READ TODAY'S STORIES AND E-EDITION SUBSCRIBE |  CONTACT US |  SIGN IN
Print story only Print story with comments Email Facebook

City Council OKs firm's donation of legal help

<span class="mugshot">READY TO GO</span><br />
<b>Clark Brewster:</b> "We start today," the attorney said. "We will get the pleadings already served and start preparing responses."<span class="mugshot">Larita Barnes</span><span class="mugshot">Larry Barnes Sr.</span><span class="mugshot">Bobby Haley Sr.</span><span class="mugshot">Demarco Deon Williams</span>

By BRIAN BARBER AND P.J. LASSEK World staff writers


Tulsa's City Council on Tuesday unanimously accepted a donation of $1.2 million in legal services from attorney Clark Brewster's law firm to defend the city in police corruption-related lawsuits.



"We start today," Brewster said following the council's vote at a special meeting.

"We will get the pleadings already served and start preparing responses and be very aggressive," he said.

The donation figure will likely change as more lawsuits surface. Three have already been filed in federal and state courts.

The city has received two additional tort claims, which are precursors to the filing of a civil rights lawsuit, said the city's chief litigator, Gerry Bender. The council was told the city expects the claims to become lawsuits.

The mayor's administration agreed to Brewster's donation after a conference Monday with Brewster and his partners in the firm of Brewster & DeAngelis to discuss strategy in the cases.

Mayor Dewey Bartlett had asked the council for a budget amendment of $400,000 to hire an outside law firm for representation last week when Brewster stepped forward with his pro-bono offer.

That money was just to get the process started. Proposals for defense in the three cases reached $900,000 to take them through trial.

Bartlett recused himself from the decision to go with Brewster because his company, Keener Oil & Gas, sent a lease proposal for an oil deal on the attorney's ranch.

Brewster said after the meeting that he never responded to the lease proposal he received from Keener two or three years ago.

"I actually threw it away and forgot about it," he said. "I don't see us (he and Keener Oil) having a business relationship."

Mayoral Chief of Staff Terry Simonson, however, said the mayor still wants to have a business relationship with Brewster, "so it was just cleaner to step back and disclose it."

He said Bartlett hesitated on the offer last week because "we wanted to understand the fullness of the gift."

Given that Brewster's firm "is financially stable and able to give the needed time to the city, we agreed to accept it," he said.

Brewster has said that his motive is philanthropic.

"For years, we have seen other people step up," he said. "There is a lot of sacrifice in the city. We feel it is our turn to help."

He expressed confidence in being able to defend the city, saying his firm is "not in the settling business."

"I truly believe the city's position is both factually and legally defensible," he said. "It's quite a step to get to the city, even in the face of having some rogue officers who might have done wrong."

He said after the meeting that the general public thinks that "just by virtue of a police officer doing wrong makes the city automatically liable, and that's not the law in a civil rights case."

"The plaintiffs have to prove an independent theory against the city. We don't think they are going to be able to climb that hill."

Councilor Rick Westcott agreed, saying, "These are not cases where the facts of the law are clearly against us, and it's just a matter of how much money the plaintiffs want."

Councilor Chris Trail said Tulsans should feel proud to have an attorney of Brewster's caliber representing the city.

"Frankly, I feel bad for the other guys," he said. "I know (Brewster is) going to be very aggressive and fight tooth and nail for us."

Brewster said that even though more than 20 potential plaintiffs have been reported, many wouldn't withstand scrutiny, although he expects more than the three lawsuits filed so far.

The city will pay case expenses unrelated to attorney fees, such as copying, depositions and travel for expert witnesses. Brewster said he doesn't think those costs will be more than $25,000 per case. Other proposals to the city had those costs as high as $194,000, the council was told.

Simonson said that if Brewster comes out of the gate "hard, really hard" with the first few cases, "there may not be any more."

"That's our hope," he said, "because the facts will be the same."

The names of eight current and former Tulsa police officers surfaced earlier this year as part of a federal grand jury investigation of police corruption. Indictments have alleged that officers stole drugs and money, planted drugs, falsified search warrants and violated civil rights.

Six former or current police officers and a former federal agent have been charged in the inquiry. Two other former officers have admitted stealing drug money; they have immunity while they cooperate with prosecutors.

So far, 25 people have been freed from prison, had their sentences reduced or their cases dismissed as part of the investigation, records show.



