Related story: Poore decides not to testify on own behalf in Tulsa quadruple murder trial
After two weeks of trial and testimony from 29 witnesses, a jury deliberated less than two hours to render a guilty verdict and no-parole life sentence for one of two brothers charged in a quadruple homicide.
Your current subscription does not provide access to this content. Please click the button below to manage your account.
Subscribe
Thank you for reading and relying on TulsaWorld.com for your news and information. You have now viewed your allowance of free articles.
Login
Subscribe
James Poore was found guilty Monday in the fatal shootings of four women in a south Tulsa apartment more than three years ago.
Prosecutors maintain that James Poore, 35, and his 42-year-old brother, Cedric Poore, were robbing the women in 23-year-old Rebeika Powell’s apartment when they killed her and her twin sister, Kayetie Powell Melchor, as well as Misty Nunley, 33, and Julie Jackson, 55.
Nunley and Powell Melchor were staying with Powell at the time, and Jackson was a next-door neighbor, witnesses have said.
The women were found with gunshot wounds to their heads and their hands tied behind their backs in Powell’s apartment at the Fairmont Terrace complex near 61st Street and Peoria Avenue on Jan. 7, 2013.
Although the brothers faced the same charges − four counts of first-degree murder and two counts of robbery with a firearm − Cedric Poore will be tried later.
District Attorney Steve Kunzweiler declined to comment Monday on what James Poore’s verdict means for the pending case of his brother, whose attorney was in the courtroom for each day of testimony.
Jurors deliberated about an hour and 20 minutes to find James Poore guilty. They then took less than 20 minutes to decide that he deserves a no-parole life sentence for each murder count and life sentences on the robbery convictions.
That’s the maximum sentence they could recommend after prosecutors announced in 2014 that they wouldn’t seek the death penalty.
In closing arguments Monday morning, Kunzweiler told jurors James Poore’s guilt was evidenced by testimony from witnesses who said he admitted his involvement in the murders, as well as forensic evidence linking him to the crime scene.
Six witnesses testified that they heard James Poore make statements indicating that he was involved in the slayings or was planning a robbery shortly before the homicides occurred.
Those witnesses included his girlfriend at the time and three people who were living with her, as well as his niece and sister-in-law.
Crime scene evidence included a cigarette butt on which police identified James Poore’s DNA, as well as bullet casings police matched to casings from other locations where witnesses testified he or his family members had fired gunshots.
Jurors were also shown cellphone records of calls exchanged between phones belonging to James and Cedric Poore during the time prosecutors allege they were planning the robbery.
Prosecutors maintain that the phone records show that Cedric Poore’s phone traveled to Fairmont Terrace shortly before the homicides took place, followed by a break in activity during the time investigators believe the women were killed.
Defense attorney Wes Johnson asked jurors in his closing argument to scrutinize the credibility of the witnesses who testified about his client’s alleged confessions.
Regarding three of those witnesses, District Judge Kurt Glassco instructed jurors to consider the inconsistency of their testimony with prior statements only for the purpose of weighing their credibility.
One of those was James Poore’s former girlfriend Jamila Jones, who received immunity from prosecution in exchange for her testimony. Jones testified that she told James Poore the location of drugs and money in Powell’s apartment before the homicides took place.
Johnson also maintained that the forensic evidence doesn’t link James Poore to the slayings.
Prosecutors said they never recovered a murder weapon, and a retired FBI agent testified for the defense on Friday that the forensic examination conducted on the bullet casings is too subjective to conclude that there’s only one gun from which they could have been fired.
As for the cigarette butt, Johnson said James Poore frequented the victims’ apartment and could’ve left it there before the homicides occurred.
When jurors were instructed about sentencing options after they found James Poore guilty, Johnson asked them to have mercy on his client, who he said was born into a “gray and dystopian universe” dominated by crime and poverty.
Assistant District Attorney Julie Doss told jurors that “this isn’t (James Poore’s) first rodeo” after presenting evidence that he was convicted of four counts of robbery with a firearm in 2001.
