MAKE US YOUR HOMEPAGE | Tuesday, February 09, 2010 | WIRELESS CONTACT US | SUBSCRIBER SERVICES | SIGN IN SIGN OUT | MY PROFILE PAGE | MY ACCOUNT

Home > Opinion > Article

Newspaper View Newspaper View      Print this story Print      Email this story Email      Comment Comment      RSS RSS     
Share      Bookmark Bookmark

Letter to the editor: Coburn vs. political science
 
By Julianne Romanello, Tulsa
Published: 10/17/2009  3:57 AM
Last Modified: 10/17/2009  3:57 AM

Recently Sen. Tom Coburn proposed legislation that seeks to eliminate National Science Foundation funding for political science research. His amendment does injustice to American citizens by discrediting the educative functions of government and the academy and by confounding the definition of science itself.

Political science began with Socrates' question of what it means to live well. Coburn's memorandum, however, assumes certain methodologies are the criteria for science, a very modern understanding. Until recently, most serious thinkers assumed science was the attempt to replace opinion with knowledge, reflecting a variety of methods and objects. Reducing "science" to knowledge about physical or theoretical entities leaves us in the dark about human concerns, because humans cannot be considered either purely physical or theoretical.

Coburn thinks the public has little use for more scholarly studies. Our Republic, Thomas Jefferson wrote, depends on well-educated citizens monitoring their representatives. The founder of the University of Virginia would never agree that citizens should be satisfied to rely upon the mainstream media. Moreover, what are we saying about the importance of participatory government if government questions the scientific legitimacy of research about its activities?

Coburn's amendment disregards the tradition of political science influencing our nation's founding. Adams, Jefferson and Madison pored over Thucydides, Aristotle, Locke and Montesquieu. They saw themselves putting political science to use for the good of individuals and mankind. Political science is not just about studies of racial- or sex-based voting. Political science is about what makes a regime good and enduring.


Letters to the editor are encouraged. Each letter must be signed and include an address and a telephone number where the writer can be reached during business hours. Addresses and phone numbers will not be published. Letters should be a maximum of 250 words to be considered for publication and may be edited for length, style and grammar. Letters should be addressed to Letters to the Editor, Tulsa World, Box 1770, Tulsa, Okla., 74102, or send e-mail to letters@tulsaworld.com.
By Julianne Romanello, Tulsa

Newspaper View Newspaper View      Print this story Print      Email this story Email      Comment Comment      RSS RSS     
Share      Bookmark Bookmark

Reader Comments
       Add your comment

14 comments have been made on this story so far. Tell us what you think below!

Report Comment Reporting Comments

If you see a comment that violates our terms and conditions, please help us by clicking the "Report this Comment" link next to a comment. That will alert the web staff to review the comment. Thank you.  -- Web Editor Jason Collington
 
 
Report Comment
Democrat, Tulsa County (10/17/2009 6:26:09 AM)
Good letter. It is just more evidence of red-state opposition to quality education. The politicians of the red-states wish to keep the people ignorant in order to continue to win re-election to office. The people continue to oppose spending public money for anything that they see as not immediately benefiting them economically as individuals.
Report Comment
true2form, Grand Lake (10/17/2009 7:17:54 AM)
Read my bookmark, "Another Coburn Wonder"
Report Comment
Willard_Roker, (10/17/2009 10:14:49 AM)
Science is God's method for outing false prophets.
Report Comment
Liberty1776, Owasso (10/17/2009 10:28:08 AM)
Who has actually read a Political Science book, article, or conference paper recently? Most political science articles do not add much to our public discourse on our current political predicaments. Instead, Poli Sci academics write articles for select few, focusing on quantitative methods and exclusive academic discourses. These differ greatly from the Political Philosophies from Plato to Machiavelli and from Locke to Kant. Tom Colburn is doing the right thing to propose eliminating this wasteful government funding. Lets have the money pay off ouy national debt. This will force academics to spend more time in the classroom teaching. Isn't that the reason why our public dollars pay their salaries? To teach the majority rather than or a elct few? From a former-PhD Political Scientist.
Report Comment
Que, Terlton (10/17/2009 10:35:49 AM)
Aristotle,the Father of the scientific method, thought all things should be open to examination and subject to reason. He applied the scientific method to all areas of human knowledge and made major contributions to biology, physics, philosophy, ethics, logic, poetics, education, and citizenship that are still valuable today.