Pending lawsuits

LARITA BARNES

Convicted of a drug felony April 23, 2008, and sentenced Oct. 3, 2008. Freed from federal prison July 2, 2009. Was serving two 10-year sentences. Filed suit Aug. 6 in U.S. District Court against the city of Tulsa, former ATF Officer Brandon McFadden and Tulsa Police Officer Jeff Henderson. The suit alleges Barnes was deprived of her rights and illegally incarcerated. Federal prosecutors allege Henderson and McFadden coached a drug informant and fabricated a drug buy on May 8, 2007, that sent Barnes and her father, Larry Barnes Sr., to prison.

LARRY BARNES SR.

Convicted of a drug felony April 23, 2008, and sentenced Oct. 3, 2008. Freed from federal prison July 2, 2009. Was serving two five-year sentences. Barnes and his wife, Linda Sue Barnes, filed a lawsuit April 19 in Tulsa County District Court against the city of Tulsa, former Tulsa Police Chief Ron Palmer, Henderson and McFadden. The Barneses filed an additional tort claim notice Nov. 11, claiming retaliation by police officers who allegedly orchestrated drug buys trying to involve Barnes after he was released from prison.

BOBBY HALEY SR.

Convicted Sept. 30, 2005, of drug and conspiracy charges and sentenced Jan. 4, 2006, to 22 years in prison. He was released from federal prison in May. Filed a federal lawsuit June 3 against the city of Tulsa and the Tulsa Police Department. Officers involved in his case are Henderson and Bill Yelton, who have both been indicted.

Tort claims (Precursors to lawsuits)

DEMARCO DEON WILLIAMS

Convicted April 25, 2008, in federal court of cocaine possession with intent to distribute and received two life sentences, records show.

His convictions were vacated on April 30. Williams spent six years in federal prison or in jail awaiting trial.

Williams' release from prison is believed to be connected to a federal grand jury's examination of alleged police corruption, a World investigation shows.

Records indicate Henderson and McFadden were witnesses in Williams' trial. McFadden, a former agent in the U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, has pleaded guilty to drug conspiracy and is cooperating with federal officials while he awaits sentencing.

Henderson was indicted July 20 on drug conspiracy, attempted bribery, witness tampering, suborning perjury and civil rights violations.

PATRICK NEIL LONDON

Patrick Neil London was arrested during a traffic stop Jan. 12, 2009, and spent 435 days in jail because of a false arrest, his demand letter to the city states. He was charged in Tulsa County District Court with trafficking illegal drugs.

London alleges that he was wrongly jailed by Tulsa police officers involved in an alleged cover-up of his case. He is asking for $13 million from the city.

His case involves some of the indicted officers.


Brian Barber 581-8322 P.J. Lassek 581-8382
brian.barber@tulsaworld.com pj.lassek@tulsaworld.com

Copyright 2012 World Publishing Co. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.


Reader Comments 55 Total

Some reader comments for this page were copied from "City Council accepts $1.2 million legal services donation," which was published on 12/21/2010.

Ric (last year)
Good for them!
You saved yourself a million bucks Tulsa!
And they had to think about it before accepting?????

Thank You Clark for looking out for Tulsa.
Hey, now maybe the City of Tulsa has a chance of winning. If the Mayor and Council will get out of the way and let Brewster do his job.
Mar (last year)
"...Bartlett recused himself from the decision to go with Brewster because he has a possible oil deal in play with the attorney through his company Keener Oil & Gas. ..."

To the Mayor's credit, he made the right decision, both with recusing himself and also the Mayor agreeing to accept Mr. Brewster's generous offer.

Thank you Mr. Brewster, good luck.
Fred (last year)
Nothing is free.
Amazing on so many levels that it boggles the mind.
You got that right, Fred. Interesting how a guy who advertises on his website so he can bring cases against the police department now wants to represent the city against police department corruption charges for free. No conflict of interest there.
laz (last year)
can we look for mr.brewster to run for office in the future?
Now that Bartlett won't be able to steer a deal to one of his lawyer pals, will Joel Wohlgemuth continue defending the mayor for 'free'?

gfy (last year)
My view-what other kind of lawyer do you want? Thanks Clark!
Dadzilla (last year)
I wonder to which buddy Dewey had promised this contract.
Norm (last year)
My prediction: His strategy will be to sever the COT from the defendents at trial, by proving that the officers were acting outside of the scope of their duties, outside of their documented training, and outside of the law.

The only thing that will sting the COT at trial will be if they didn't thoroughly investigate previous allegations of misconduct against those particular officers (as has been alleged).

