Tulsa World: Burnt offerings: Local plant turning waste into sidewalks

MAKE US YOUR HOMEPAGE | Saturday, November 21, 2009 | WIRELESS

Home > Opinion > Article

Newspaper View Print this story

Comment

RSS

Bookmark

Burnt offerings: Local plant turning waste into sidewalks

New landfill gas lines were installed at Lafarge North America Cement Plant in Rogers County. STEPHEN HOLMAN/Tulsa World

By WAYNE GREENE World Editorial Writer
Published: 6/28/2009 2:19 AM
Last Modified: 6/28/2009 3:50 AM

Out on the edge of Tulsa, recycling is getting pretty hot — 3,400 degrees Fahrenheit to be precise.

At the Rogers County plant for Lafarge North America they're burning all sorts of waste and making money in the process.

Lafarge's business is cooking cement. Here's how their recipe starts: Take calcium, silica, iron, alumina and a few other spices and make it really, really hot.

Hotter than the lava in a Hawaiian volcano.

I won't give you the rest of that story because I don't want anyone trying to make this stuff in a microwave.

The plant uses two 425-foot revolving kilns in its own culinary efforts. An industrial hot plate like that obviously burns a bunch of fuel.

Plant Manager Jim Bachmann says electricity and fuel — mostly coal — make up about 60 percent of his costs of operations.

So, to make his plant more profitable Bachmann is constantly looking for ways to cut the amount of fuel he has to pay for, and the company has found an intriguing method — using fuel someone else will pay them to burn, recyclable waste.

At the top of every rotation of that really hot revolving kiln, Lafarge tosses in an old tire. By the time the kiln has revolved back around, roughly 45 seconds, the tire is completely gone. The oil in the synthetic rubber has burned away as fuel — accounting for about 16 percent of the plant's fuel — and the steel belts have upped the metal content of the factory's cement.

"I like

to say we turn tires into sidewalks," Bachmann said.

Tires are an enormous waste problem in the state. We use up about 3.5 million of them a year. You can't landfill them whole, and grinding them up is more difficult and expensive than you might imagine. Every time you buy a new tire for your car, you pay a $1 fee to the state Department of Environmental Quality, which uses the money to pay recyclers to take away the old tire and to clean up the illegal tire dumps around the state. The Lafarge Tulsa Plant recycles about 750,000 tires a year.

When you burn a tire at 3,400 degrees, there's not a lot of waste that survives to go up the Lafarge chimneys. By comparison, Tulsa's trash-to-energy plant burns at 1,600 degrees.

Oklahoma ends up with less pollution, and Lafarge ends up with lower costs.

Bachmann calls it "industrial ecology" and his plant is taking another step in that direction.

The company dedicated a new pipeline connecting it to a nearby landfill, where a lot of Tulsa's garbage ends up every day.

That garbage piles up in an area until the landfill caps it. When the waste decays it produces methane, which the landfill collects in pipes and burns in the atmosphere.

That keeps the dump from exploding, but it's ecologically ridiculous. We're burying trash, producing fuel with it and using that fuel to heat the atmosphere.

"It's truly waste from waste," said Metropolitan Environmental Trust Executive Director Michael Patton.

The pipeline fixes that. It will take the methane to Lafarge, where it will go into the cement kiln. Oklahoma gets less pollution, and Lafarge ends up with lower costs.

Could we burn more of our environmental problems up at Lafarge?

Could Bachmann's plant handle the piles of mining wastes at Tar Creek or the heaps of chicken litter that are fouling our state's waterways?

Probably not. The heavy metals in the mine waste make it a bad choice and the chicken waste is more expensive to transport than it is valuable to burn, he said.

But the company is pursuing a plan to use liquid industrial wastes — Fuel Quality Wastes or FQW in the jargon of the industry — from heavy manufacturers.

A Lafarge subsidiary in Kansas takes acceptable wastes — no sewage, medical waste or radioactive material, please — then blends and homogenizes them for cement-making. Using FQW, Lafarge has been able to fuel some of its plants completely with alternative fuels — no fossil fuels, all waste fuels.

"It's a huge swing," said Bachmann. "We can do that in Oklahoma if we can get permitted to do industrial wastes."

The company is at the very beginning of the one- to two-year process of getting a state permit to use the industrial wastes. The company has held a public hearing on the issue in Owasso, Bachmann said.

Skylar McElhaney, spokeswoman for the Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality, said the company hasn't filed applications for either of the two permits that would been needed for the change, but has had preliminary discussions with ODEQ staff.

