Restaurant Inspections: Area food safety violations rise
BY CURTIS KILLMAN World Staff Writer
Sunday, March 09, 2008
3/10/08 at 9:18 AM
Search: Search restaurant inspections recorded from 2004-2007 by the Tulsa City-County Health Department.
Related Story: Inspection time is crunch time
Failing grades given to Tulsa County
eateries increased 50 percent in 2007.
More restaurants and
other places that
serve food are failing food safety inspections, a Tulsa World review
of government data indicates.
Health inspectors flunked
235 Tulsa County food establishments during 2007. That's a
50 percent increase over the
previous year, when 154 flunking grades were handed out to
eateries.
In all, nearly 5 percent of all
inspections conducted in Tulsa
County among three major categories of the food service industry resulted in failing
marks.
One restaurant tallied 31 violations during a food safety inspection in 2007. That restaurant, The Rice Bowl Cafe at
4307 S. Sheridan Road, has
flunked three inspections since
2004. The business was voluntarily closed after one inspection in 2005. It wasn't the only
Tulsa County business to temporarily close during 2007 because of food safety issues.
Thirty-one businesses voluntarily closed temporarily in
2007 following unfavorable
health inspections by the Tulsa City-County Health Department, records show.
Health department officials
say they are not sure why the
number of closings increased.
"Why it would jump up so
high -- better supervision, better training -- I don't know,"
said Elizabeth Nutt, director of
the local health department's
Consumer Protection Environmental Health Services Division. Nutt said she was surprised at the increase in
closures, given that the department was "somewhat short
staffed" during 2007.
Other possible reasons for
the increase in closures and
failed inspections:
- The recent retirement of
many long-term Tulsa City-County Health Department inspectors.
- An increase in the number
of restaurants that require
stricter oversight because of
the food they serve.
A business can flunk a food
safety inspection three different ways: receiving three or
more "super critical" violations, tallying seven or more
critical and/or super critical violations, or a combination of
four or more critical violations
and 10 noncritical violations.
Super critical violations are
the top causes of foodborne illness.
There are 51 types of violations in all, including 21 classified as critical and nine classified as super critical.
The increase in closures coincides with an increase in the
average number of total violations given per inspection. In
2006, restaurants averaged 6.0
violations per inspection compared with 6.7 violations in
2007.
Restaurants also experienced slight increases in the
number of super critical and
critical violations from 2006 to
2007.
Health Department workers
conducted 4,875 and 4,958 routine and complaint-based inspections during 2006 and
2007, respectively, among establishments classified as food
service, food service with a bar
and combined retail facilities.
Among those receiving multiple violations was Duffy's of
Bixby, 12908 S. Memorial
Drive. The eatery averaged 1.7
super critical violations per inspection over the course of 11
routine and complaint-driven
inspections conducted since
2006.
The business voluntarily
closed in July after an unfavorable inspection. The eatery
saw its license suspended in
August after an inspection that
was triggered by a complaint.
But all of that is old news to
Somar Al-Chammat, who recently acquired the business
from a relative.
"I just bought it three
months ago and now it's all different," Al-Chammat said.
"We've been remodeling and
working on the place to make it
look better and show the customers that it is different now,"
Al-Chammat said.
"They gave me a new license," Al-Chammat said, referring to the City-County
Health Department. "No problems at all."
He said he has taken out ads
in the local paper, notifying the
public that the restaurant is under new ownership.
"Business has been picking
up, so that tells me that people
are satisfied," Al-Chammat
said.
This is the first restaurant to
be owned by Al-Chammat, who
said he likes his new venture.
"I don't like to work for anybody," Al-Chammat said. "I
want to be my own boss."
Inspection issues cut across
eateries both big and small.
The Cedar Ridge Country
Club, 10302 S. Garnett Road,
averaged 13.6 violations over
the course of the 16 times it
was inspected since 2004, ranking it among the more frequently cited facilities over the
past four years. Twice the club
failed inspections in 2007, records show.
But Clive Stubblefield, gen
eral manager of the facility,
said operations and personnel
have changed drastically in recent months.
