MAKE US YOUR HOMEPAGE | Tuesday, February 09, 2010 | WIRELESS CONTACT US | SUBSCRIBER SERVICES | SIGN IN SIGN OUT | MY PROFILE PAGE | MY ACCOUNT

Home > Opinion > Article

Newspaper View Newspaper View      Print this story Print      Email this story Email      Comment Comment      RSS RSS     
Share      Bookmark Bookmark

More limits
 
By World's Editorial Writers
Published: 4/5/2007  7:18 AM
Last Modified: 4/5/2007  9:52 AM

Latest abortion bill passes

The Oklahoma House on Tuesday passed a bill aimed at preventing poor women from having abortions, even if their health is threatened by their pregnancies.

Senate Bill 714 prohibits a state employee from performing or assisting in an abortion in a public facility. The measure essentially cuts off public funding for any abortions. That will most affect low-income women who are forced to seek care in public facilities.

The measure now goes back to the Senate, where it passed earlier, for consideration of House amendments.

Rep. Doug Cox, R-Grove, who is the only physician in the Legislature, opposed SB 714, saying that it would take away a doctor's ability to decide what's best in extreme cases such as when the mother's health is in danger. The only exception allowed in the bill would be if the mother would die unless an abortion were performed. Cox pointed out that it is not possible for a doctor to say for certain that a woman would die if she did not have an abortion.

Cox also asked his fellow lawmakers, "Why would you force a woman to carry to term a child that will die at birth?" Why indeed? Because legislators presume to know more than doctors on such matters.

SB 714 is just the latest in a steady drumbeat of legislation intended to chip away both a woman's right to have an abortion and her practical chances of obtaining one. The anti-abortionists, who currently have a stranglehold on Oklahoma's political processes, won't rest until we return to the old days when women with enough money could travel out of the country if necessary to have an abortion performed in safe surroundings by qualified medical personnel, while those at the other end of the economic scale were forced to seek back-alley, coat-hanger abortions.

The most galling thing about Tuesday's vote was the lawmakers' presumptuousness in limiting physicians' right to counsel and treat their patients. SB 714 was opposed not only by the lone medical expert among their ranks but by the Oklahoma State Medical Association and the Oklahoma Osteopathic Association as well.

Here's a suggestion, dear reader: Next time you're feeling under the weather don't call a doctor, call a legislator.

By World's Editorial Writers

Newspaper View Newspaper View      Print this story Print      Email this story Email      Comment Comment      RSS RSS     
Share      Bookmark Bookmark

Reader Comments
       Add your comment

6 comments have been made on this story so far. Tell us what you think below!

Report Comment Reporting Comments

If you see a comment that violates our terms and conditions, please help us by clicking the "Report this Comment" link next to a comment. That will alert the web staff to review the comment. Thank you.  -- Web Editor Jason Collington
 
 
Report Comment
Bonnie Tremble, Tulsa (4/5/2007 7:37:28 AM)
Re: More Limits

4th paragraph:"Rep. Doug Cox, R-Grove, who is the only,......take away a doctor's ability to decide....." The doctor's ability is not taken away, only his right or authority. He still has the ability to decide. Misuse of the word "ability" has become very common with polticians and editorial writers!!!

Report Comment
Pam, (4/5/2007 12:02:08 PM)
Bill 714 does not prevent a woman whose life is in danger from having an abortion. It protects that woman's right to an abortion. What this bill will do is prevent doctors from killing the babies of poor women. These babies may or may not have a birth defect. Doctors are deciding they do based on prenatal testing. In case you don't know doctors now are taking it into their own hands to decide who can and who cannot live based on prenatal tests that are not always accurate. They are then counseling poor women to have an abortion based on these tests and they are not giving them information about any other possible outcome other than a death sentence for their baby based on their diagnoseis. Next time try not to write such a one sided article.
Report Comment
Kathy D, Edmond (4/5/2007 12:16:37 PM)
These "Doctors" have their own agenda. Thats to make money off of our tax dollar by killing innocent babies before they have a chance at life. They prey on "poor" women. I for one do not want any part of paying for abortions.
Report Comment
Mary Rittenoure, (4/10/2007 3:03:15 PM)
What a biased report. To heavy handed on one side of the issue and not representative of all the truths concerning the HS bill 714.

This editorial seems to take the stance that the law is not a right to abortion by the mother's choice. Rather is seems to take the stance that. Non of the Majorities' rights are valued: not the right of the taxpayer who has not agreed to blanketly fund with tax payer dollars optional abortions agreed upon also seems to be written in a form which is totally biased against any unborn child's basic rights.

Editorials may have the right to stretch some when it comes to reporting and asserting opinion over balanced facts, but I believe that the above editorial is clearly slanting way to far to one side, and it is totally clouding away any balance that an unclouded truth editorial might offer.

Report Comment
John 4, Oklahoma City (4/14/2007 2:06:08 AM)
I think everyone who commented on this story is a moron living inside a little bubble.

They don't even have a clue about what they're stating... be nice if they realized the difference between a standard "zomg I'm pregnant and I need this as my birth control method" abortion and the types this will restrict.

Report Comment
Kelli, Tulsa (4/18/2007 12:15:01 AM)
I think if someone doesnt want to have a baby whether it be planned or not is their choice. It is none of the goverments business nor the doctors business why someone is having the proceedure done. They are all getting paid in the end of the day right? The doctors go to work to work and make money. Government officials go to work to make money. Someone who cannot afford to mentally or financialy carry a baby should have the right to not have it even if one should say "learn from your mistake" or "if you can take on the responsibilty to have sex you should be responsible enough to suffer the consequences". I have heard this time and time again. What will we resort to? Illegal and self inflicted abortion. The government can't tax that. Thats one less thing for them to make money off of. Now that doesnt make sense. So who would be benifiting? US! Less expensive abortions, no taxes, no public ridicule. Great idea guys. One point for legislation.
 

 
Add Your Comment 
In order to post a comment on this article, you must sign in to Tulsaworld.com. If you do not have a site account, you can create an account for free.

 
  
Post Your Comment
 




Sport Blogs

Mike Strain
OU's Bradford moves up on Kiper's big board

Dave Sittler
Football recruiting's endless, but offering a 7th-grader?

John Klein
Recruiting Super Quarterbacks

The Picker
Spoil Sports? Spoiled Sports?

Jimmie Tramel
On the other hand.....










Tulsa World

Home | About Tulsa World | Advertise With Us | Privacy | Usage Agreement | FAQ and Help | Contact Us | Today's Headlines
Copyright © 2010, World Publishing Co. All rights reserved.




Advanced Search