Enough about the "does too" "does not" debate regarding automatic renewal of the state gaming compact. There is another issue that has not been adequately explained: the exclusivity clause.
To single out one group for favored economic benefit seems, on the face of it, inherently discriminatory.
Not convinced? Then imagine the state of Oklahoma trying to defend in court, any gaming compact that specified "whites only." What happened to equal treatment under the law?
No reasonable person would expect that to survive a court challenge. Such a proceeding would likely render the compact null and void.
Seems like the only solution is to acknowledge that fact and start over.
Dennis Roe, Tulsa
Letters to the editor are encouraged. Send letters to firstname.lastname@example.org.