Follow us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter Follow us on RSS
Sports Extra!
Follow us on ...
OU | OSU | TU | ORU | HIGH SCHOOLS | COLLEGE FOOTBALL | COLLEGE BASKETBALL | NFL | FANTASY | OUTDOORS | GOLF | PROS | ALL




SPORTS EXTRA BLOGS
    Sports Editor
Mike Strain

Sports Columnist
Dave Sittler

The Picker
Entertaining & Infuriating

LOCAL PROS

ALL SPORTS

PHOTOS & VIDEOS

OUTDOORS

FIND A STORY

EMAIL ALERTS

SOCIAL MEDIA

RSS FEEDS

CONTACT US
BUY PHOTOS & PAGES

TULSA WORLD

ADVERTISE ON SPORTS EXTRA



Newspaper View Newspaper View      Print this story Print      Email this story Email     
Share      Bookmark Bookmark

Attorney unsure of future
Lawyer says he does not know if Balogun will be allowed to play.

CONTROVERSY CONTINUES
Mike Balogun: Documents show Florida State raised questions about the Sooner linebacker's eligibility.
 
By JOHN E. HOOVER World Sports Writer
Published: 8/20/2009  2:39 AM
Last Modified: 8/20/2009  2:23 PM


Related stories: Balogun sues NCAA over eligibility

Florida State, which dealt with similar issue, notified OU about Balogun

Mike Balogun timeline

Former OSU baseball player’s case could apply to Balogun

Document: View the petition in the case.

Document: View the temporary restraining order in the case.

Mike Balogun's lawyer feels strongly that his client has suffered "irreparable damage," but he's not sure anything can be done about it.

"We're going to do everything we can for him," Norman attorney Woody Glass said in a telephone interview Wednesday. "It really depends upon what the judge will ultimately do on our efforts to get a permanent injunction against the NCAA."

Balogun, a senior linebacker at Oklahoma who transferred from junior college prior to last season, was certified eligible to play by the NCAA in May 2008. But last Friday, the NCAA decertified Balogun because it believes he played in an amateur football league after his 21st birthday.

But on Tuesday, Balogun — his legal first name is Ademola — filed and was granted an injunction against the NCAA to continue practicing. He'll appear in Cleveland County District Court next Monday.

"What we're seeking is to say that the NCAA breached its contract and that they didn't act fairly and in good faith with him through this investigative process. That's one arm of it," Glass said. "The second arm of it, which I think is really Mike's best argument, is that they had all this information available to them way before all this stuff has come to light and they certified him."

Balogun graduated from high school in Maryland in May 2001 at the age of 17, and turned 21 on Sept. 28, 2004.

Documents obtained by the Tulsa World on Wednesday show that Balogun's eligibility at OU was questioned by a member of the Florida State University compliance staff the day after OU's loss to Florida in the BCS national championship game on Jan. 8.

The NCAA has concluded that Balogun played after his 21st birthday, though Balogun and Gary Rice, a former owner (from 2003-05) of the Maryland Marauders, the team for which Balogun played in the North American Football League, gave sworn affidavits that he didn't play after 2004.

A Maryland newspaper reported last year that Balogun played for the Prince George Jets in 2005. The Web site semiprofootball.org lists Balogun as an all-star in the NAFL for the 2005 season, but Terry Sullivan, a former league commissioner and NAFL executive, told the Tulsa World last week that NAFL records are often inaccurate. In the documents, Glass contends that Sullivan told OU that he personally reviewed Balogun's files and found no information that he played after turning 21.

Glass contends that Balogun asked the NCAA to interview Dennis Felton, a Marauders assistant coach, during his 2008 certification process, but said "there is no evidence" the NCAA attempted to contact Felton then. But in March-April 2009, Glass' brief says OU compliance officers interviewed Felton and Felton told them he believed Balogun played with the Marauders from 2004-06.