Typically, that sort of waste currently is going to injection wells where it is be buried far underground, hopefully never to reappear.

As with tires and landfill methane, the goal is lower costs for Lafarge, and those of us who pay taxes to build concrete arenas and streets can fall in love with the idea of spending as much of that money as possible in the local economy.

But the by-product that we all should be excited about is a cleaner Earth.

We live in a society that is going to use cement. We can make that cement using fossil fuels at a higher cost, or we can make it from industrial wastes and support the local economy. Seems like an easy choice to me.

Wayne Greene 581-8308
wayne.greene@tulsaworld.com By WAYNE GREENE World Editorial Writer

Newspaper View Print this story

Comment

RSS

Bookmark

Reader Comments

Show: Most Recent Comment First

Add your comment

9 comments have been made on this story so far. Tell us what you think below!

Reporting Comments

If you see a comment that violates our terms and conditions, please help us by clicking the "Report this Comment" link next to a comment. That will alert the web staff to review the comment. Thank you. -- Web Editor Jason Collington

	Report Comment Eagle 4, Tulsa (6/28/2009 9:57:27 AM) Gee, a bit more refining and this plan could put the Good Ol' Boys out of the asphalt business where the rubber meets the road, IF some lipsticked pigs could get their heads out of the Insurance trough long enough to notice.
	Report Comment Tulsonian, (6/28/2009 10:38:00 AM) "electricity and fuel — mostly coal" equal Green House Gasses. This does not equal "by-product that we all should be excited about is a cleaner Earth." Get Government money to pollute the air and tell everyone you are actually cleaning up the environment. Then throw in the "building the local economy" and get even more government cash. Sounds like a scam to me.
	Report Comment Polar Bear, (6/28/2009 12:57:32 PM) Our Department of Environmental Qaulity knows the standard of mercury released from coal is too high (causes genetic damage to fetuses)but is not doing anything,so can they be trusted to help protect us if burning tires leads to deaths?
	Report Comment Ayo, T-Town (6/28/2009 1:54:39 PM) These tires burn at such a high temperature there isn't any black smoke released to damage humans. Tulsonian, I noticed that 'mostly coal', too. :) Maybe they'll switch to natgas. It would be better than coal.
	Report Comment Daniel Day Simpson, Edmond (6/28/2009 2:04:17 PM) Its all relative. We can't afford to haul chicken waste to the plant for methane processing, or we can't afford to build methane plant at chicken farms and then transport the methane to the cement plant. But, we can afford to pay Stoops $5 million per year so 24 college kids can battle each other for a land acquisition game. Of course we need millions of yards of cheap cement to make those monstrous stadiums that hold the people who drink beer and eat hot dogs that create mountains of waste and drive home in cars that yield so much tire waste that we have to build mountains of waste.
	Report Comment Daniel Day Simpson, Edmond (6/28/2009 2:07:32 PM) 22 players, been to long since the season ended
	Report Comment Chuck Foxen, Tulsa (6/28/2009 6:04:33 PM) I hope they really have the environments best interest as a priority. Sounds like some questions already have been brought to the table.
	Report Comment Tulsa World Editorial Writer Wayne Greene, (6/28/2009 7:49:12 PM) Tulsonian, the alternatives discussed in the column -- methane or FQW -- would replace coal not the electricity. The alternatives are using coal plus electricity produced however PSO makes it. Or using alternative fuels and the same electricity. Sounds like a cleaner Earth to me.
	Report Comment Jay of Tulsa, (6/29/2009 10:15:58 AM) I think this $1/tire waste tax needs to be investigated...I think it's a scam as well. Why should we pay a recycler to take something they are going to make money on already?? I understand paying a landfill to take your trash, just not a recycler. That makes as much sense as paying Borge to take your aluminum cans.

Add Your Comment
In order to post a comment on this article, you must sign in to Tulsaworld.com. If you do not have a site account, you can create an account for free.

Post Your Comment

Mike Strain Good e-mails: Quarterback issues and Mangino woes	Dave Sittler What The Heck Was Gundy Thinking?
John Klein Not Pretty But it Is a Win	The Picker Stoops Needs Help
Jimmie Tramel Cheater (the one in the hoodie) doesn't prosper

Comments made yesterday	1,932
Total Comments	896,671
Register to make reader comments

1) New York Terrorist Trial

2) Road warriors

3) Letter to the Editor: 'Hocus pocus'

4) Veterans win

5) Letter to the Editor: Listen to sanity

View the top 50
These are the most viewed stories in the last 24 hours.