be realistic when it comes to budgets.

One way to cut the education budget is to consolidate some schools. It is asinine to have school districts that have 300 to 400 students or so. There are ways to consolidate that won't necessarily close all those schools affected and merging. But it is just not cost effective for each district to have their own superintendent, assistant superintendent, duplication of office equipment, etc. etc. etc.
25 of 60 comments displayed  |  View All


In order to post a comment on this page, you must sign in to Tulsaworld.com. If you do not have a site account, you can create an account for free.

Most Popular Stories
Most Viewed
Most Commented
 
View the Top 50
These are the most viewed stories in the last 24 hours.






Home | Contact Us | Search | Subscribe | Customer Service | About | Advertise | Privacy
Copyright © 2012, World Publishing Co. All rights reserved.