"I can almost assure you that they did not contact that guy and they certified Mike Balogun," Glass said. "And they cannot now come back and say, 'Well, he's not certified; we found something else out.' Well, that's crazy."

NCAA spokesman Erik Christianson wrote in an e-mail interview, "Overall, we are disappointed we were not given the opportunity to explain our position to the court, and we look forward to doing that and showing the court why the restraining order should not have been entered."

The restraining order will allow Balogun to keep practicing beyond the NCAA's 14-day blanket waiver, which expired Wednesday. Balogun now awaits a ruling from Cleveland County District Judge Tom A. Lucas in a 2:30 p.m. Monday hearing on whether he can keep practicing.

Whether or not he'll play for OU, however, is far more difficult to determine.

OU has asked the NCAA for a waiver specific to Balogun's case, but it appears unlikely the waiver will be granted. And if the court grants Balogun a permanent injunction that allows him to play in games in 2009, it's then up to OU to let Balogun play.

But if Balogun gets to play and the NCAA appeals, and Lucas' decision then is reversed, the Sooners — already on probation from the Rhett Bomar/J.D. Quinn troubles of 2005-06 — could be in more hot water for playing an ineligible player. NCAA Bylaw 19.7 takes into account court proceedings and allows the NCAA to penalize the school after a final determination is reached.

"It runs right afoul of this rule 19.7 that the NCAA has," Glass said. "I'm obviously looking at it from Mike's perspective, but I think it really puts OU in a very tenuous position about what they do."


John E. Hoover 581-8384
john.hoover@tulsaworld.com
By JOHN E. HOOVER World Sports Writer

Newspaper View Newspaper View      Print this story Print      Email this story Email     
Share      Bookmark Bookmark


COMMENTS 
      Add your comment Show: Most Recent Comment First

37 comments have been made for this team so far. Tell us what you think below!

Report Comment Reporting Comments

If you see a comment that violates our terms and conditions, please help us by clicking the "Report this Comment" link next to a comment. That will alert the web staff to review the comment. Thank you.  -- Web Editor Jason Collington
 

 
Some reader comments for this story were copied from "Florida State, which dealt with similar issue, notified OU about Balogun," which was published on 8/19/2009.

Report Comment
FaithnHim, Crested Butte, (8/19/2009 4:51:59 PM)
Now the truth comes out. I felt sure the squeaky wheel was from another college team.
Report Comment
billsmith, (8/19/2009 4:56:25 PM)
Bobby Bowden is a woman scorned...
Report Comment
Guillermo, (8/19/2009 4:58:12 PM)
Let's see how this plays-out.
Films and emails will tell the tale.

Is it really worth the gamble to let him play?

OU is loaded with talent and people to
step-up and fill the slot.
Report Comment
seymore1965, Tulsa (8/19/2009 5:36:26 PM)
Balogun must scare Florida.
Report Comment
healthguyfsu, (8/19/2009 5:40:22 PM)
You people are idiots and the reporter only told half of the story.

The reason FSU requested Balogun's eligibility documents was not for some stupid witch hunt as is implied. It had to do with filing their own case and using Balogun's record as precedence for establishing eligibility.

It has to do with an appeal case we filed for Corey Surrency, a kid from the streets of Miami who played "semi pro" flag football to get away from the bad crowds, a kid who lost his mother to cancer just last year, a kid who wanted more than anything to just get a degree and be the first in his family to do so. The NCAA denied him a senior year...he got one year of D1 football due to this quirky rule about semi-pro ball...this is a kid who didn't even play HS football.

