MAKE US YOUR HOMEPAGE | Wednesday, February 10, 2010 | WIRELESS CONTACT US | SUBSCRIBER SERVICES | SIGN IN SIGN OUT | MY PROFILE PAGE | MY ACCOUNT

Home > News > Article

Newspaper View Newspaper View      Print this story Print      Email this story Email      Comment Comment      RSS RSS     
Share      Bookmark Bookmark

Area districts may see shortfalls by the end of the school year

Substitute teacher Ann Maslanka helps student C.J. charles, 5, with his shoelaces outside Disney Elementary School in Tulsa on Friday while students wait to be picked up. JAMES GIBBARD/Tulsa World
 
By TIM STANLEY, SARA PLUMMER and CLIFTON ADCOCK World Staff Writers
Published: 11/14/2009  4:50 AM
Last Modified: 11/14/2009  4:50 AM

Area school districts say their monthly state funding shortages do not mean immediate changes, but drastic measures may be in store for next year.

In Owasso schools, the district expects to be short $1.5 million to $2 million at the year’s end, said Superintendent Clark Ogilvie.

Ogilvie said the district likely won’t have to make cuts this year, but staffing levels could be hit before school’s start next year.

“It’s the end of the year when we’ll really get hammered if things keep going like they are,” Ogilvie said. “That’s when you could see the super-damaging cuts — when we’re renewing contracts for teachers and letting them know who’s coming back.

Broken Arrow Public Schools spokesman Keith Isbell said the district planned for cuts in state funding and built that into its budget, adding that a reserve fund is available if shortages become too large.

“We think we can handle it based on our budgetary planning,” Isbell said.

“We had anticipated this being a bad budget year and more or less budgeted with the expectation that there would be cuts coming down the line. We think for this school year that we’ll be able to absorb these losses.

But next year’s budget may pose problems, Isbell said.

“Where it becomes problematic for us, and all school districts, even if you planned for the worst this year, there’s always next year,” Isbell said.

“That’s certainly a scary proposition as these cuts continue, and they get higher.

Jenks and Union superintendents say they also budgeted for cuts in state aid.

“A year ago, we planned on this year being a pretty difficult year, and we removed more than $1 million in expenditures from our budget in planning for this year,” said Jenks Superintendent Kirby Lehman.

“However, as the funding shortfalls continue and as they grow larger, we will possibly find ourselves in a situation where we have to take action on this year’s budget.

We are not there yet, but we’re getting close.

Lehman said he was unsure of the exact amount of the shortfall in Jenks, and school finance officials were not available Friday.

Donna Campo, superintendent at Liberty Public Schools, said the district is cutting costs by lowering thermostats and reducing lights used in buildings.

“We’ve been planning for it.

We’re considering a four-day work week,” said Campo.

Collinsville schools chief financial officer Rita Pate said conservative budgeting and cost-saving measures targeting energy use and other areas should allow the district to make it through the end of the year.

But staff cuts are possible going into next year, she said.

At Berryhill Public Schools, no layoffs or furloughs are planned for this year, and the district is likely to absorb vacated positions.

Superintendent Mike Campbell said things could change this summer and hopes the Legislature will tap into the state’s “rainy day” fund.

“Our attitude today, and it might change next month, is to ride this thing out,” Campbell said. “I’m worried about this spring and summer going into next year.


Tim Stanley 581-8385
tim.stanley@tulsaworld.com

Sara Plummer 581-8465
sara.plummer@tulsaworld.com

Clifton Adcock 581-8462
clifton.adcock@tulsaworld.com
By TIM STANLEY, SARA PLUMMER and CLIFTON ADCOCK World Staff Writers

Newspaper View Newspaper View      Print this story Print      Email this story Email      Comment Comment      RSS RSS     
Share      Bookmark Bookmark

Reader Comments
       Add your comment

7 comments have been made on this story so far. Tell us what you think below!

Report Comment Reporting Comments

If you see a comment that violates our terms and conditions, please help us by clicking the "Report this Comment" link next to a comment. That will alert the web staff to review the comment. Thank you.  -- Web Editor Jason Collington
 
 
Report Comment
Eagle 4, Tulsa (11/14/2009 6:57:43 AM)
And in a similar vein, the sun may rise tomorrow.
Report Comment
gadfly, Broken Arrow (11/14/2009 9:09:30 AM)
Public education, as it is now practiced, is an anachronism. The age of computers makes it possible to "home school" 99% of the students and thereby eliminate most of the huge costs associated with public education.