“(James Poore) should never see the light of day,” Doss contended.
Johnson declined to comment on the case when he was addressed by reporters after the trial, saying that “everything that could’ve been said was said in that courtroom.”
Kunzweiler told reporters after the trial that he’d had a “substantial amount of evidence that pointed directly at James Poore,” and while acknowledging scrutiny of the case’s investigation, he commended local law enforcement.
“I think there’s been a lot of questioning as to how that investigation went, but it would not have gotten here if it wasn’t for the lead detective,” Kunzweiler said. “Kevin Hill did an excellent job on this case.”
Hill, now a patrol officer, attended the trial seated at the prosecutors’ table and was called by both sides to testify on Friday.
For victims’ family members who sat through hours of testimony, “justice has been served,” Julie Jackson’s siblings Clifford West and Sheila Stretch each told reporters outside the courtroom.
“We’ll never have our sister back, or his mother, or her sister,” said West, referring to other family members beside him. Nevertheless, the trial’s outcome offers some peace, he said.
James Poore is scheduled to return to court May 2 to be formally sentenced by Glassco.
Rules of Conduct
Welcome to the discussion.
11 comments:
Rocky Mitchell posted at 5:28 pm on Wed, Mar 16, 2016.
Why was the death penalty not invoked? If you tie four people up and then shoot them in the head...... Do you not think that they should deserve
to deserve to die the same way? Sadly, I'm sure there are bleeding hearts that will disagree.
Nathan Swanson posted at 7:46 pm on Tue, Mar 15, 2016.
I am glad justice has been done. One of the victims was the mother of a former student of mine. It was heartbreaking watching the family go through this tragedy; particularly when children are affected. The victims may have not been perfect people, but they did not deserve this. I too do not understand why a quadruple homicide of this nature should not merit out the death penalty.
Rick Neal posted at 2:50 pm on Tue, Mar 15, 2016.
Yes, people who commit a crime as such should receive a death sentence, and one that comes quicker than the norm. Less appeals, less time in prison, less tax dollars used. One reason why are laws must be modified to save us from paying so much into the criminal system. I mean really, you bind 4 people and shoot them in the back of the head, who deserves to live after doing that.
posted at 1:06 pm on Tue, Mar 15, 2016.
Good! One down one to go!
Katherine Carradini posted at 10:14 am on Tue, Mar 15, 2016.
He got off easy.
Ken Phillips posted at 9:02 am on Tue, Mar 15, 2016.
While I'm glad this coward will never see the outside of a jail cell again I wonder why he didn't get the death penalty??? These cowards MURDERED 4 innocent people. So what if two of girls smoked pot that doesn't mean they deserved to be tied up and executed. You kill 4 people and you don't get the death penalty??? This is some of the "change" our President was talking about.
Gerry Smythe posted at 8:10 pm on Mon, Mar 14, 2016.
That didn't take long.
They didn't even take enough time to get lunch...[smile]
Linda Quinn posted at 7:18 pm on Mon, Mar 14, 2016.
They didn't go for death Rocky because the girls were poor druggies that lived in subsidized housing.
Pamela Coulter posted at 5:27 pm on Mon, Mar 14, 2016.
Big deal, the liberal courts will give hime 9 do overs, just like they did those scumbags 30 yrs ago that burned up that couple in the trunk of their car. Next we will hear about being brought up in the ghetto and maybe even him and his bro are retarded [thumbdown]
Greg Simmons posted at 4:17 pm on Mon, Mar 14, 2016.
Wow... you mean white lives matter?
Rocky Mitchell posted at 3:55 pm on Mon, Mar 14, 2016.
He admitted guilt yet he maintains his innocence? So sad in that he has already protested his lawyer is not defending his rights adequetly. I still do not understand why he and his brother are not subject to death penalty? How do you tie people up and then shoot them in the head and then ask for leanancy?