MAKE US YOUR HOMEPAGE | Saturday, November 21, 2009 | WIRELESS CONTACT US | SUBSCRIBER SERVICES | SIGN IN SIGN OUT | MY PROFILE PAGE | MY ACCOUNT

Home > Opinion > Article

Newspaper View Newspaper View      Print this story Print      Email this story Email      Comment Comment      RSS RSS     
Share      Bookmark Bookmark

Tar Creek afterlife
Will cleanup efforts work?
 
By World's Editorial Writers
Published: 10/9/2009  2:22 AM
Last Modified: 10/9/2009  4:15 AM

The town of Picher, epicenter of one of the largest environmental disasters in the nation, technically ceased to exist last month. Area residents are being removed from harm's way, but the mess remains to clean up.

Mining caverns, bore holes, acres of leftover tailings and monstrous chat piles remain, signifying a place of vast mineral wealth that turned into vast mineral waste.

More than $100 million has been spent by the federal government trying to clean up the 43-square mile Ottawa County mining district, once one of the nation's top suppliers of zinc and lead. Both the land above and the soil below are constant threats. Water quality is impaired. Even vegetation is a source of concern.

But there is promising work afoot. Unlike dozens of cleanup projects in the past — which failed or fell far short of their goal — a new $1.2 million passive, organic water treatment system has cleaned up one-fifth of contaminants that enter into the lead- and zinc-polluted Tar Creek stream.

Robert W. Nairn with the University of Oklahoma Center for Restoration of Ecosystems and Watersheds says that's significant: "I believe it is a successful project but we will know more when we come back in five years."

The project, operational for about a year, is designed to remove 200 pounds of aluminum, 40 pounds of arsenic, eight pounds of cadmium, 105,000 pounds of iron, 500 pounds of nickel, 33 pounds of lead and 6,000 pounds of zinc every year.

The design life for the innovative
treatment plant is 30 years. That's a pretty good return on a $1.2 million investment. And even better still, it's working.

Miami, Okla., Mayor Brent Brassfield, who toured the plant recently, believes the process should be used on the entire Tar Creek area. That's certainly an appealing idea.

Unlike the Environmental Protection Agency's almost worthless and costly efforts to remove contaminated top soil from yards, this modest project is the little engine that could.

The OU project appears to be succeeding where bureaucracy failed.
By World's Editorial Writers

Newspaper View Newspaper View      Print this story Print      Email this story Email      Comment Comment      RSS RSS     
Share      Bookmark Bookmark

Reader Comments
       Add your comment

7 comments have been made on this story so far. Tell us what you think below!

Report Comment Reporting Comments

If you see a comment that violates our terms and conditions, please help us by clicking the "Report this Comment" link next to a comment. That will alert the web staff to review the comment. Thank you.  -- Web Editor Jason Collington
 
 
Report Comment
Loki, Broken Arrow (10/9/2009 2:54:01 AM)
There is something appealing in using a natural process to mediate our unnatural spoiling of the sites.

One hopes we get smarter as we confront this all-too-common industrial blight. We learn slowly, but perhaps we eventually absorb the lessons (along with the lead).

Laissez-Faire leaves a mark. And it puts the public at the tender mercies of groups who follow one principle: profit over all other considerations.
Report Comment
LEO, (10/9/2009 8:33:08 AM)
I would like to thank OU and Mr. Naim for taking an idea that I present to EPA several years ago as a way to help in stopping disgharges from Tar Creek to downstream water impoundments, which EPA said was not a permanent solution for Tar Creek and would not use and does not follow Federal law, so I could finish with a permanet solution I was developing. I do not how you got EPA to approve this and I am not trying to take any credit for what you have done, but I am very pleased that you did a project at Tar Creek that the EPA said they would not do and take this project somewhere else. My hat is off to you. EPA needs and the Person directly in charge of the EPA (President Obama) needs to understand that there are many in Oklahoma that care and can provide inovation that will benefit environment problems like Tar Creek. THANKS LEO BYFORD
Report Comment
Skyhawk, Downtown Tulsa (10/9/2009 11:38:06 AM)
Thank you Senator Inhofe.
You have saved lives in your district and have managed to obtain continual funding for this project! All by working WITH three different administrations.

Job well done!

I am sorry for all those that had to leave their homes. In the 1900's thru 30's, we didn't know what we didn't know. We know now.

Hopefully, Senator Inhofe will continue to request funding to continue his good work!
Report Comment
tulsaGuy, (10/9/2009 12:37:54 PM)
Anybody checked to see if the Picher Housing Authority, etc. are still getting federal funds?
Report Comment
Polar Bear, (10/9/2009 2:10:35 PM)
Why do companies get to mie,make a mess and then have others pay...even with their life and health.The nuclear industry refuses to accept responsibility for shabby building practices..Still our reps in Conrress look the other way.Little guys always pay..
Report Comment
okie ridgerunner, Small Country Town State Line (10/9/2009 3:43:39 PM)
I drive thru picher once or twice a week. and there are still quite a few people living there.hud still has people in the low income apts and the drug rehab still has several people living there.there is not much being done there. but there are several people still around.
Report Comment
WhoseLeft, Tulsa (10/9/2009 10:21:29 PM)
Skyhawk,

Are you speaking ironically? Senator Jim was the one who wanted to keep piling new top soil on top of the contamination.

My memory is that he was opposed to moving people out of Picher. New dirt, that was the solution that failed for decades. Of course, it spured a whole new industry in moving dirt.
 

 
Add Your Comment 
In order to post a comment on this article, you must sign in to Tulsaworld.com. If you do not have a site account, you can create an account for free.

 
  
Post Your Comment
 




Sport Blogs

Mike Strain
Good e-mails: Quarterback issues and Mangino woes

Dave Sittler
What The Heck Was Gundy Thinking?

John Klein
Not Pretty But it Is a Win

The Picker
Team Pansy

Jimmie Tramel
Cheater (the one in the hoodie) doesn't prosper










Tulsa World

Home | About Tulsa World | Advertise With Us | Privacy | Usage Agreement | FAQ and Help | Contact Us | Today's Headlines
Copyright © 2009, World Publishing Co. All rights reserved.




Advanced Search