Get your facts straight before you go running off at the mouth like morons.
Report Comment
SoonerbornandSoonerbred, (8/19/2009 5:46:29 PM)
FSU and Bobby Big Mouth Bowden suck
Report Comment
FSSTU, (8/19/2009 5:56:52 PM)
Healthyguy hit the nail on the head. Too bad, people are prone to judge before knowing ALL of the facts.
Report Comment
Cali Style, Tulsa (8/19/2009 6:15:47 PM)
There Sooners. They don't know any better.
Report Comment
DeafRon, (8/19/2009 6:24:51 PM)
Nice grasp of the English language, Cali.
Report Comment
Cali Style, Tulsa (8/19/2009 6:30:34 PM)
Looks like the point was made Deaf!
Report Comment
ranger, (8/19/2009 7:05:26 PM)
I guess you guys don't realize that ever since OU ripped fsu in the 2001 orange bowl they have gone down and out ever since. We would have thought that when you play a game you lose you just take your lumps and go on, but if you had kept up with things you would know Bobby Bowden has kept a grudge ever since. Check out the last two coaches polls where anyone with a brain can tell Bobby and Tommy both held a grudge. If you want to hide behind some cancer patient that's even more pitiful.Don't worry we're playing a home and home series and Bobby's hiding time is getting ready to expire.
Report Comment
hootie, Tulsa (8/19/2009 7:11:56 PM)
Sorry OU has no one else to blame but themselves. THEY should have done some research themselves and verified what they were being told was accurate instead of just believing what they were told especially since they were just on probation AGAIN.
Report Comment
rw74133, (8/19/2009 7:15:10 PM)
The hell with FSU and Bob-hu...
BOOMER SOONER!!!!!!!!!!!!
Report Comment
BOOMER! SOONER!, (8/19/2009 7:26:19 PM)
healthyguyfsu,

if the FSU and Bowden are so righteous and care so much about kids, why are they trying to bring down a kid whose eligibility has proven? If they succeeded they'd take away Balogun's senior year, the same that was done to their kid. That's just sour grapes and doesn't do anyone any good.
Report Comment
BOOMER! SOONER!, (8/19/2009 7:27:05 PM)
hootie, maybe you didn't read the part of the article where OU and the NCAA verified Balogun's eligibility.
Report Comment
healthguyfsu, (8/19/2009 8:32:31 PM)
Boomer,

Once again don't let the facts get in the way of your ranting. This article is shoddy journalism and doesn't tell the whole story.

FSU brought Balogun's case up during the appeal for Surrency's year as precedence for granting eligibility....not to say "take this guy's eligibility away too"

I'm sorry that it didn't work out for Surrency because he did deserve it..as much or more than Balogun. But the fact of the matter is FSU took no active steps to strip Balogun's eligiblity...if FSU had their way, Surrency would be playing and there would be no question of Balogun's eligibility. They were using his case to support their argument for Surrency....of course the author of this crappy Tulsa paper neglected to mention any of this.

I don't know how many more ways I can say it to make you all understand but I would feel much better if someone from Oklahoma with a brain could actually comprehend these points...am I hoping for too much?
Report Comment
healthguyfsu, (8/19/2009 8:35:08 PM)
In other words, rather than grant eligibility to two kids that deserve it the NCAA denies one and investigates the other.

You are misdirecting your rage at the wrong entity and its mostly due to this hack John Hoover who can't even put out a complete story.
Report Comment
healthguyfsu, (8/19/2009 8:38:44 PM)
Last comment I'll make on the issue. It was FSU's compliance dept. (who had lawyers representing Surrency during his appeal) that requested the information in order to put together his case for the appeal.

Bobby Bowden did not have anything to do with this and I doubt he even knows who Balogun (or any other player on OU's roster including Bradford) is so please do the online perception of your intelligence a favor and stifle your ignorant comments.
Report Comment
BOOMER! SOONER!, (8/19/2009 8:39:25 PM)
If he's investigated, then yes, the NCAA could decide to strip his season. After all, they've set that precedent with Surrency. I understand your points but you're only thinking in terms of the best possible outcome. It's a very real possibility that Balogun could also be ruled ineligible and thus both players would have lost their senior season.