Individualized computer-generated home instruction would guarantee that each student would learn something that would be of use to "each" student, eliminate failure, and guarantee computer-literacy.

This is already happening on the college and university level -- and it's just a matter of time before it becomes the norm in high schools (as it already is in more remote parts of the US).

As for the present teaching staff and administrators? They can be re-trained to get involved in "pre-k" programs (where there is the most need -- especially in areas where family dysfunction is most dangerous to children.)

Are they going to like it? No

But the taxpayer can not continue to fund public education as it is now; and besides, public education can no longer meet the educational needs of the vast majority of our children.
Report Comment
Democrat, Tulsa County (11/14/2009 10:22:00 AM)
gadfly: Are you serious? Homeschooling works for some, but not for all. Computers are a fine tool, but they are not a substitute for the school environment in providing an education for 99% of our students. Where did you get your strange ideas?

The funding problem goes back to our current state legislative leadership. They had the "bright" idea to cut the state income tax in a "Reaganesque" scheme to "grow the economy." I tried to tell one of those leaders that their thinking was fuzzy. He assured me that by now, the state would be awash in money.

Even good teachers can't help some people. Unfortunately, some of those who don't know what they are doing are in charge of the legislative branch of the state of Oklahoma.
Report Comment
mnt, (11/14/2009 11:10:11 AM)
gadfly, you're correct in suggesting that our public education system needs restructuring but your proposed ideas are by no means accurate. They reflect a major lack of understanding of the issues. I take it you don't work in public education?
Report Comment
WoodyWayne, (11/14/2009 6:24:42 PM)
Working to reduce waste in Education should be a priority, and I believe the following example is a way to help save do that and improve our local economy. Please read below and remember that TPS is probably the 2nd largest employer in Tulsa ..........

Consolidating public schools should be the first step taken to reduce waste in Education. Then, we should assist Education Employees with the cost of their health insurance. This would be a tremendous step in eliminating redundant administrative costs, and stimulating the economy.

When small school districts retire or terminate a superintendent, we should try to consolidate those schools with another district to cut administrative costs statewide. For instance, now would be a good time to consider consolidating Sperry Public Schools with one of the large surrounding public schools. There is no reason to pay another Superintendent to oversee such a small school district, and pay for the additional Administration. The school could still have its identity, keep its same school mascot, but be administered by another Educational Service Center.

The next step should be to provide a better benefit package to Education Employees. Most people don't realize that a teacher must pay 3 times more for their family's exact same insurance, than the secretary working in Sandy Garrett's office at the Dept of Education. That is about $1000 dollars out of the teacher's take home pay, or you could say about a $1000 more in the OKC secretary's pay, and more money spent in OKC. (Notice how OKC area is not having the problem with sales tax revenue. That is because there are many state agency jobs in the OKC area, and those employees don't have an extra $600 to $1000 taken out of their pay for the identical benefits given to Education Employees.)

Just think about the fact that public schools are typically one of the largest employers in their cities and towns, and for that reason this is even more important in eastern Oklahoma, as we don't have the many state agency jobs. Reducing the cost of Education Employees health coverage would give them more money to spend locally, increase sales tax and state income tax.

If we would work on these suggestions, we will stimulate the economy, improve the quality of life for Oklahomans, and reduced wasteful spending in Education. Wow, this just makes too much sense!

I hope Education Employees and other Citizens will get organized and help others to understand how this benefits the entire state!
Report Comment
FUTURE WORLD, Tulsa (11/14/2009 10:17:17 PM)
Only the students will suffer.
Report Comment
Elusive, the burbs (11/16/2009 4:06:19 AM)
This is sad, I hope this economy pulls out before the end of 2010 for the students sake and teachers that may lose their jobs.
 

 
Add Your Comment 
In order to post a comment on this article, you must sign in to Tulsaworld.com. If you do not have a site account, you can create an account for free.

 
  
Post Your Comment
 


Most Popular Stories
Comments made yesterday 2,108
Total Comments 1,034,078
Register to make reader comments

Most Popular Stories




Tulsa World

Home | About Tulsa World | Advertise With Us | Privacy | Usage Agreement | FAQ and Help | Contact Us | Today's Headlines
Copyright © 2010, World Publishing Co. All rights reserved.




Advanced Search