Stubblefield said the new
chef is a health department-certified food service manager
and a "safe serve" certified
manager through a chef association.
"And I think if you look you
won't even see that we've had
any critical violations," Stubblefield said, referring to the
most recent inspection.
Indeed, the facility received
just seven violations -- all noncritical -- in its last inspection
in October.
"We work hand in hand with
them because our member
safety is our No. 1 concern,"
Stubblefield said, referring to
inspectors.
"Unfortunately for your readers they are going to sit there
and read this and say 'Oh, my
God, what's going on?' but in
the real world, they don't understand that a Styrofoam cup
sitting in the wrong place is a
critical violation," Stubblefield
said.
Conversely, inspectors
handed out 108 perfect scores
among the nearly 5,000 inspections conducted in 2007.
Two restaurants, Prime
Time Pizza at 109 N. Elm in
Jenks and Eddy's Steakhouse
at 3510 E. 31st St., rank No. 1
and No. 2, respectively, among
restaurants in terms of the fewest average number of critical
and super critical violations
since 2004.
Prime Time Pizza, a takeout
only business, received no critical or super critical violations
during 10 inspections dating
back to 2004.
Manager David Powers said
the restaurant has been in
business for seven years and
has always fared well on inspections.
"We've never had a critical,
ever, here," Powers said.
At its most recent inspection,
the eatery was written up because the fan guards were dirty
in the cooler, Powers said.
They cleaned them that day.
Eddy Elias, owner of Eddy's
Steakhouse, said he and his
four employees make food
safety a priority.
"We watch it very carefully
every day," Elias said.
In the past four years, Eddy's
has never had more than four
violations during an inspection
and it has received only one super critical violation.
Elias credits having a staff
that has been with him for decades as a key factor in knowing how to maintain good food
safety.
The increase in violations
may be a reflection of a widespread change in how restaurants operate.
"More restaurants are either
switching, or being built new
as facilities, whose operations
require at least four inspections per year," the most intense inspection schedule, said
Clyde Harding, Food Program
Manager with the Tulsa Health
Department.
As the inspectors have gotten busier, Harding said,
Health Department officials
find they have less time to educate restaurant employees on
food safety, Harding said.
Mexican and Asian restaurants both were cited at higher-than-average rates, a World
analysis of inspection data indicates.
Mexican restaurants experienced an average of eight violations from 2004 through 2007,
tops among the various types
of restaurants. Asian restaurants averaged 7.3 violations
during the same time period.
The higher-than-average violation rate may be because
most Mexican and Asian restaurants are classified as high-risk facilities because of the nature of their operations.
The more heating and cooling of food that goes on in a
restaurant, "the more you tend
to have violations," Harding
said.
Fast-food restaurants, meanwhile, had an average number
of 6.3 violations per inspection,
over the four-year period, a
rate just slightly below the
overall average of 6.5 violations.
Nutt said it makes sense that
businesses classified as high
risk are being cited more often.
"There's really more opportunity for things to go wrong
because they are more complex operations," Nutt said.
Curtis Killman 581-8471
curtis.killman@tulsaworld.com
By the numbers
- In 2006, restaurants averaged 6.0
violations per inspection compared with
6.7 violations in 2007.
- Health Department workers conducted
4,875 and 4,958 routine and complaintbased
inspections during 2006 and 2007,
respectively.
- Thirty-one businesses voluntarily closed
temporarily in 2007 following unfavorable health
inspections.
- Inspectors handed out 108 perfect scores among
the nearly 5,000 inspections conducted in 2007.
Source: Tulsa City-County Health Department
Associated Images:

Steve Elias dishes up tabouli in the kitchen at Eddy’s Steakhouse, 3510 E. 31st St. The restaurant is among the top restaurants in Tulsa
County in terms of the fewest violations during inspections since 2004.

Steve Elias dishes up tabouli in the kitchen at Eddy’s Steakhouse, 3510 E. 31st St. The restaurant is among the top restaurants in Tulsa
County in terms of the fewest violations during inspections since 2004.
|