THAT is the point I am trying to make.
Report Comment
BOOMER! SOONER!, (8/19/2009 8:42:02 PM)
and by the way, living in Florida does not make you intellectually superior in ANY way. Your arrogance is disgusting and very typical of people from the east coast. Have you ever been to Oklahoma? I imagine you've flown over, and that's not a good way to gauge a state. And lastly, I think Bobby Bowden knows MANY OU players names, considering they are always mentioned among the best at their positions in the country. Coaches keep up with these kinds of things.
Report Comment
boomerdg, (8/19/2009 10:07:18 PM)
Last post from BOOMER! SOONER! says it all. Left coast "more holy than thou attitude!"
Report Comment
healthguyfsu, (8/19/2009 10:13:28 PM)
I don't live in Florida and doubt anyone in the country assumes living in Florida makes you smart (most people prob. think the opposite)...I live in Texas and no I am not a fan of any of the Texas schools.

I do not think that where you live makes your intellect superior in any way (I hate Northeastern snobs as much as anyone) but I find it hard to bite my tongue on the insults when your fans fail to comprehend even the simplest points and continue posting ignorant drivel about Bowden that makes no sense. As I've said, he had ZERO to do with this.

The statement about Bobby not knowing your players was not a knock on OU. Its no secret that Bobby has trouble with names. We love him so I don't care but I can tell you its a very real possibility that the name Balogun has never entered his mind and possibly even the name Sam Bradford.

Further, you were not trying to make a point that Balogun COULD be stripped.

To quote your remark from above:
"if the FSU and Bowden are so righteous and care so much about kids, why are they trying to bring down a kid whose eligibility has proven? If they succeeded they'd take away Balogun's senior year, the same that was done to their kid. That's just sour grapes and doesn't do anyone any good."

You call it sour grapes and again act as if FSU had an agenda to bring down Balogun when in fact that is so very far from the truth. I have already explained to you why his records were requested and the last thing FSU wanted was to have Balogun be in question since they were trying to use his eligibility as evidence to support their case. It makes no sense for them to try and destroy his eligiblity when they wanted to use that as evidence to support Corey's appeal. Did an investigation open as a result of this evidence? Maybe...and that's unfortunate. But it was not intentional and just goes to show you how messed up the NCAA is.

Rather than give one kid his shot at a career and a college degree the NCAA would prefer to strip two kids of eligibility. That's the heart of the matter and the blog writer and most of these posters missed it entirely (or he did it on purpose just to get more hits for his lame ass blog based on shock value).
Report Comment
healthguyfsu, (8/19/2009 10:15:33 PM)
boomerdg,

Just stop you are making yourself look stupid. The "left coast" (as you so aptly put it) when you are looking at a map would be California not Florida...pure genius.
Report Comment
Better Than, Tulsa (8/19/2009 10:24:31 PM)
I'll take the bet that even Bowden knows an OU player by the name of Sam Bradford.
Report Comment
healthguyfsu, (8/19/2009 11:33:49 PM)
Better Than,

you may be right...but the guy is 70 and we all know he's on borrowed coaching time as it is with 1-2 years left tops. Most sensible Nole fans are not delusional about this.

However, the point I was trying to make clear is that Bowden has no idea who Balogun is...I know this is a heated topic for you guys because you don't want to lose players but c'mon does anyone with a bit of sense really think 70 year old Bobby Bowden orchestrated a witch hunt to steal eligiblity from a lineman all the way over in Oklahoma when FSU has absolutely no stake in whether he plays or not?? Use your heads for a minute.
25 of 37 comments displayed. | View All

 

 
Add Your Comment 
In order to post a comment on this article, you must sign in to Tulsaworld.com. If you do not have a site account, you can create an account for free.

 
Post Your Comment
 



Home | About Tulsa World | Advertise With Us | Privacy | Usage Agreement | FAQ and Help | Contact Us | Today's Headlines
Copyright © 2010, World Publishing Co. All rights reserved.