MAKE US YOUR HOMEPAGE | Tuesday, February 09, 2010 | WIRELESS CONTACT US | SUBSCRIBER SERVICES | SIGN IN SIGN OUT | MY PROFILE PAGE | MY ACCOUNT

Home > Opinion > Article

Newspaper View Newspaper View      Print this story Print      Email this story Email      Comment Comment      RSS RSS     
Share      Bookmark Bookmark

Is it needed?
 
By World Editorial Writers
Published: 3/15/2008  2:53 AM
Last Modified: 3/15/2008  2:53 AM

Oklahoma Supreme Court rule may go too far

We agree with Senate Co-President Glenn Coffee, R-Oklahoma City. The Oklahoma Supreme Court may have gone a bridge too far when it passed a rule restricting online court records.

The rule, set to go into effect June 10, would prohibit any records beyond bare-bones court dockets from being posted online. Trying to address a growing protest, Oklahoma Supreme Court Chief Justice James R. Winchester has told lawmakers there is time to refine the new rules.

Winchester has sent lawmakers a letter of explanation on Thursday, the same day Coffee labeled the rules "a little bit of an overreaction."

The rule also would equire court clerks, who apparently pushed for new rules, not to include Social Security numbers, dates of birth, names of minor children and financial and taxpayer account numbers. Some clerks worried that online availability of pleadings could lead to identity theft, a genuine concern. But no instances could be cited where that had occurred.

Coffee correctly pointed out that withholding Social Security numbers makes sense. But the new rule wouldn't stop someone from obtaining information from a pleading at the courthouse.

Mark Thomas, executive vice president of the Oklahoma Press Association, said, "there's a lot of positive values to having these records available to the common man without having to go to the courthouse. If you think someone has a lawsuit in Harmon County, you are going to have to drive to Hollis and get in line at the courthouse."

Judging from reaction so far we suspect these new rules are about to be tweaked.

By World Editorial Writers

Newspaper View Newspaper View      Print this story Print      Email this story Email      Comment Comment      RSS RSS     
Share      Bookmark Bookmark

Reader Comments
       Add your comment

2 comments have been made on this story so far. Tell us what you think below!

Report Comment Reporting Comments

If you see a comment that violates our terms and conditions, please help us by clicking the "Report this Comment" link next to a comment. That will alert the web staff to review the comment. Thank you.  -- Web Editor Jason Collington
 
 
Report Comment
Steve, (3/16/2008 1:19:54 PM)
Court clerks do not like the idea of posting pleadings and orders on-line where they are readily accessible free of charge because it represents a loss of income to them. They would rather force the public to come to the courthouse and request copies of documents at the price of $1.00 for the first page and 50 cents for every page thereafter.
Report Comment
Mick, (3/17/2008 4:03:13 PM)

Also, they do not want people to easily see how unjust some of the proceedings truly are.
Think the "Innocent Man" by John Grisham. When records are easily accessible it is a bit more difficult for those in power to endeavor in their own criminal behaviors as has been commonly done and can now be seen by online records..
 

 
Add Your Comment 
In order to post a comment on this article, you must sign in to Tulsaworld.com. If you do not have a site account, you can create an account for free.

 
  
Post Your Comment
 




Sport Blogs

Mike Strain
OU's Bradford moves up on Kiper's big board

Dave Sittler
Football recruiting's endless, but offering a 7th-grader?

John Klein
Recruiting Super Quarterbacks

The Picker
Spoil Sports? Spoiled Sports?

Jimmie Tramel
On the other hand.....










Tulsa World

Home | About Tulsa World | Advertise With Us | Privacy | Usage Agreement | FAQ and Help | Contact Us | Today's Headlines
Copyright © 2010, World Publishing Co. All rights reserved.




Advanced Search