I can understand that politicians miight not want scientist poking around in their business but Aristotle would have thought it appropriate.

Que
Report Comment
Liberty1776, Owasso (10/17/2009 10:51:41 AM)
Que represents how the average person does not understand political science. Name one contemporary "political scientist" that has made a major contribution to society? (Note: Aristotle was a philospher in the classical science and no Political Scientist would label him has a Polic Sci as Poli Sci was developed in the mid-1900s!). Lets get real and stop wasteful funding!
Report Comment
Proud Muslim, Tulsa: Coolest place in the world (almost) (10/17/2009 12:47:21 PM)
Well, I've tried to read a political science book. Political science really isn't my cup of tea.

How much funding is needed for political science research I have no idea. If Coburn voted against funding it, I want to know what his proposals are. Is there some other field that he thinks needs funding and would be beneficial to America?

Need more info.
Report Comment
Woofenburger, Hominy (10/17/2009 12:54:39 PM)
More info?

Reference "Dr. No".
Report Comment
HUM-ing Bird, Terlton (10/17/2009 1:18:09 PM)
Hummmmm,
Liberty 1776:

Did you say that you have a PhD in Political Science?
Report Comment
LibertyBlessedAmerica, Tulsa (10/17/2009 5:02:41 PM)
Dear Julianne Romanello,

Thank you for that letter to the editor. That was a well thought out and well written letter. Sorry to write a comment like a school teacher, but I was impressed.

Are you originally from Oklahoma?

Tom Coburn is against education. Smart people ask too many questions and analyze information too much.
Report Comment
richard waddell, Bartlesville (10/17/2009 8:30:27 PM)
I thought “The Political Brain: the role of emotion in deciding the fate of the nation” by Drew Westen was helpful in understanding our politics. I thought the book was helpful in understanding political campaigns.

Since it was helpful, I don’t know whether Liberty would classify the book as “political science.”

The question of whether to fund studies should not be decided on the basis of whether they are classified as “political science,” but whether there is a good chance they would add useful knowledge about our political systems.
Report Comment
richard waddell, Bartlesville (10/17/2009 8:33:42 PM)
A former-PhD? I didn't know one could shed a PhD.
Report Comment
FUTURE WORLD, Tulsa (10/17/2009 9:00:46 PM)
Here again Sen. Coburn shows his deftness at changing his colors to aid the republican masters at the RNC. He speaks of saving money by eliminating wasteful spending. But in reality they realize they are on the losing end of modern day political realities, philosophy and politics. So under the cover of eliminating waste, he's actually trying to eliminate the academic studies that criticise conservative thinking.
Report Comment
truth fairy, (10/18/2009 1:53:16 AM)
Thank you, Ms. Romanello, excellent letter.
Defunding the arts and sciences of our country, while financially accommodating political religious zealotry and subsidizing war among nations not our own, seems an obvious recipe of a democracy's doom.
Tom Coburn and his "Family" have an agenda, and it is not served well by our intelligence, or our liberty.
 

 
Add Your Comment 
In order to post a comment on this article, you must sign in to Tulsaworld.com. If you do not have a site account, you can create an account for free.

 
  
Post Your Comment
 




Sport Blogs

Mike Strain
OU's Bradford moves up on Kiper's big board

Dave Sittler
Football recruiting's endless, but offering a 7th-grader?

John Klein
Recruiting Super Quarterbacks

The Picker
Spoil Sports? Spoiled Sports?

Jimmie Tramel
On the other hand.....










Tulsa World

Home | About Tulsa World | Advertise With Us | Privacy | Usage Agreement | FAQ and Help | Contact Us | Today's Headlines
Copyright © 2010, World Publishing Co. All rights reserved.




Advanced Search