If he pulls it off - he'll be famous.
Clark is a megalomaniac with delusions of grandeur. His napoleonic complex often gets the best of him. He wants nothing more than his name in the papers and his face on TV. He is a media hound. This guy will sue anyone at any time if he thinks he can make a buck. He has WAY too many Plaintiffs cases pending to actually spend time on this fo the city. We will get shoddy work from him because he is more focused on his million dollar liability cases.

Tulsa will get bent over on this one way or another.
It does make you wonder if there is any motive behind it...everything has a motive
I agree, let's turn down his donation and get a lawyer we get to pay for! That'll make us happy.
FS (last year)
Norm makes a good argument re: Brewster's possible strategy.

One must remember, however, that while most of the 'ladies and gentlemen' released from prison or otherwise turned loose aren't without some manner of guilt/involvement in the alleged actions that landed their furry posteriors in jail to begin with after being noticed by the cops. Brewster is probably counting on the "decency" of the jury to limit the financial impact to the city.

Bottom line - the city employed the crooked cops and to some degree seems to have been complicit in this mess, if only to tolerate the cops' actions because it made Tulsa's elected officials appear to be tough on crime as in politics, reality always takes a back seat to appearances.

As far as this "gift" is concerned: this guy is a lawyer, ergo, a highly paid professional thief, liar, and manipulator, very similar to a politician. There ain't no such thing as a free lunch as the city will find after his "defense".
hardman (last year)
I hope Mr. Brewster has no hidden agendas or ulterior motives. I would like to think he's actually doing this as a way to help the City of Tulsa.
Carlos (last year)
I think this "generous offer" just shows how the lawyers, cops, and court officials in Tulsa all sleep in the same bed. Hopefully, at minimum, his "generous gift" will save taxpayers some money and hopefully it will still result in some prison time for the indicted cops.
I wonder what the cost of the free defense will be.
Mar (last year)
I always find it funny how many people complain, gripe and just hate attorneys, but when a person needs an attorney for a divorce, contract dispute, personal injury and other lawsuits, they are eagerly wanting an attorney's help. Can we say hypocrites? :)
Ric (last year)
Don't worry, be happy... make the best of it. It's a million bucks!
He's committed, and can't back out or mess it up. If he does he'll just jack himself up, right?
"Bartlett recused himself from the decision to go with Brewster because he has a possible oil deal in play with the attorney through his company Keener Oil & Gas."

Ha, Ha, Ha! Con-flict on some more interest Mr. Slick Dewey! Let's make sure that OIL deal goes through. $1.2 million is a nice TAX write off! Don't worry the lawyer will more than make up for it with the signing of the Oil Contract with Slick Dewey!

Thanks Mr. Brewster for trying to save a the Ole' Oil Capital of the World Good Ole' Boys from themself while insuring some good oil deals! WINK!

You might advise TPD to try to work a little more above board though! Little Chicago, Little Chicago its thier kind of town!
Carlos (last year)
Mar, Tulsa (8 minutes ago)
I always find it funny how many people complain, gripe and just hate attorneys, but when a person needs an attorney for a divorce, contract dispute, personal injury and other lawsuits, they are eagerly wanting an attorney's help. Can we say hypocrites? :)
===================================================

And I find it funny how many people complain about not being able to win the Indy500 on foot.......
States (last year)
Is this savings so that you can put it toward settling corruption cases?
Tulsa Tops them all for its polititian being in bed with the corportations.

Lets see, Lafortune accept a huge sum from BOK to put their name on the New Center. His Uncle was on the Board of BOK. EDGAR it.

The EX-Mayor Taylor had to resign as Board Member of BOK since many contracts are with BOK and that would have created a conflict of interest, and she so generously worked for free. The owner of BOK was originally in the OIL buisiness.

When are the citizens going to understand this city is concerned with the Oil industry Elite and Rich and not anyone else!!

The Elite give things to the poor for Tax Write Offs! They might care a little about making Tulsa LOOK a little humane but BIG money is the motive of most of the leaders of this city from day one, not the average person and definately not the poor discriminated against person charged wrongly by police.
25 of 55 comments displayed  |  View All


In order to post a comment on this page, you must sign in to Tulsaworld.com. If you do not have a site account, you can create an account for free.

Newsletter Sign up
Get breaking news email alerts
When significant news breaks locally, get an alert and link to the story.
  

Most Popular Stories
Most Viewed
Most Commented
 
View the Top 50
These are the most viewed stories in the last 24 hours.






Home | Contact Us | Search | Subscribe | Customer Service | About | Advertise | Privacy
Copyright © 2012, World Publishing Co. All rights reserved.